Marka Yayma Stratejilerinde Ürün Benzerliğinin Etkisi ve Üç Ayrı MArka Üzerinde Bir Uygulama

Marka yayma stratejisi, başarılı bir marka adının yeni ürün gruplarında veya ürün farklılaştırılmalarında aynen kullanılmasıdır Tüketicilerin marka yayma ile ilgili algılarında ve değerlendirmelerinde, asıl markanın algılanan kalitesi ve marka yaymaya dahil ürünlerin birbiriyle olan benzerliği önemli bir etkiye sahiptir. Bir marka yayma için benzerliğin önemi bulunmaktadır. Bunun sebebi ise, mevcut ve yayma ürünler arasındaki benzerlik büyük olduğunda, yeni ürüne olumlu ve olumsuz etkinin aktarılması da büyük olabilmektedir. Ayrıca, asıl marka ve yayma arasındaki algılanan benzerlik büyük olursa, yayma da olumlu değerlendirilebilmektedir. Araştırmanın amacı, marka yayma stratejilerinde ürün benzerliğinin tüketici değerlendirmesindeki etkisinin araştırılmasıdır. İstatistiki testlerde üç farklı marka kullanılmıştır. Bu sonuçlara göre, asıl marka hakkındaki olumlu görüş ile yayma ürünlerin benzerlik değerlendirmeleri arasında ve yayma ürünler arasındaki benzerlik düzeyiyle, yayma değerlendirmeleri arasında bir ilişki bulunmuştur.

The Effects of Product Similarities on Brand Extension Strategies and a Practice on Three Different Brands

: Brand extension strategy is an effort to extend a succesfidl brand name to launch new or modified products or lines-Brand extension attitudes are influenced by the percieved quality of the core brand and the fit between the extended products. The similarity is important for brand extension because the greater perceived similarity between the current and new product leads to a greater transfer of positive or negative effect to the new product. Furthermore, higher levels of perceived fit between core brand and extension will lead to more favorable evaluations of the extension. The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of brand extension strategies on consumers' attitudes regarding the product similarity. Three different brands are used for the statistical analysis. According to the results, there is a relationship between the favorable opinion about core brand and the evaluation of similarity for extended products. Furthermore, there is a relationship between the similarity of extended products and extension evaluations.

PDF

___

AAKER,D.A (1991) Managing Brand Equity : Capitalizing on the value of a Brand Name. New York, Maxwell Macmillan International.
AAKER, D.A. & KELLER, K.L. (1990) Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing 54, (1 : January), 27-41.
AMBLER, T. & STYLES, C. (1996) Brand development versus new product development : towards a process model of extension decisions. Marketing Intelligence &Planning 14, (7), 10-19.
BIEL, A. (1994) The Logic of product-line extensions. Harvard Business Review 72, (6 : November/December), 53-62.
BRONIARCZYK, S.M. & ALBA, J.W. (1994) The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketig Research 31, (4 : May), 214-228.
CRAVENS, D.W. (1991) Strategic marketing. Third Edition. USA, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
DACIN, P.A. & SMITH, D.C. (1994) The effect of brand portfolio characteristics on consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing Research. 31, (4: May), 229-242.
DEL VECCHIO, D. (2000) Moving beyond fit : the role of brand portfolio characteristics in consumer evaluations of brand reliability. The Journal of Product & Brand Management. 9, (7), 457-471.
DAWAR, N & ANDERSON, P.F. (1994) The effects of order and direction on multiple brand extensions. Journal of Business Research 30, (2 : June), 119-129.
EMR-NAMNEWS LTD. (1997), UK. Available from: _____http://www.kamcity.com/kamwords/worddesc.asp?WordID=541> [Accessed Arahk 01,2001].
JOHN, D & LOKEN, B & JOINER, C. (1998) The negative impact of extensions : can flagship products be diluted?. Journal ofMarketig 62, (1 : January), 19-32.
KAPFERER, J.N. (1992) Strategic brand management : new approaches to creating and evaluating brand equity. USA, The Free Press.
KELLER, K.L. (1998) Strategic brand management : buildig, measuring and managing brand equity. USA, Prentice- Hall, Inc.
KELLER, K.L. & AAKER, D. A. (1992) The effects of sequential introduction of brand extensions. Journal ofMarketig Research 29, (1 : February), 35-50.
KLINK, R.R. & SMITH, D.C. (2001) Threats to the external validity of brand extensions research. Journal ofMarketig Research 38.(3 : August), 326-335.
REDDY, S.K. & HOLAK, S.L. & BHAT, S. (1994) To extend or not to extend : success determinants of line extensions. Journal of Marketing Research 31, (4 : May), 243-262.
SCHEININ, D.A. & SCHMITT, H. (1994) Extending brands with new product concepts : the role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth. Journal of Business Research 31, (1 : September), 1-10.
SMITH, D.C. & PARK, W. (1992). The effects of brand extensions on marketing share and advertising efficiency. Journal ofMarketig Research 24, (1 : August), 296-313.