___

• Abbott, R., & Ryan, T. (1999). Constructing knowledge, reconstructing schooling, Educational Leadership, 57(3), 66-69.
• Andersson, B., & Karrqvist, C. (1983). How Swedish pupils aged 12-15 years understand light and its properties. European Journal of Science Education, 5(4), 387-402.
• Asan, A., ve Gönül, G. (2000). Oluşturmacı öğrenme yaklaşımına göre hazırlanmış örnek bir ünite etkinliği. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 147.
• Aydın, S. (2007). Eliminating the misconceptions about geometric optics by conceptual change texts. Unpublished dissertation. Atatürk University, Erzurum.
• Aydoğan, S., Güneş, B., ve Gülçiçek, Ç. (2003). Isı ve sıcaklık konusunda kavram yanılgıları. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2), 111-124.
• Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82(3), 343-356.
• Blake, A. (2004). Helping young children to see what is relevant and why: Supporting cognitive change in earth science using analogy. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1855-1873.
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn. National Academy Press, Washington.
• Chen, C. C., Lin H. S., & Lin M. L. (2002). Developing a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding the formation of images by plane mirror. Proceedings of the National Science Council, 12(3), 106-121.
• Cooper, P. A. (1993). Paradigm shifts in designed instruction: From behaviorism to cognitivism to constructivism. Educational Technology, 33(5), 12-19.
• Çalık, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of an analogy activity in improving students' conceptual change for solution chemistry concepts. International journal of science and mathematics education, 7(4), 651-676.
• Djanette, B., & Fouad, C. (2014). Determination of university students' misconceptions about light using concept maps. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 152, 582-589.
• Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories - in action: Some theoritical and empirical issues in the study of students' conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37-60.
• Fetherstonhaugh, T., & Treagust, D. F. (1992). Students' understanding of light and its properties: teaching to engender conceptual change. Science Education, 76, 653-672.
• Galili, I., Goldberg, F., & Bendall, S. (1991). Some reflections on plane mirrors and images. The Physics Teacher, 29, 471-477.
• Galili, I. (1996). Student's conceptual change in geometrical optics. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 847-868.
• Galili, I. & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners' knowledge in optics: interpretation, structure and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57-88.
• Geban, Ö., Uzuntiryaki, E., Akçay, H., Kılıç, S., ve Alpat, Ş. (1999). Kavram haritalama ve benzeşme yöntemi ile mol kavramı öğretimi. III. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Sempozyumu.
• Hewson, P. W., & Hewson, M. G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13(1), 1.
• Goldberg and H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 59-73). Kiel.
• Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (Special issue), 541-553.
• Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok‐Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry‐type chemistry laboratories. Journal of research in science teaching, 42(7), 791-806.
• Hubber, P. (2005a). Secondary student's perceptions of a constructivist - informed teaching and learning environment for geometric optics. Teaching Science, 51(1), 26-29.
• Hubber, P. (2005b). Explorations of year 10 students' conceptual change during instruction. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(1), Article 1.
• Jonassen, D. H., & Strobel, J. (2006). Modeling for meaningful learning. In Engaged learning with emerging technologies (pp.1-27). Springer Netherlands.
• Kabapınar, F. (2003). Kavram yanılgılarının ölçülmesinde kullanılabilecek bir ölçeğin bilgi kavrama düzeyini ölçmeyi amaçlayan ölçekten farklılıkları, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 35, 398-417.
• Kocakülah, M. S. (1999). A study of the development of Turkish first year university students' understanding of electromagnetism and the implications for instruction. EdD thesis. The University of Leeds, School of Education, Leeds.
• Kocakülah, A. (2006). Geleneksel öğretimin ilk, orta ve yükseköğretim öğrencilerinin görüntü oluşumu ve renklere ilişkin kavramsal anlamalarına etkisi, Doktora Tezi, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Balıkesir.
• Koray, Ö., Köksal, M. S., Özdemir, M., & Presley, A. İ. (2007). The effect of creative and critical thinking based laboratory applications on academic achievement and science process skills. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 377-389.
• Kroothkaew, S., & Srisawasdi, N. (2013). Teaching how light can be refracted using simulationbased inquiry with a dual-situated learning model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 2023-2027.
• La Rosa C., Mayer, M., Patrizi, P., & Vincentini M. (1984). Commonsense knowledge in optics: Preliminary results of an investigation into the properties of light. European Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 387-397.
• Masters, M. F., & Grove, T. T. (2010). Active learning in intermediate optics through concept building laboratories. American Journal of Physics, 78(5), 485-491.
• McClintock, C. (1985). Process sampling: A method for case study research of administrative behavior, Educational Administration Quarterly, 21, 205-222.
• Perales, F. J., & Nievas, F. (1995). Teaching geometric optics: Research, results and educational implications. Research in Science and Technological Education, 13(2), 187.
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211- 227.
• Schwedes, H., & Schmidt, D. (1992). Conceptual change: A case study and theoretical comments. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an international workshop (pp. 188 - 202). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education at the University of Kiel.
• Şen, A. İ. (2003). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin ışık, görme ve aynalar konusundaki kavram yanılgılarının ve öğrenme zorluklarının incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25, 176-185.
• Taşlıdere, E., & Eryılmaz, A. (2015). Assessment of pre-service teachers' misconceptions in geometrical optics via a three-tier misconception test. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 269-289.
• Tekos, G., & Solomonidou, C. (2009). Constructivist learning and teaching of optics concepts using ICT tools in Greek primary school: A pilot study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(5), 415-428.
• Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Pres.
• Thorley, N. R. (1990). The role of the conceptual change model in the interpretation of classroom interaction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Wisconsin).
• Tyson, L. M., Venville, G. J., Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1997). A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom. Science Education, 81, 387-404.
• Uzun, S., Alev, N., & Karal, I. S. (2013). A cross-age study of an understanding of light and sight concepts in physics. Science Education International, 24(2), 129-149.
• Vosniadou, S. (1994). Introduction. Learning and Instruction, 4, 3-6.
• Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri, 4.baskı, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods, CA: Sage, Beverly Hills.
• Yurdakul, B. (2005). Eğitimde yeni yönelimler. Ö. Demirel (Ed.), Yapılandırmacılık. Pegem A Yayınevi, Ankara.