ANESTEZİYOLOJİ VE REANİMASYON ALANINDA COVID-19 HAKKINDA EN ÇOK ALINTI YAPILAN 100 MAKALENİN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ

Amaç: Covid-19'un ortaya çıkışından bu yana, bu konudaki yayınların sayısı önemli ölçüde artmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon alanında Covid-19 ile ilgili literatürde en çok atıf alan 100 yayını bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu tanımlayıcı kesitsel çalışma için, "Institute for Scientific Information Web of Science"ın “gelişmiş mod" özelliğinde, ‘’Covid-19’’, ‘’Covid-2019’’, ‘’SARS-coV-2’’ ve ‘’Pandemic’’ gibi uygun anahtar kelimeler kullanılarak en çok alıntı yapılan ilk 100 yayın belirlendi. Grupların karşılaştırılmasında Kruskal Wallis testi ve Mann Whitney U testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: 26 Ekim 2020’ye kadar Covid-19 konusunda anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon alanında, toplam 842 yayın olduğu belirlendi. En fazla atıf alan çalışma 220 atıfa sahipken, en düşük atıf sayısı 5 olarak belirlendi. En fazla atıf alan ilk 106 çalışmanın toplam atıf sayısının ortalaması 21.38±31.18 olarak belirlendi. Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon alanında Covid-19 ile ilişkili en çok atıf alan ilk 106 çalışmanın, odaklandığı alanlar incelendiğinde ilk üç alan içinde sırasıyla; Covid-19’dan korunma (%24), Covid-19 stratejisi (%23) ve Covid-19 konusunda deneyim ve öneriler (%19) gelmekteydi. En çok atıf alan yayınların olduğu dergiler ise sırasıyla, Anaesthesia ve Analgesia (%24), Anaesthesia (%21) ve British Journal of Anaesthesia (%17) olduğu tespit edildi. Sonuç: Çalışmamız anesteziyoloji ve reanimasyon literatüründe, Covid-19 ile ilgili en çok atıf alan ilk 106 çalışmanın değerlendirilip analiz edildiği ilk çalışmadır. Çalışmamızda; ülkeler, dergiler, kurumlar, yazarlar, terimler ve anahtar kelimeler açısından odak noktaları, araştırma sıcak noktaları ve bu alandaki önemli konular ortaya konulmaktadır. Hastalıktan korunma, strateji, deneyim ve önlemler en çok odaklanılan konular olmuştur.

Bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles about COVID-19 in Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Objective: Since the advent of Covid-19, the number of publications on the subject has increased significantly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the 100 most cited publications on Covid-19 in the field of anesthesiology and resuscitation in terms of their bibliometric properties Materials and Methods: For this descriptive cross-sectional study, " the first 100 publications with the most citations were determined in the "Advanced Mode" feature of the "Institute of Scientific Information Web of Science" by using suitable keywords such as "Pandemic”, "Covid-19", "Covid-2019", "SARS-coV-2" . The Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann Whitney U-test were used in the comparison of the groups. Results: As of October 26 2020, it was determined that there are 842 publications available on Covid-19 in the field of anesthesiology and reanimation. While the most frequently cited study had 220 citations, the lowest number of citations was determined to be five. The first three focus areas of the 106 most cited studies on Covid-19 were protection from Covid-19 (24%), Covid-19 strategies (23%), and experience and recommendations about Covid-19 (19%). The journals with the highest number of citations were Anesthesia and Analgesia (24%), Anesthesia (21%) and British Journal of Anesthesia (17%), respectively. Conclusion: Our study is the first to evaluate and analyze the first 106 most cited studies on Covid-19 in the anesthesiology and reanimation literature. In our study; focal points, research hotspots and important issues in this field are presented in terms of countries, journals, institutions, authors, terms and keywords. Prevention, strategy, experience and precautions were the most focused topics.

PDF

___

1. World Health Organization Coronavirus Disease (COVID 19) Dashboard. [cited: 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https: //who.sprinklr.com/
2. Coronavirus.jhu.edu. [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: https: //coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html
3. Cook TM, El Boghdadly K, McGuire B, McNarry AF, Patel A, Higgs A. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID 19. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(6):785 99. doi: 10.1111/anae.15054.
4. Dexter F, Parra MC, Brown JR, Loftus RW. Perioperative COVID 19 Defense: An Evidence Based Approach for Optimization of Infection Control and Operating Room Management. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(1):37 42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004829
5. Ludwig S, Zarbock A. Coronaviruses and SARS CoV 2: A Brief Overview. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):93 96. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004845.PMID: 32243297
6. Loftus RW, Campos JH. The anesthetists’ role in periopera tive infection control: what is the action plan? Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:531–4.
7. Lou J, Tian SJ, Niu SM, Kang XQ, Lian HX, Zhang LX, Zhang JJ. Coronavirus disease 2019: a bibliometric analysis and review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(6):3411 21. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202003_20712.
8. Choudhri AF, Siddiqui A, Khan NR, Cohen HL.Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis. Radiographics.2015;35(3):736 46. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140036. PMID: 25969932
9. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(46): 16569–72.
10. Buyukcoban S, Oner O, Hancı V. A Bibliometric Analysis of the most cited articles in geriatric anaesthesia. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics. 2020;23(3):410 8. doi: 10.31086/tjgeri.2020.177
11. Pitlik SD.. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2020 ; 11(3):e0027. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10418.
12. Moradian et al. The urgent need for integrated science to fight COVID 19 pandemic and beyond. J Transl Med .2020;18:205 doi:10.1186/s12967 020 02364 2.
13. Chahrour M et al. A Bibliometric Analysis of COVID 19 Research Activity: A Call for Increased Output. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7357. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7357.
14. Cheung JCH, Ho LT, Cheng JV, Cham EYK, Lam KN. Staff safety during emergency airway management for COVID 19 in Hong Kong. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(4):e19. doi:10.1016/s2213 2600(20)30084 9.
15. Xiang B, Li P, Yang X, Zhong S, Manyande A, Feng M. The impact of novel coronavirus SARS CoV 2 among healthcare workers in hospitals: An aerial overview. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(8):915 7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.020.
16. Forrester DJ, Nassar KA, Maggio MP, Hawn TM. Precautions for Operating Room Team Members During the COVID 19 Pandemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2020;230(6):1098 101. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.030.
17. Wong J, Goh QY, Tan Z, Lie SA, Tay YC, Ng SY, et al. Preparing for a COVID 19 pandemic: a review of operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in Singapore. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67(6):732 45. doi: 10.1007/s12630 020 01620 9.
18. Ti LK, Ang LS, Foonge TW, Ng BSW. What we do when a COVID 19 patient needs an operation: operating room preparation and guidance. Can J Anesth. 2020;67(6):756 8.
19. Peng PW, Ho PL, Hota SS. Outbreak of a new coronavirus: what anaesthetists should know. Br J Anesth. 2020;124(5):497 501. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.02.008.
20. Coimbra R et al. European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES) recommendations for trauma and emergency surgery preparation during times of COVID 19 infection. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020;46:505–10. doi:10.1007/s00068 020 01364 7.
21. Vinh DB, Zhao X, Kiong KL, Guo T, Jozaghi Y, Yao C, et al. Overview of COVID 19 testing and implications for otolaryngologists. Head Neck. 2020;42(7):1629 33. doi: 10.1002/hed.26213.
22. 23.Paraksh L, Dahar AS, Mushtaq M. COVID 19 in the operating room: a review of evolving safety protocols. Patient Saf Surg . 2020;14:30. doi: 10.1186/s13037 020 00254 6.eCollection 2020.
23. Dong Y, Mo X, Hu Y, Qi X, Jiang F, Jiang Z, et al. Epidemiology of COVID 19 Among Children in China. Pediatrics. 2020; 145(6):e20200702. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020 0702.
24. Kelvin AA, Halperin S. COVID 19 in children: the link in the transmission chain. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:633–34.
25. American College of Surgeons. COVID 19 Guidelines for Triage of Pediatric Patients [Internet]. American College of Surgeons [cited 2020 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/covid 19/clinicalguidance/ elective case/pediatric surgery.
26. American College of Surgeons. Create a Surgical Review Committee for COVID 19 Related Surgical Triage Decision Making [Internet]. American College of Surgeons [cited 2020 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/covid 19/clinical guidance/review committee.
27. Dedeilia A et al. Pediatric surgery during the COVID 19 pandemic. World J Clin Pediatr. 2020; 9(2):7 16. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v9.i2.7.
28. ElHawary H, Salimi A, Diab N, Smith L. Bibliometric Analysis of Early COVID 19 Research: The Top 50 Cited Papers. Infect Dis (Auckl). 2020;13:1178633720962935
29. Brown A, Horton R. A planetary health perspective on COVID 19: a call for papers. Lancet 2020;395:1099.
30. Arrizabalaga O, Otaegui D, Vergara I, Arrizabalaga J, Méndez E. Open Access of COVID 19 related publications in the first quarter of 2020: a preliminary study based in PubMed. F1000Res. 2020;9:649. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.24136.2.
31. Fontelo P, Liu F. A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13643 018 0819 1.
32. Yeo Teh NSL, Tang BL. An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID 19). Account Res. 2021; 28(1):47 53. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1782203.