Sezai ÖZKAN, Cihan ADANAŞ, Şeyhmus KAPLAN, Volkan ŞAH

Reliability of Youtube Videos On Knee Joint Injection

Intra-articular injection requires a visual learning and the knee is the most commonly used joint for t his application.YouTube videos have become a source of visual learning. However, there is a obscurity whether YouTube videos onmedical education provide safe and useful information. Therefore, this study aim to evaluate the reliability of YouTubevideos on knee joint injection according to the current approach.The term ʺknee joint injection techniqueʺ was used to search the related YouTube videos. The videos were grouped interms of the uploader, uploading years, and the number of views. The procedure was evaluated and scored for positioningof the patient, palpation of the landmarks, washing hands and wearing gloves, needle approach and entry, drug injection,removing the needle and placing the sponge and finally bandaging.Of the 61 videos, only 11 (18%) had enough quality. The score of videos uploaded by an institution was significantlyhigher than others (p=0.006). The score of videos viewed over (n=31) and lower (n=30) than 10000 times was 4.5 (IQR2.0) and 3.5 (IQR 2.0), respectively (p=0.018). There was no statistical significance between the groups according touploading years (p=0.694).YouTube videos are not enough qualified enaugh reliable visual learning of knee joint injection. The institutional YouTubevideos are more educational sources than others. YouTube videos with higher views count also have higher reli ability.

PDF

___

1. Lockyer J, Sargeant J, Curran V, Fleet L. The transition from face-to-face to online CME facilitation. Med Teach 2006; 28: 625-630.

2. Ozuah PO. Undergraduate medical education: thoughts on future challenges. BMC Med Educ 2002; 2: 8.

3. Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa J, Edelson J, Arora VM. The YouTube generation: implications for medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med 2008; 51: 517-524.

4. "37 Mind Blowing YouTube Facts, Figures and Statistics-2018" Available from: https://fortunelords.com/youtubestatistics 2018

5. Wittich CM, Ficalora RD, Mason TG, Beckman TJ. Musculoskeletal injection. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84: 831-837.

6. Townsend RN, Clark R, Ramenofsky ML, Diamond DL. ATLS-based videotape trauma resuscitation review: education and outcome. J Trauma 1993; 34: 133-138.

7. Şaşmaz M, Akça A. Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS® guideline. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018; 44: 753-757.

8. Cardone DA, Tallia AF. Diagnostic and therapeutic injection of the hip and knee. Am Fam Physician 2003; 67: 2147-2152.

9. Rastogi AK, Davis KW, Ross A, Rosas HG. Fundamentals of Joint Injection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207: 484-494.

10. Weissenbach R. [Technic of injections into the knee]. Vie Med. 1963; 44: 113-114. French. PMID: 13999760.

11. Elicabuk H, Yaylacı S, Yilmaz A, Hatipoglu C, Kaya FG, Serinken M. The Reliability of Turkish """""""Basic Life Support""""""" and """""""Cardiac Massage"" """"" Videos Uploaded to Websites. Eurasian J Med 2016; 48: 15-19.

12. Ho M, Stothers L, Lazare D, Tsang B, Macnab A. Evaluation of educational content of YouTube videos relating to neurogenic bladder and intermittent catheterization. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9: 320-354.

13. Azer SA, AlGrain HA, AlKhelaif RA, AlEshaiwi SM. Evaluation of the Educational Value of YouTube Videos About Physical Examination of the Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e241.

14. Lee JS, Seo HS, Hong TH. YouTube as a potential training method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 2015; 89: 92-97.

15. Rössler B, Lahner D, Schebesta K, Chiari A, Plöchl W. Medical information on the internet: quality assessment of lumbar puncture and neuroaxial block techniques on YouTube. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012; 114: 655-658.

16. Tourinho FSV, Medeiros KSd, Salvador PTCDO, Castro GLT, Santos VEP. Analysis of the YouTube videos on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Rev Col Bras Cir 2012; 39: 335-339.

17. Pitcher GS, Newton DH, Amendola MF. Common femoral artery access on YouTube: what practices are being shown and who is delivering the message? J Surg Educ 2017; 74: 455-458.

18. Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, Burke MJ, Aslam A, Giri SK, et al. YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol 2015; 49: 189- 192.

19. Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V, Hügle T. Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol 2013; 19: 373-376.

20. Karim J, Marwan Y, Dawas A, Esmaeel A, Snell L. Learning knee arthrocentesis using YouTube videos. Clin Teach 2020; 17: 148- 152.

21. Kucukakkas O, Atar E, Berberoglu AH, Karaman CA, Korkmaz MB. YouTube as an information source for intra-articular knee injection. Annals of Medical Research 2019; 26: 918-923.

22. Berman JR, Ben-Artzi A, Fisher MC, Bass AR, Pillinger MH. A comparison of arthrocentesis teaching tools: cadavers, synthetic joint models, and the relative utility of different educational modalities in improving trainees' comfort with procedures. J Clin Rheumatol 2012; 18: 175-179.

23. Chenkin J, Lee S, Huynh T, Bandiera G. Procedures Can Be Learned on the Web: A Randomized Study of Ultrasound‐guided Vascular Access Training. Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15: 949-954.