Zorunluluk Kipliği Belirtisi -mAll'nın Anlamsal İçyapısı
This article makes a semantic analysis of the only Turkish grammatical marker for necessity, -mAU, and aims at explaining how it is possible for this suffix to be used in expression of obligation, necessity and expression of deduction when used with the verb and copular ol~. We base our analyses on Frawley's (1992) definition of conceptual structure of modality. We also use Papafragou's (2000) definition of 'modal domains' to make the distinction between necessity and obligation clear. In addition to that, we define the conceptual structure of ambiguity of olmalı. We claim that this ambiguity can be resolved in terms of characteristics of possible entailments and presuppositions.
___
1. Aygen, G. (1998). Split-Infl Hypothesis in Turkish, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.2. Bybee, J. R. Perkins ve Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Bybee, Joan and Felschmann, S. (Eds.) (1995). Modality in Grammar and Discourse.Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
4. Corcu, D. (2003). Türkçe kiplik sisteminin bir parçası olarak gerekliliğin dilbilimsel incelemesi. Mersin Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
5. Heine, B. (1995). Agent-oriented vs. epistemic modality: Some observations on German modals. J. Bybee ve S. Fleishman (haz.), Modality in Grammar and Discourse içinde, 17-53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Frawley, W. (1992). Linguistics Semantics. London: Lawrence Erblaum Ass. Pub.
7. Kocaman, A. (1983). Türkçe'de kip olgusu üzerine gözlemler, Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı:Belleten, 1980-1981. Ankara: TDK.
8.Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics, II. Cilt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University
10.Press. Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and modality (İkinci Basım). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.Papafragou, A. (2000). Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam:Elsevier.
12.Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.Türkçe Sözlük. Ankara: TDK
14.Uzun, E. (2004). Dilbilgisinin Temel Kavramları. Istanbul: Pandora.
15.Uzun, L. ve Erk-Emeksiz, Z. (2004). Uluslarası Dilbilim Kurultayında sunulan bildiri. 13 Ağustos 2004. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir.
- ISSN: 1300-8552
- Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
- Başlangıç: 1990
- Yayıncı: Dilbilim Derneği