Zeynep Isil DEMİRCİOGLU, Asli Goncu KOSE

Mediating effects of self-esteem in the relationship between attachment styles and social media addiction among university students

Objective: In the present time, internet and social media have become indispensable parts of our lives. Apart from the advantages of social media, some individuals have begun to suffer from Social Media Addiction (SMA) which is associated with dysfunctions in academic and/or work domains. Although outcomes of SMA have been relatively widely investigated, its predictive factors have not been studied extensively yet. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of secure, fearful, and preoccupied attachment styles on SMA and the mediating role of self-esteem in the links between attachment styles and SMA.Method: Data were collected from 455 university students (300 females, 155 males) who volunteered to complete the survey package that included SMA Scale, Relationships Questionnaire, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.Results: The data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling and moderated multiple regression. The results revealed that preoccupied and fearful attachment had significant positive direct effects on SMA. While the link of preoccupied attachment with SMA was partially mediated, the relationship between secure attachment and SMA was fully mediated by self-esteem. In addition, exploratory analyses revealed that gender moderated the relationship between self-esteem and SMA.Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that fearful attachment and preoccupied attachment can be risk factors for SMA among university students. On the other hand, being securely attached and having high self-esteem can be protective factors for SMA.

PDF

___

1. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK). Internet activities of individuals who have accessed the Internet in the last 3 months for private purposes. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1028# Accessed May 16, 2019.

2. van den Eijnden RJJM, Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM. The social media disorder scale. Comput Hum Behav 2016; 61:478-487.

3. Ryan T, Chester A, Reece J, Xenos S. The uses and abuses of Facebook: a review of Facebook addiction. J Behav Addict 2014; 3:133-148.

4. Andreassen CS. Online social network site addiction: a comprehensive review. Curr Addict Rep 2015; 2:175-184.

5. Fox J, Rooney MC. The Dark Triad and trait self-objectification as predictors of men’s use and self-presentation behaviors on social networking sites. Pers Individ Diff 2015; 76:161-165.

6. Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Schouten AP. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006; 9:584-590.

7. Blackwell D, Leaman C, Tramposch R, Osborne C, Liss M. Extraversion, neuroticism, attachment style and fear of missing out as predictors of social media use and addiction. Pers Individ Diff 2017; 116:69-72.

8. Monacis L, de Palo V, Griffiths MD, Sinatra M. Exploring individual differences in online addictions: the role of identity and attachment. Int J Ment Health Addict 2017; 15:853-868.

9. Bowlby J. A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

10. Ainsworth, MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Oxford: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.

11. Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991; 61:226-244.

12. Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 58:644-663.

13. Caplan SE. Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006; 10:234-242.

14. Weidman AC, Fernandez KC, Levinson CA, Augustine AA, Larsen R J, Rodebaugh TL. Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Pers Individ Diff 2012; 53:191-195.

15. Hart J, Nailling E, Bizer GY, Collins CK. Attachment theory as a framework for explaining engagement with Facebook. Pers Individ Diff 2015; 77:33-40.

16. Jenkins-Guarnieri MA, Wright SL, Johnson BD. The interrelationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Psychol Pop Media Cult 2013; 2:117-131.

17. Schimmenti A, Passanisi A, Gervasi AM, Manzella S, Fama FI. Insecure attachment attitudes in the onset of problematic Internet use among late adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2014; 45:588-595.

18. Nitzburg GC, Farber BA. Putting up emotional (Facebook) walls? Attachment status and emerging adults’ experiences of social networking sites. J Clin Psychol 2013; 69:1183-1190.

19. Rosenberg M. Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). “Acceptance and Commitment Therapy”, Measures Package 1965; 61(52).

20. Trzesniewski KH, Donnellan MB, Moffitt TE, Robins RW, Poulton R, Caspi A. Low self-esteem during adolescence predicts poor health, criminal behavior, and limited economic prospects during adulthood. Dev Psychol 2006; 42:381-390.

21. Baumeister RF, Campbell JD, Krueger JI, Vohs KD. Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychol Sci Public Interest 2003; 4:1-44.

22. Proctor CL, Linley PA, Maltby J. Youth life satisfaction: a review of the literature. J Happiness Stud 2009; 10:583-630.

23. McAdams TA, Rijsdijk FV, Narusyte J, Ganiban JM, Reiss D, Spotts E, et al. Associations between the parent-child relationship and adolescent self‐worth: a genetically informed study of twin parents and their adolescent children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2017; 58:46-54.

24. Armsden GC, Greenberg MT. The inventory of parent and peer attachment: individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 1987; 16:427-454.

25. Noom MJ, Dekovic M, Meeus WH. Autonomy, attachment and psychosocial adjustment during adolescence: a double-edged sword? J Adolesc 1999; 22:771-783.

26. Arbona C, Power TG. Parental attachment, self-esteem, and antisocial behaviors among African American, European American, and Mexican American adolescents. J Couns Psychol 2003; 50:40-51.

27. Birkeland MS, Melkevik O, Holsen I, Wold B. Trajectories of global self-esteem development during adolescence. J Adolesc 2012; 35:43-54.

28. Leary MR, Baumeister RF. The nature and function of self-esteem: sociometer theory. Adv Exp Social Psychol 2000; 32:1-62.

29. Anthony DB, Wood JV, Holmes JG. Testing sociometer theory: self-esteem and the importance of acceptance for social decision-making. J Exp Soc Psychol 2007; 43:425-432.

30. Leary MR, MacDonald G. Individual differences in self-esteem: a review and theoretical integration: In Leary MR, Tangney JP (editors). Handbook of Self and Identity. New York: The Guilford Press, 2003, 401-418.

31. Forest AL, Wood JV. When social networking is not working: individuals with low self-esteem recognize but do not reap the benefits of self-disclosure on Facebook. Psychol Sci 2012; 23:295-302.

32. Reis, HT, Shaver P. Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process: In Duck S, Hay DF, Hobfoll SE, Ickes W, Montgomery B M (editors). Handbook of Personal Relationships. Chichester, England: John Wiley and Sons, 1988, 367-389.

33. Marshall TC, Lefringhausen K, Ferenczi N. The Big Five, self-esteem, and narcissism as predictors of the topics people write about in Facebook status updates. Pers Individ Diff 2015; 85:35-40.

34. Błachnio A, Przepiorka A, Rudnicka P. Narcissism and self-esteem as predictors of dimensions of Facebook use. Pers Individ Diff 2016; 90:296-301.

35. Andreassen CS, Pallesen S, Griffiths, MD. The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: findings from a large national survey. Addict Behav 2017; 64:287-293.

36. Tutgun-Unal A, Deniz L. Development of the Social Media Addiction Scale. AJIT-e 2015; 6:51-70. (Turkish)

37. Sumer N, Gungor D. Psychometric evaluation of adult attachment style scales in a Turkish sample and intercultural comparison. Turkish Journal of Psychology 1999; 14:71-106.

38. Cohen O, Finzi-Dottan R. Parent-child relationships during the divorce process; from attachment theory and intergenerational perspective. Contemp Fam Ther 2005; 27:81-99.

39. Lench HC, Quas JA, Edelstein RS. My child is better than average: the extension and restriction of unrealistic optimism. J Appl Soc Psychol 2006; 36:2963-2979.

40. Moller AC, Roth G, Niemiec CP, Kanat-Maymon Y, Deci EL. Mediators of the associations between parents’ conditional regard and the quality of their adult-children’s peer-relationships. Motiv Emot 2019; 43:35-51.

41. Guloglu B, KarairmakO. Attachment styles and psychological tendencies in intimate relations in paternal loss in early childhood. Turkish Journal of Psychological Counseling and Guidance 2017; 7:99-115. (Turkish)

42. Imamoglu S, Imamoglu EO. Relationship between general and context-specific attachment orientations in a Turkish sample. J Soc Psychol 2006; 146:261-274.

43. Zeyrek EY, Gencoz F, Bergman Y, Lester D. Suicidality, problem-solving skills, attachment style, and hopelessness in Turkish students. Death Stud 2009; 33:815-827.

44. Cuhadaroglu F. (1986). Self-esteem in adolescents. Specialization Thesis, Hacettepe University Medical Faculty Psychiatry Department, Ankara, 1986. (Turkish)

45. Arbuckle JL. Amos (Version 22.0), Computer Program, SPSS/IBM, Chicago, 2013.

46. McDonald RP, Ho M-HR. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods 2002; 7:64-82.

47. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M R. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. EJBRM 2008; 6:53-60.

48. Edlund, J.E, Sagarin BJ. Sex differences in jealousy: a 25-year retrospective. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 2017; 55:259-302.

49. George C, Kaplan N, Main M. Adult attachment interview. Unpublished manuscript 1996. http://library.allanschore.com/docs/AAIProtocol.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2019.

50. Chen A. From attachment to addiction: the mediating role of need satisfaction on social networking sites. Comput Human Behav 2019; 98:80-92.

51. Monacis L, De Palo V, Griffiths MD, Sinatra M. Social networking addiction, attachment style, and validation of the Italian version of the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale. J Behav Addict 2017; 6:178-186.

52. Demircioglu ZI, Goncu Kose A. Effects of attachment styles, dark triad, rejection sensitivity, and relationship satisfaction on social media addiction: a mediated model. Curr Psychol 2018.

53. Savcı M, Aysan F. The role of attachment styles, peer relations, and affections in predicting Internet addiction. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions 2016; 3:401-432.

54. Eichenberg C, Schott M, Decker O, Sindelar B. Attachment style and internet addiction: an online survey. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e170.

55. Cacioppo M, Barni D, Correale C, Mangialavori S, Danioni F, Gori A. Do attachment styles and family functioning predict adolescents’ problematic internet use? A relative weight analysis. J Child Fam Stud 2019; 28:1263-1271.

56. Man KO, Hamid PN. The relationship between attachment prototypes, self-esteem, loneliness and causal attributions in Chinese trainee teachers. Pers Individ Diff 1998; 24:357-371.

57. Andreassen CS, Billieux J, Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, Demetrovics Z, Mazzoni E, et al. The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: A large-scale cross-sectional study. Psychol Addict Behav 2016; 30:252-262.

58. Skinner BF. Contingencies of Reinforcement. East Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.

59. Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1965.

60. Chou WYS, Hunt YM, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res 2009; 11:e48.