___

• Altan, A. (2006). Acquisition of word order in Turkish. In Y. Çotuksöken and N. Yalçın (Eds.), Proceedings of 20th national conference on Turkish linguistics, (pp. 51-61). İstanbul: Maltepe University.
• Comrie, B. (Ed.). (2009). The world's major languages. Routledge.
• De Cat, C. (2009). Experimental evidence for preschoolers’ mastery of “topic”. Language Acquisition, 16(4), 224-239.
• Dixon, L. Q. (2011). The role of home and school factors in predicting English vocabulary among bilingual kindergarten children in Singapore. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(1), 141-168.
• Dmitrievna Kallestinova, E. (2007). Aspects of word order in Russian. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Iowa.
• Dyakonova, M. (2004). Information structure development: Evidence from the acquisition of word order in Russian and English. Nordlyd, 32(1), 88-109.
• Ekmekçi, Ö. (1986). Significance of word order in the acquisition of Turkish. In D. Slobin and K. Zimmer (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics, (pp. 265-272). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Erguvanlı, E. (1984). The function of word order in Turkish grammar. California: University of California Press.
• Göksel, A. and Özsoy, A. S. (2000). Is there a focus position in Turkish?, In A. Göksel and C. Kerslake (Eds.), Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages; Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Turkish linguistics, (pp. 219-228). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
• Grinstead, I. (2004). Subjects and interface delay in child Spanish and Catalan. Language, 80(1), 40-72.
• Hawkins, J. (1990) German. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The worlds major languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Hickmann, M. (2003). Children’s discourse: person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. London: Routledge.
• Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? New York: Dial Press.
• Narasimhan, B. and Dimroth, C. (2008). Word order and information status in child language. Cognition, 107(1), 317-329.
• Place, S. and Hoff, E. (2016). Effects and noneffects of input in bilingual environments on dual language skills in 2 ½-year-olds. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(5), 1023-1041.
• Paradis, J. and Navarro, S. (2003). Subject realization and crosslinguistic interference in the bilingual acquisition of Spanish and English: What is the role of the input? Journal of Child Language, 30(2), 371-393.
• Platzack, C. (1996). The Initial Hypothesis of Syntax: A minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: Empirical findings, theoretical considerations and cross linguistic comparison (pp. 161-200). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Poeppel, D and Wexler, K. (1993). The full competence hypothesis of clause structures in early German. Language, 69, 1-33.
• Polinsky, M. and Scontras, G. (2020). Understanding heritage languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 4-20
• Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and acquisition of English syntax: the nature of early child grammars in English. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Rozendaal, M. (2007). The acquisition of the morphosyntax-pragmatics interface in French L1: Evidence from reference with articles and pronouns. In S. Baauw, J. Kampen & M. Pinto (Eds.), The acquisition of Romance languages: Selected papers from the Romance turn II (pp. 145-164). Utrecht: Nethetlands Graduate School of Linguistics/Landeljike (LOT).
• Rothman, J. (2009). Understanding the nature of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 155-163.
• Sağın-Şimşek, Ç. (2016). Acquisition of canonical and non-canonical word orders in L1 Turkish. In B. Haznedar and N. Ketrez (Eds.), The Acquisition of Turkish in Chilhood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Company.
• Schaeffer, J. (2000). The acquisition of direct object scrambling and clitic placement: syntax and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
• Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K. (2005). Erstellen und analysieren von gesprächskorpora mit exmaralda. Gesprächsforschung, 6, 171-195.
• Serratrice, L. (2005). The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics. 3, 437-462.
• Slobin, D. I. (1982). Universal and particular in the acquisition of language. In E. Wanner and L.R. Gletiman (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, (pp. 128-172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Slobin, D. I. and Bever, T. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A cross linguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12(3), 229-265.
• Slobin, D and Talay, A. (1986). Development of pragmatic uses of pronouns in Turkish child language. In A.A. Aksu-Koç and E. Erguvanlı Taylan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Turkish linguistics conference: August 9-10, (pp. 207-228). İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.
• Sorace, A. (2005). Selective optionality in language development. In L. Cornips and K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation, (pp. 55–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1-33.
• Weissenborn, J. (1990). Functional categories and verb movement: The acquisition of German syntax reconsidered. In Spracherwerb und grammatik (pp. 190-224). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden.