___

• Nesbit, RM. Congenital curvature of the phallus: Report of three cases with description of corrective operation. J Urol 1965; 93: 230-232.
• Gholami SS, Lue TF. Peyronie's disease. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 377-390.
• Lindsay MB, Schain DM, Grambsch P, Benson RC, Beard CM, Kurland LT. The incidence of Peyronie’s disease in Rochester, Minnesota 1950 through 1984. J Urol 1991; 146:1007-1009.
• La Pera G, Pescatori ES, Calabrese M, et al. Peyronie’s disease: prevalence and association with cigarette smoking. A multicenter population-based study in men aged 50–69 years. Eur Urol 2001; 40:525-530.
• Carrieri MP, Serraino D, Palmiotto F, Nucci G, Sasso F. A case-control study on risk factors for Peyronie's disease. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 511-515.
• Gholami SS, Gonzalez-Cadavid NF, Lin CS, Rajfer J, Lue TF. Peyronie’s disease: a review. J Urol 2003;169: 1234–1241.
• Gelbard MK, Dorey F, James K. The natural history of Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1990; 144: 1376-1379.
• Mynderse LA, Minga M. Oral therapy for Peyronie’s Disease. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: 340-344.
• Pryor J, Akkus E, Alter G, et al. Priapism, Peyronie’s disease, penile reconstructive surgery. In Lue TF, Basson R, Rosen R, Gıiliano F, Khoury S, Montorsi F, eds. Sexual Medicine, Sexual dysfunctions in men and women, Health publications, 2004;383-409.
• Montorsi F, Salonia A, Maga T, et al. Evidence based assessment of long-term results of plaque incision and vein grafting for Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 2000;163: 1704-1708.
• Levine LA, Lenting EL. A surgical algorithm for the treatment of Peyronie's disease. J Urol 1997; 158: 2149- 2152.
• Tornehl CK, Carson CC. Surgical alternatives for treating Peyronie’s disease. BJU Int 2004; 94: 774-783.
• Tornehl C, Carson CC. Surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Urol Clin N Am 2005; 32: 479-485.
• Pryor JP, Fitzpatrick JM. Anew approach to correction of the penile deformity in Peyronie’s disease. J Urol 1979;122:622-623.
• Rehman J, Benet A, Minsky LS, Melman A. Results of surgical treatment for abnormal penile curvature: Peyronie’s disease and congenital deviation by modified Nesbit plication. J Urol 1997;157:1288–1291.
• Licht MR, Lewis RW. Modified Nesbit procedure for the treatment of Peyronie's disease: A comparative outcome analysis. J Urol 1997; 15: 460-463.
• Mufti GR, Aitchison M, Bramwell SP, Paterson PJ, Scott R. Corporeal plication for surgical correction of Peyronie's disease. J Urol 1990; 144: 281-282.
• Pryor JP. Correction of penile curvature in Peyronie’s disease: why I prefer the Nesbit technique. Int J Impotence Res 1998; 10: 129-131.
• Savoca G, Thrombetta C, Ciampalini S, De Stefani S, Buttazzi L, Belgrano E. Long-term results with Nesbit’s procedure as treatment of Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impotence Res 2000; 12: 289-293.
• Syed AH, Abbasi Z, Hargreave TB. Nesbit procedure for disabling Peyronie’s curvature. a median follow-up of 84 months. Urology 2003; 61: 999-1003.
• Ralph DJ, Al-Akraa M, Pryor JP. The Nesbit operation for Peyronie's disease: 16-year experience. J Urol 1995; 4: 1362-1363.
• Yachia D. Modified corporoplasty for the treatment of penile curvature. J Urol 1990; 143:80-82.
• Lemberger RJ, Bishop MC, Bates CP. Nesbit’s operation for Peyronie’s disease. Br J Urol 1984; 56:721-723.
• Daitch JA, Angermeier KW, Montague DK. Modified corporoplasty for penile curvature. Long term results and patient satisfaction. J Urol 1999; 162: 2006-2009.
• Sulaiman MN, Gingell JC. Nesbit’s procedure for penile curvature. J Androl 1994; 15: 54-56.
• Essed E, Schroeder F. New surgical treatment for Peyronie disease. Urology 1985; 25: 582-587.
• Van der Drift DG, Vroege JA, Groenedijk PM, Slob AK, Schroder FH, Mikisch GH. The plication procedure for penile curvature. Surgical outcome and postoperative sexual functioning. Urol Int 2002; 69: 120-124.
• Chahal R, Gogoi NK, Sundaram SK, Weston PM. Corporal plication for penile curvature caused by Peyronie’s disease: the patients’ perspective. BJU Int 2001; 87: 352-356.
• Thiounn N, Missirliu A, Zerbib M, et al. Corporeal plication for surgical correction of penile curvature. Experience with 60 patients. Eur Urol 1998; 33: 401-404.
• Geertsen UA, Brok KE, Andersen B, Nielsen HV. Peyronie curvature treated by plication of the penile fasciae. Br J Urol 1996; 77: 733-735.
• Nooter RI, Bosch JL, Schroder FH. Peyronie’s disease and congenital penile curvature: long-term results of operative treatment with the plication procedure. Br J Urol 1994; 74: 497-500.
• Van Der Horst C, Martinez Portillo FJ, Seif C, Alken P,
• Juenemann KP. Treatment of penile curvature with
• Essed–Schroder tunical plication: aspects of quality of
• life from the patients’ perspective. BJU Int 2004; 93:105- 108.
• Gholami SS, Lue TF. Correction of penile curvature using the 16-dot plication technique: A review of 132 patients. J Urol 2002; 167: 2066-2069.