As fear and anxiety rates increase during the COVID-19 crisis, the need to study and screen and treat vulnerable populations is vitally important. Accordingly, the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale, a mental health screener of coronaphobia, has been created to aid this effort. The results of a replication analysis reported here support the diagnostic and psychometric properties of this pandemic-related mental health screener. Considerations of this scale’s use are also discussed.
___
1. Lee SA. Coronavirus Anxiety Scale: A brief mental health screener for COVID-19 related anxiety. Death Stud 2020; 44:393- 401.
2. Wang Y, Zhao X, Feng Q, Liu L, Yao Y, Shi J. Psychological assistance during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. J Health Psychol 2020; 25: 733-737.
3. Lee SA, Jobe MC, Mathis AA. Mental health characteristics associated with dysfunctional coronavirus anxiety. Psychol Med 2020:1-2. DOI: 10.1017/S003329172000121X. [Epub ahead of print].
4. Taylor S. The Psychology of Pandemics: Preparing for the Next Global Outbreak of Infectious Disease. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2019.
5. Asmundson GJG, Taylor S. Coronaphobia: Fear and the 2019- nCoV outbreak. J Anxiety Disord. 2020; 70:102196.
6. Mundt JC, Marks IM, Shear MK, Greist JH. The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning. Br J Psychiatry 2002; 180:461-4.
7. Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. First ed., New York: Guilford Press, 2006.
8. Coronavirus Anxiety Project: The Coronavirus Anxiety Project. https://sites.google.com/cnu.edu/coronavirusanxietyproject/ home. Accessed May 3, 2020.
9. Evren C, Evren B, Dalbudak E, Topcu M, Kutlu N. Measuring anxiety related to COVID-19: A Turkish validation study of the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale. Death Stud 2020 DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1774969 [Online ahead of print].
10. Geisinger KF. Cross-cultural normative assessment: translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychol Assess 1994; 6:304-312.