Meryem DEDELER, EBRU AKÜN, AYŞEGÜL DURAK BATIGÜN

Turkish Adaptation of Adult Parental Acceptance - Rejection Questionnaire Short Form

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, yetişkinlerin çocukluklarında anne ve babalarından algıladıkları kabul-redde dair algılarını değerlendirmede kullanılabilecek Yetişkin Kabul - Red Ölçeği - Kısa Form'un (Yetişkin EKRÖ/K) Türkiye'de normal örneklem için güvenirlik ve geçerliğini belirlemektir. Yöntem: Çalışma, iki ayrı örneklem grubuyla iki aşamada yürütülmüştür. Ölçeğin faktör yapısının belirlendiği ilk aşamada, yaşları 18-63 arasında değişen 424 kadın (%62) 261 erkek (%38) olmak üzere toplam 685 katılımcı yer almıştır. Ölçeğin ölçüt bağıntılı geçerliği, ayırt edici geçerliği ve güvenirliğinin değerlendirildiği ikinci aşamaya ise 18-25 yaş arasında 163'ü kadın (%81) 38'i erkek (%19) olmak üzere toplam 201 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Çalışmada Yetişkin EKRÖ/K'nin yanı sıra, daha önce geçerlik ve güvenirliği saptanmış olan Ana Babaya Bağlanma Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda, ölçeğin Anne Formu için 2'li (kabul ve red), Baba Formu için ise 3'lü (kabul, red ve ihmal) faktör yapısı elde edilmiştir. Ancak doğrulayıcı faktör analizi bulguları, kuramsal olarak ileri sürülen 4-faktörlü yapıda bir maddenin yer değiştirmesi (13. maddenin kayıtsızlık/ihmal yerine sıcaklık/şefkat boyutuna dâhil edilmesi) ile yapılan düzeltilmiş versiyonun, daha iyi uyum indeksi değerlerine sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ölçeğin iyi düzeyde iç tutarlılık, test-tekrar test ve iki yarım test güvenirlik katsayılarına sahip olduğu bulunmuştur. Benzer şekilde, ölçeğin ölçüt bağıntılı ve ayırt edici geçerlik özellikleri de desteklenmiştir. Sonuç: Yetişkin EKRÖ/K, Türkiye'de yürütülen klinik uygulamalarda ve bilimsel araştırmalarda, yetişkinlerin çocukluklarında anne ve babalarından algıladıkları kabul-redde dair anılarını değerlendirmede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir nitelikte bir ölçektir

Yetişkin Ebeveyn Kabul-Red Ölçeği – Kısa Form’un uyarlama çalışması

Objective: The aim of the current study was to examine the reliability and validity of Adult Parental Acceptance - Rejection Questionnaire Short Form (Adult PARQ - Short Form) which can be used to assess adults’ remembrance of parental acceptance-rejection in their childhood, in a normal population in Turkey.Method: The study was conducted with two samples and in two phases. The first study, investigating the factor structure, composed of 424 women (62%) and 261 men (38%), in total 685 subjects between the ages of 18 and 63. A total of 201 university students including 163 women (81%) and 38 men (19%), between the ages of 18 and 25 took part in the second study, evaluating the criterion-related validity, discriminant validity and reliability. In this phase, in addition to Adult PARQ- Short Form, the Parental Bonding Instrument was used. Results: In exploratory factor analysis, Mother Form of the scale revealed two factor structure (acceptance and rejection) and Father Form revealed three factor structure (acceptance, rejection and neglect). However confirmatory factor analysis showed that revised version of the scale which was obtained by displacing one item in the theoretically proposed 4-factor structure (item 13 was included in Warmth/Affection instead of Indifference/Neglect), represented better goodness of fit values. The scale represented good internal consistency, test-retest and split half reliabilities. Similarly, the criterion related and discriminant validity features of the scale were supported. Conclusion: Adult PARQ- Short Form is a reliable and valid instrument evaluating adults’ remembrance of parental acceptance and rejection in their childhood, to use in both clinical applications and scientific researches in Turkey

PDF

___

1. Kessler RC, McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Alhamzawi AO, Alonso J, Angermeyer M, Benjet C, Bromet E, Chatterji S, de Girolamo G, Demyttenaere K, Fayyad J, Florescu S, Gal G, Gureje O, Haro JM, Hu CY, Karam EG, Kawakami N, Lee S, Lepine JP, Ormel J, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Tsang A, Ustun TB, Vassilev S, Viana MC, Williams DR. Childhood adversities and adult psychopathology in the WHO world mental health surveys. Br J Psychiatry 2010; 197:378-385. [CrossRef]
2. Leitenberg H, Gibson LE, Novy PL. Individual differences among undergraduate women in methods of coping with stressful events: the impact of cumulative childhood stressors and abuse. Child Abuse Negl 2004; 28:181-192. [CrossRef]
3. Mallers MH, Charles ST, Neupert SD, Almeida DM. Perceptions of childhood relationships with mother and father: daily emotional and stressor experiences in adulthood. Dev Psychol 2010; 46:1651-1661. [CrossRef]
4. Festinger T, Baker A. Prevalence of recalled childhood emotional abuse among child welfare staff and related well-being factors. Child Youth Serv Rev 2010; 32:520-526. [CrossRef]
5. Petrowski K, Berth H, Schmidt S, Schumacher J, Hinz A, Brahler E. The assessment of recalled parental rearing behavior and its relationship to life satisfaction and interpersonal problems: a general population study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9:17. [CrossRef]
6. McCarthy G, Maughan B. Negative childhood experiences and adult love relationships: the role of internal working models of attachment. Attach Hum Dev 2010; 12:445-461. [CrossRef]
7. Paradis A, Boucher S. Child maltreatment history and interpersonal problems in adult couple relationships. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 2010; 19:138-158. [CrossRef]
8. Riggs SA, Cusimano AM, Benson KM. Childhood emotional abuse and attachment processes in the dyadic adjustment of dating couples. J Couns Psychol 2011; 58:126-138. [CrossRef]
9. Blustein DL., Prezioso MS, Schultheiss DP. Attachment theory and career development current status and future directions. Couns Psychol 1995; 23:416-432. [CrossRef]
10. Harms PD. Adult attachment styles in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review 2011; 21:285-296. [CrossRef]
11. Liu Y, Croft JB, Chapman DP, Perry GS, Greenlund KJ, Zhao G, Edwards VJ. Relationship between adverse childhood experiences and unemployment among adults from five U.S. states. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2013; 48:357-369. [CrossRef]
12. Anda RF, Brown DW, Dube SR, Bremner JD, Felitti VJ, Giles WH. Adverse childhood experiences and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults. Am J Prev Med 2008; 34:396-403. [CrossRef]
13. Chartier MJ, Walker JR, Naimark B. Separate and cumulative effects of adverse childhood experiences in predicting adult health and health care utilization. Child Abuse Negl 2010; 34:454-464. [CrossRef]
14. Brown DW, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Edwards VJ, Malarcher AM, Croft JB, Giles WH. Adverse childhood experiences are associated with the risk of lung cancer: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 2010; 10:1. [CrossRef]
15. Dube SR, Fairweather D, Pearson WS, Felitti VJ, Anda RF, Croft JB. Cumulative childhood stress and autoimmune diseases in adults. Psychosom Med 2009; 71:243-250. [CrossRef]
16. Brown DW, Anda RF, Tiemeier H, Felitti VJ, Edwards VJ, Croft JB, Giles WH. Adverse childhood experiences and the risk of premature mortility. Am J Prev Med 2009; 37:389-396. [CrossRef]
17. Kelly-Irving M, Lepage B, Dedieu D, Bartley M, Blane D, Grosclaude P, Lang T, Delpierre C. Adverse childhood experiences and premature all-cause mortality. Eur J Epidemiol 2013; 28:721-734. [CrossRef]
18. Rohner RP. The warmth dimension: foundations of parental acceptance-rejection theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1986.
19. Rohner RP. The parental “acceptance-rejection syndrome”: universal correlates of perceived rejection. Am Psychol 2004; 59:830-840. [CrossRef]
20. Rohner RP. Introduction to interpersonal acceptance-rejection theory (IPARTheory), methods, evidence, and implications. Retrieved July 10, 2016, from http://csiar.uconn.edu/ introduction-to-partheory/
21. Ali S, Khaleque A, Rohner RP. Pancultural gender differences in the relation between perceived parental acceptance and psychological adjustment of children and adult offspring: a metaanalytic review of worldwide research. J Cross Cult Psychol 2015; 46:1059-1080. [CrossRef]
22. Khaleque A, Rohner RP. Perceived parental acceptance-rejection and psychological adjustment: a meta-analysis of cross-cultural and intracultural studies. J Marriage Fam 2002; 64:54-64. [CrossRef]
23. Khaleque A, Rohner RP. Transnational relations between perceived parental acceptance and personality dispositions of children and adults: a meta-analytic review. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2012; 16:103-115. [CrossRef]
24. Khaleque A, Rohner RP. Pancultural associations between perceived parental acceptance and psychological adjustment of children and adults a meta-analytic review of worldwide research. J Cross Cult Psychol 2012; 43:784-800. [CrossRef]
25. Rohner RP, Khaleque A. Testing central postulates of parental acceptance-rejection theory (PARTheory): a meta-analysis of cross-cultural studies. J Fam Theory Rev 2010; 2:73-87. [CrossRef]
26. Alonso P, Menchón JM, Mataix-Cols D, Pifarré J, Urretavizcaya M, Crespo JM, Jiménez S, Vallejo G, Vallejo J. Perceived parental rearing style in obsessive–compulsive disorder: relation to symptom dimensions. Psychiatry Res 2004; 127:267-278. [CrossRef]
27. Aslan B. Parental rejection and likelihood of suicide: an evaluation in terms of life goals and loneliness. Postgraduate thesis, Ankara University, Ankara, 2014. (Turkish)
28. Campos RC, Besser A, Blatt SJ. Recollections of parental rejection, self-criticism and depression in suicidality. Arch Suicide Res 2013; 17:58-74. [CrossRef]
29. Heider D, Matschinger H, Bernert S, Alonso J, Angermeyer MC; ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 investigators. Relationship between parental bonding and mood disorder in six European countries. Psychiatry Res 2006; 143:89-98. [CrossRef]
30. Rohner RP, Britner PA. Worldwide mental health correlates of parental acceptance-rejection: review of cross-cultural and intracultural evidence. Cross Cult Res 2002; 36:16-47. [CrossRef]
31. Rundell L, Brown CM, Cook RE. Perceived parental rejection has an indirect effect on young women’s drinking to cope. Psychology 2012; 3:935-939. [CrossRef]
32. Salahur E. The relationship between retrospectively perceived parental acceptance-rejection in the childhood and attachment patterns and depressive symptoms of college students. Postgraduate thesis. Hacettepe University, Ankara, 2010. (Turkish)
33. Schwartz SJ, Zamboanga BL, Ravert RD, Kim SY, Weisskirch RS, Williams MK, Bersamin M, Finley GE. Perceived parental relationships and health-risk behaviors in college-attending emerging adults. J Marriage Fam 2009; 71:727-740. [CrossRef]
34. Seganfredo AC, Torres M, Salum GA, Blaya C, Acosta J, Eizirik C, Manfro GG. Gender differences in the associations between childhood trauma and parental bonding in panic disorder. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2009; 31:314-321. [CrossRef]
35. Yazdkhasti F. Social skills and perceived maternal acceptancerejectionin relation to depression in infertile women. Int J Fertil Steril 2011; 5:72-77.
36. Rohner RP. They love me, they love me not: A worldwide study of the effects of parental acceptance and rejection. New Haven: HRAF Press, 1975.
37. Rohner RP, Khaleque A. Personality assessment questionnaire test manual. In Rohner RP, Khaleque A (editors). Handbook for The Study of Parental Acceptance and Rejection. Storrs, CT: Rohner Research Publications, 2005.
38. Varan A. Reliability and validity of PART theory assessment tools in Turkey. Ege University Psychiatry Department (unpublished study), 2003. (Turkish)
39. Rohner R. Parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire (PARQ): Test manual. In Rohner RP, Khaleque A (editors). Handbook for The Study of Parental Acceptance and Rejection. Storrs, CT: Rohner Research Publications, 2005.
40. Senese VP, Bacchini D, Miranda MC, Aurino C, Somma F, Amato G, Rohner RP. The adult parental acceptance–rejection questionnaire: a cross-cultural comparison of Italian and American short forms. Parenting 2016; 16:219-236. [CrossRef]
41. Artemis G, Touloumakos AK. “They accept me, they accept me not”: psychometric properties of the Greek version of the child parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire-short form. J Fam Issues 2014; 37:1226-1243. [CrossRef]
42. Tsaousis I, Giovazolias T, Mascha K. Translation and psychometric properties of the child parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire (PARQ)–short form in the Greek language. In Ripoll-Nu-ez K, Comunian AL, Brown CM (editors). Expanding Horizons: Current Research on Interpersonal Acceptance. Boca Raton, FL: BrownWalker Press, 2012.
43. Gomez R, Suhaimi AF. Malaysian parent ratings of the parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire–short form: factor structure and invariance across girls and boys and mothers and fathers. Parenting 2014; 14:195-214. [CrossRef]
44. Kapci EG, Kucuker S. The parental bonding instrument: evaluation of psychometric properties with Turkish university students. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2006; 17:286-295. (Turkish)
45. Parker G, Tupling H, Brown LB. A parental bonding instrument. Br J Med Psychol 1979; 52:1-10. [CrossRef]
46. Worthington RL, Whittaker TA. Scale development research a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. Couns Psychol 2006; 34:806-838. [CrossRef]
47. Gomez R, Rohner RP. Tests of factor structure and measurement invariance in the United States and Australia using the adult version of the parental acceptance-rejection questionnaire. Cross Cult Res 2011; 45:267-285.
48. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson Education. Inc, 2007.
49. Comunian AL, Gielen UP. An Italian study of parental acceptance and rejection. A Matter of Life: Psychological Theory, Research and Practice 2001; 166-174.
50. Rohner RP, Cournoyer DE. Measurement of the antecedents and consequences of parental acceptance and rejection: reliability of two research questionnaires. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, 1975.
51. Rohner RP, Cournoyer DE. Universals in youths’ perceptions of parental acceptance and rejection: evidence from factor analyses within eight sociocultural groups worldwide. Cross Cult Res 1994; 28:371-383. [CrossRef]
52. Lee SJ, Taylor CA, Bellamy JL. Paternal depression and risk for child neglect in father-involved families of young children. Child Abuse Negl 2012; 36:461-469. [CrossRef]
53. Flouri E. Fathering and child outcomes. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, 2005. [CrossRef]
54. Kuzucu Y. The changing role of fathers and its impact on child development. Turk Journal Psychological Counseling and Guidance 2011; 4:79-91.
55. Najma N, Kausar R. Father acceptance - rejection, father involvement and socio emotional adjustment of adolescents in Pakistan. Journal of Behavioural Sciences 2012; 22:1-22.
56. Rostad WL, Medina AM, Hurtig-Crosby P. Fathers in the dorm room: the unique influence of fathers and mothers on young adult functioning. Fathering 2014; 12:3-17. [CrossRef]
57. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6:1-55. [CrossRef]
58. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2001.
59. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980; 88:588- 606. [CrossRef]
60. Ingles CJ, Hidalgo MD, Mendez FX. Interpersonal difficulties in adolescence: A new self-report measure. Eur J Psychol Assess 2005; 21:11-22. [CrossRef]
61. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage publications, 2009.
62. Nunnally JC, Bernstein, IH. Psychometric theory. Third Ed. New York: McGraw Hill Inc, 1994.