SOCRATİC METHOD: ITS ROLE IN THE COGNİTİVE DOMAİN OF BLOOM'S TAXONOMY AND ITS USE

Sokrates hem felsefe alanında hem de edebiyat ve eğitim gibi diğer alanlarda önemli bir figürdür. Sokratik Yöntem ya da diyalektik yöntem denilen ve doğruya ulaşmak için sorulan bir dizi soru ve cevaptan oluşan yöntemi geliştirmiştir. Milattan önce 4. yüzyıldan bu yana, soru sorma becerisi en doğru bilgiye ulaşmak için kullanılan önemli bir strateji olarak düşünülmüş ve Benjamin Bloom tarafından yapılan sınıflandırmada da önemli bir yer tutmuştur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Sokratik Yöntem’in önemini ve Bloom’un sınıflandırmasının Bilişsel Alan’ındaki yerini vurgulamak ve yüksek düzey İngiliz Edebiyatı sınıflarında Eflatun’un Devlet adlı eserini öğretmedeki önemli rolünü açığa çıkarmaktır

SOCRATİC METHOD: ITS ROLE IN THE COGNİTİVE DOMAİN OF BLOOM'S TAXONOMY AND ITS USE

Socrates has been a very important figure not only in the field of philosophy but also in other specific fields such as literature and education. He developed Socratic Method or the method of dialectic which was based upon a process of questions and answers so as to reach the truth. Since the 4th century B.C., the ability to question has been considered an important strategy in order to gather the most correct pieces of information and an important part of the cognitive domain of the taxonomy made by Benjamin Bloom. The aim of this paper is to state the importance of Socratic Method and indicate its significant place in the cognitive domain of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives and its role in advanced ELT literature classes while teaching Plato’s Republic

___

  • Baker, P. J. (1981). Learning Sociology and Assessing Critical Thinking, Teaching Sociology, 8 (3), 325-363.
  • Bloom, B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: The Cognitive Domain, New York: David McKay Co Inc.
  • Demirel, Ö. (2006). Kuramdan Uygulamaya Öğretimde Planlama ve Değerlendirme, Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Dilworth, Jr., C. B. (1980). Asking Questions about Literature: A Review of Strategies, Journal of Aesthetic Education, 14 (2), 43-54.
  • Dryden, J. (1979). Xenophon in Seven Volumes, 4. Cambridge: Harward University Press.
  • Garlikov, R. (2005). The Socratic Method: Teaching by Asking Instead of by Telling, Retrieved from the WWW: http://www.garlikov.com/Soc_Meth.html on April 1, 2009.
  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview, Theory into Practice, 41 (4), 212-218.
  • Magee, B. (2001). The Story of Philosophy, New York: Dorling Kindersley.
  • Maxwell, M. (2009). The Socratic Method and Its Effect on Critical Thinking, Retrieved from the WWW: http://www.socraticmethod.net/ on April 1, 2009. Merritts, D., Walter, R. Using Socratic Questioning, Retrived, March 24, 2005, from http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/socratic/index.html.
  • Nicoteri, J. A. (1998). Critical Thinking Skills. The American Journal of Nursing, 98 (10), 62-65.
  • Paraskevas, A., Wickens, E. (2003). Andragogy and the Socratic Method: The Adult Perspective, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 2 (2), 4-14.
  • Paul, R., Elder, L. (2002). The Art of Asking Essential Questions, Sonoma, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
  • Scanlan, J. S. (2006). The Effect of Richard Paul’s Universal Elements and Standards of Reasoning on Twelfth Grade Composition, Unpublished M.A. Thesis, San Diego: Alliant International University, Faculty of the School of Education.
  • Tan, Ş. (2007). Öğretimi Planlama ve Değerlendirme, Ankara: Öncü Basım Yayım Tanıtım Ltd. Şti.
  • Whiteley, T. R. (2006). Using the Socratic Method and Bloom’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain to Enhance Online Discussion, Critical Thinking and Student Learning, Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 33, 65-70.
  • Yang, Y. T. C., Newby, T. J., Bill, R. L. (2005). Using Socratic Questioning to Promote Critical Thinking Skills Through Asynchronous Discussion Forums in Distance Learning Environments, The American Journal of Distance Education, 19 (3), 163-181.