STEREOTYPES AND BARRIERS FOR WOMEN ADMINISTRATORS IN DIFFERENT CULTURES

It has been long debated that discrimination based on the gender is one of the basic barriers that hinder schools achieving the goals in democratic societies. Researches about tackling gender issues have increased recently and investigated whether there are barriers for women for administration. Since management theories are mostly resembles each other throughout the world within the times, comparative studies need to be done considering the cultural context. The purpose of the paper is to compare and contrast researches about women administration at schools and other institutions together with the barriers and stereotypes they experience in promotion. It was employed qualitative research design to analyze 39 articles published in four journals of education, leadership and gender. The studies analyzed in this paper have concluded that women more or less, or overt or covert had to face with disadvantaged settings compared with men in administrations in different cultures regardless of developmental level of countries.

KADIN YÖNETİCİLER İÇİN FARKLI KÜLTÜRLERDE KALIP YARGILR VE ENGELLER

Demokratik toplumlarda okulların amaçlarını gerçekleştirebilmelerinin önündeki engellerden biri olarak kabul edilen cinsiyet ayrımcılığı literatürde uzun süredir tartışılmaktadır. Bu konuda yapılan araştırmalar yönetimde kadınlara yönelik engellerin olup olmadığını incelemektedir. Yönetim teorilerinin dünya genelinde zaman içerisinde birbiriyle benzeştiği düşünüldüğünde farklı kültürel bağlamlarda karşılaştırmalı çalışmalara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, kadın eğitim yöneticilerinin farklı toplumsal ve kültürel bağlamlarda sergiledikleri yönetim davranışlarını ve karşılaştıkları kalıp yargıları konu alan uluslar arası nitelikte ve eğitim indekslerinde yer alan makaleleri bazı temalar açısından incelemektir. Araştırmada nitel araştırma desenlerinden iç içe geçmiş durum çalışması modeli kullanılmıştır. Bu doğrultuda eğitim, eğitim yönetimi ve liderlik alanlarında uluslar arası veri tabanlarınca taranan dört eğitim dergisinde yayınlanan kadın eğitim yöneticileri konusunda 39 makale içerik analizine tabi tutularak yorumlanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre farklı kültürlerde kadınlar, az veya çok, ya da açık veya örtük bir şekilde ülkelerin gelişmişlik düzeyinden bağımsız olarak yönetimde benzer uygulamalarla karşılaşmakta ve erkeklere gore dezavantajlı bir konumda bulunmaktadır.

___

  • Aslanargun, E., (2011). Barriers Women Principals Face In The Administration Of Schools: Perspectives From Turkey. Paper presented on the Sixth Annual Conference of Educational
  • Administrators and Supervisors, 15-18 th April 2011, Cyprus.
  • Aslanargun, E., (2012). Do Women Principals Really Face With
  • Barriers in Schools? Critics of Glass Ceiling Syndrome in Turkey, International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, Volume: 4, Number: 2, pp. 255-264. Blackmore, J., (2010). The Other Within: Race/Gender Disruptions to The Professional Learning Of White Educational Leaders.
  • International Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume: 13, Number: 1, pp. 45-61. DOI:10.1080/13603120903242931
  • Bradbury, L. and Gunter, H., (2006). 'Dialogic Identities: The Experiences of Women Head Teachers and Mothers in English
  • Schools'. School Leadership and Management, Volume: 26, Number: 5, pp. 489-504. DOI:10.1080/13632430601007956
  • Boulton, P. and Coldron, J., (1998). 'Why Women Teachers Say
  • 'Stuff It' To Promotion: A Failure Of Equal Opportunities?’ Gender and Education, Volume: 10, Number: 2, pp: 149-161. DOI:1080/09540259820998
  • Bown, L., (1999). 'Beyond the Degree: Men and Women at the Decision-Making Levels in British Higher Education'. Gender and Education, Volume: 11, Number: 1, pp: 5-25. DOI:1080/09540259920735
  • Bradbury, L., (2007). 'Dialogic Identities: The Experiences of
  • Women Head Teachers and Mothers in English Primary Schools'. Journal of Educational Administration and History, Volume: 39, Number: 1, pp: 81-95. DOI:10.1080/00220620701194341
  • Chan, A.K., (2004). 'Gender, School Management and Educational
  • Reforms: A Case Study of a Primary School in Hong Kong'. Gender and Education, Volume: 16, Number: 4, pp: 491-510. DOI:1080/09540250042000300394
  • Coleman, M., (2007). 'Gender and Educational Leadership in
  • England: A Comparison of Secondary Head Teachers' Views over Time'. School Leadership and Management, Volume: 27, Number: 4, pp: 383-399. DOI:10.1080/13632430701562991
  • Coronel, J.M., Moreno, E., and Carrasco, M.J., (2010). Beyond
  • Obstacles and Problems: Women Principals in Spain Leading Change Schools’. International Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume: 13, Number: 2, pp: 141-162. DOI:1080/13603120903144442
  • Court, M.R., (1998). 'Women Challenging Managerialism: Devolution Dilemmas in the Establishment of Co-Principalship in
  • Primary Schools in Aotearoa/New Zealand'. School Leadership and Management, Volume: 18, Number: 1, pp: 35-57. DOI:1080/13632439869763
  • Court, M., (2007). 'Changing And/or Reinscribing Gendered
  • Discourses Of Leadership In Education?'. Gender and Education, Volume: 19, Number: 5, pp: 607-626. DOI:1080/09540250701535642
  • Cushman, P., (2008). So What Exactly Do You Want? What
  • Principals Mean When They Say Male Role Model, Gender and Education, 20(2), 123-136. DOI:10.1080/09540250701805847
  • Çelikten, M., (2005). A Perspective on Women Principals in
  • Turkey. International Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume: 8, Number: 3, pp: 207–221. DOI:10.1080/13603120500041835 Ducklin, A. and Ozga, J., (2007). 'Gender and Management in
  • Further Education in Scotland: An Agenda for Research'. Gender and Education, Volume: 19, Number: 5, pp: 627-646. DOI:1080/09540250701535691
  • Fealy, G. and Harford, J., (2007). Nervous Energy and Administrative Ability’: The Early Lady Principals and Superintendents in Ireland. Journal of Educational
  • Administration and History, Volume: 39, Number: 3, pp: 271-283. DOI:1080/00220620701535774
  • Fitzgerald, T., (2010). 'Spaces In-Between: Indigenous Women
  • Leaders Speak Back To Dominant Discourses In Educational Leadership'. International Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume: 13, Number: 1, pp: 93-105. DOI:10.1080/13603120903242923 Fuller, K., (2010). Talking About Gendered Headship: How Do
  • Women And Men Working In Schools And Articulate Notions Of Gender?. Journal of Educational Administration and History, Volume: 42, Number: 4, pp: 363-382. DOI:1080/00220620.2010.514041
  • Gatenby, B. and Humphries, M., (1999). 'Exploring Gender, Management Education and Careers: Speaking in the Silences'.
  • Gender and Education, Volume: 11, Number: 3, pp: 281-294. DOI:1080/09540259920582
  • Grummell, B., Devine, D., and Lynch, K., (2009). 'The Care-Less
  • Manager: Gender, Care and New Managerialism in Higher Education'. Gender and Education, Volume: 21, Number: 2, pp: 191-20 DOI:10.1080/09540250802392273
  • Isaac, C.A., Behar-Horenstein, L.S., and Koro-Ljungberg, M., (2009). 'Women Deans: Leadership Becoming'. International
  • Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume: 12, Number: 2, pp: 135-1 DOI:10.1080/13603120802485102
  • KSGM., (2011). Türkiye’de Kadının Durumu, Kadının Statüsü Genel
  • Müdürlüğü (General Directorate of the Status of Woman): Ankara. Krüger, M.L., Eck, E.. and Vermeulen, A., (2005). Why Principals Leave: Risk Factors For Premature Departure In The Netherlands
  • For Women And Men. School Leadership and Management, Volume: 25, Number: 3, pp: 241-261. DOI:10.1080/13634230500116322
  • Leathwood, C., (2005). 'Treat Me as a Human Being—Don't Look At
  • Me as a Woman': Femininities and Professional Identities in Further Education'. Gender and Education, Volume: 17, Number: 4, pp: 387-409. DOI:10.1080/09540250500145221
  • Leonard, P., (1998).Gendering Change? Management, Masculinity and the Dynamics of Incorporation. Gender and Education, Volume: 10, Number: 1, pp: 70-83. DOI:10.1080/09540259821104
  • Loder, T.L. and Spillane, J.P., (2005). 'Is A Principal Still A
  • Teacher?: US Women Administrators' Accounts Of Role Conflict And Role Discontinuity'. School Leadership and Management, Volume: 25, Number: 3, pp: 263-279. DOI:10.1080/13634230500116348
  • Luke, C., (1998). 'Cultural Politics and Women in Singapore
  • Higher Education Management'. Gender and Education, Volume: 10, Number: 3, pp: 245-263. DOI:10.1080/09540259820880
  • McLay, M. and Brown, M., (2001). 'Preparation and Training for
  • School Leadership: Case Studies of Nine Women Head Teachers in the Secondary Independent Sector'. School Leadership and Management, Volume: 21, Number: 1, pp: 101-115. DOI:1080/13632430120033063
  • Neale, J. and Özkanlı, Ö., (2010). 'Organizational Barriers for
  • Women in Senior Management: A Comparison of Turkish and New Zealand Universities'. Gender and Education, Volume: 22, Number: 5, pp: 547-563. DOI:10.1080/09540250903524113
  • Oplatka, I. and Atias, M., (2007). Gendered Views Of Managing
  • Discipline In School And Classroom'. Gender and Education, Volume: 19, Number: 1, pp: 41-59. DOI:10.1080/09540250601087751
  • Oplatka, I. and Mimon, R., (2008). Women Principals' Conceptions Of Job Satisfaction And Dissatisfaction: An Alternative View?'.
  • International Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume 11, Number: 2, pp: 135-153. DOI:10.1080/13603120701576225
  • Prichard, C. and Deem, R., (1999). 'Wo-Managing Further
  • Education; Gender and the Construction of the Manager in the Corporate Colleges of England'. Gender and Education, Volume: 11, Number: 3, pp: 323-342. DOI:10.1080/09540259920618
  • Priola, V., (2007). 'Being Female Doing Gender. Narratives of
  • Women in Education Management'. Gender and Education, Volume: 19, Number: 1, pp: 21-40. DOI:10.1080/09540250601087728
  • Rigg, C. and Trehan, K., (1999). 'Not Critical Enough? Black
  • Women Raise Challenges For Critical Management Learning'. Gender and Education, Volume: 11, Number: 3, pp: 265-280. DOI:1080/09540259920573
  • Rusch, E.A. and Marshall, C., (2006). 'Gender Filters and Leadership: Plotting a Course to Equity'. International Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume: 9, Number: 3, pp: 229 - 250. DOI:1080/13603120600741862
  • Shah, S.J.A., (2010). 'Re-Thinking Educational Leadership: Exploring the Impact of Cultural and Belief Systems'.
  • International Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume: 13, Number: 1, pp: 27-44. DOI:10.1080/13603120903244879
  • Sherman, W.H. and Beaty, D.M., (2010). 'Using Feminist Phase
  • Theory to Portray Women in the Principalship across Generations in the USA'. Journal of Educational Administration and History, Volume: 42, Number: 2, pp: 159-180. DOI:1080/00220621003701304
  • Sperandio, J., (2011). 'Context and the Gendered Status of
  • Teachers: Women's Empowerment through Leadership of Non-Formal Schooling In Rural Bangladesh'. Gender and Education, Volume: 23, Number: 2, pp: 121-135. DOI:10.1080/09540251003674097
  • Strachan, J., (1999) 'Feminist Educational Leadership: Locating the Concepts in Practice', Gender and Education, 11(3), 309-322. DOI:1080/09540259920609
  • Strachan, J., Akao, S., Kilavanwa, B., and Warsal, D., (2010).
  • 'You Have To Be A Servant Of All: Melanesian Women's Educational Leadership Experiences'. School Leadership and Management, Volume: 30, Number: 1, pp: 65-76. DOI:10.1080/13632430903509774
  • Thompson, B., (2007). 'Working Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Women
  • Managers in Initial Teacher Training In England'. Gender and Education, Volume: 19, Number: 3, pp: 339-352. DOI:1080/09540250701295494
  • Witherspoon, N. and Taylor, D.L., (2010). 'Spiritual Weapons: Black Female Principals and Religio-Spirituality'. Journal of
  • Educational Administration and History, Volume: 42, Number: 2, pp: 133-158. DOI:10.1080/00220621003701296
  • White, N., (2010). 'Indigenous Australian Women's Leadership: Staying' Strong Against The Postcolonial Tide'. International
  • Journal of Leadership in Education, Volume: 13, Number: 1, pp: 7- DOI:10.1080/13603120903242907
  • Wyn, J., Acker, S., and Richards, E., (2000). 'Making a
  • Difference: Women in Management in Australian and Canadian Faculties of Education'. Gender and Education, Volume: 12, Number: 4, pp: 435-447. DOI:10.1080/09540250020004081