Assessment of Clinical Features of Tinea Capitis Cases in Erzurum

Assessment of Clinical Features of Tinea Capitis Cases in Erzurum

Tinea capitis is a common fungal infection of the scalp and hair shafts in children. The current study aimed to evaluate 63 p atients with tinea capitis, who had been referred to the dermatology outpatient clinics of two hospitals. Data were collected from the patient files that included the demographic characteristics including age, gender, residing pla ce (rural, urban),the history, duration, contact with animal, patient’s medical history, drugs used, family history, clinical findings, clinical classification, hair loss, fluctuation, lymphadenopathy (LAP), reflection with wood examination, id reaction and hyphae on microscopic examination. The study involved 63 patients with tinea capitis (the mean age was 5,7 years; 69,8% of whom were males). Of patents, 56,6% had inflammatory tinea capitis, 66,7%, had hair loss ,78,3% LAP, 85,5% hyphae and 78,6% reflection with wood examination. Of patients, 71 ,9% were living in rural areas. Tinea capitis is a significant dermatophyte infection in children in Turkey and the role of clinical findings in diagnosis and in treatment should not be ignored.

___

  • 1. Dicle O, Özkesici B. Tinea capitis. Turk J Dermatol. 2013;7:1-8. (in Turkish)
  • 2. Hawkins DM, Smidt AC. Superficial fungal infections in children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2014; 61:443.
  • 3. Kıran R. The clinical apperance of dermatophyte infection of the scalp. Turkiye Klinikleri J Int Med Sci. 2005;31: 3-5. (in Turkish)
  • 4. Baykal C. Dermatoloji atlası. 2. Baskı. İstanbul. ARGOS, 2004;11-30.
  • 5. Patel, GA, Robert AS. Tinea capitis: still an unsolved problem? Mycoses 2011;54:183-188.
  • 6. Çakıroğlu C, Ural A, Kot S, Ergenekon G. Erzurum merkez ilkokullarında mantar infeksiyonları. Bingül Ö,editör. 7. Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi Kitabı’nda. Bursa: Bursa Üniversitesi Basımevi, 1980;314–9.
  • 7. Ertaş R, Kartal D, Utaş S. Clinical evaluation of superficial fungal infections in children. Turk J of Dermatol. 2015;9:186-189. (in Turkish)
  • 8. Aktas E, Karakuzu A, Yigit N. Etiological agents of tinea capitis in Erzurum, Turkey. Journal de Mycologie Médicale/Journal of Medical Mycology 2009; 19: 248-252.
  • 9. Çakla Ö, Bilgili GS, Karadağ AS, Önder S. Retrospective evaluation of 104 tinea capitis cases. Turk J Med Sci. 2013;43:1019-1023. (in Turkish)
  • 10. Akpolat NÖ, Akdeniz S, Elçi S, Atmaca S, Özekinci T. Tinea capitis in Diyarbakır, Turkey. Mycoses 2005;48:8-10.
  • 11. Metin A, Subaşi Ş, Bozkurt H, Çalka Ö. Tinea capitis in Van, Turkey. Mycoses 2002; 45: 492-495.
  • 12. Altindis M, Bilgili E, Kiraz N, Ceri A. Prevalence of tinea capitis in primary schools in Turkey. Mycoses 2003;46:218- 221.
  • 13. Zaraa I, Hawilo A, Aounallah A, et al. Inflammatory Tinea capitis: a 12 year study and a review of the literature. Mycoses 2013; 56: 110-116.
  • 14. Ergenekon G, Ural A. Etiology of tinea capits in Eastern Anatolia. In: Aksungur L. editör 6. Ulusal Dermatoloji Kongresi Kitabı’nda. Çukurova, 1976:p 113. (in Turkish)
  • 15. Roberts BJ., Sheila FF. Tinea capitis: a treatment update. Pediatric annals 2005;34:191-200.
  • 16. Elewski BE. Tinea capitis: a current perspective. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:1-20.
  • 17. Aktaş A. Yüzeyel mantar hastalıkları. Pediatrik dermatoloji. Ed. Tüzün Y, Kotoğyan A, Serdaroğlu S, Çokuğraş H, Tüzün B, Mat MC. İstanbul, Nobel Tıp Kitabevi, 2005;645-654.
Eastern Journal of Medicine-Cover
  • ISSN: 1301-0883
  • Başlangıç: 1996
  • Yayıncı: ERBİL KARAMAN