On the order of multiple topics and discourse-feature inheritance

Summary: This paper explores two possible syntactic confi gurations of multiple topics attested across languages, namely the strict vs. free arrangement of fronted topics in the left periphery. I suggest that these rigid/fl exible devices can be explained by implementing Chomsky’s (2008) C-to-T feature inheritance mechanism so as to include both agreement features and discourse features (Miyagawa, 2005; 2010), in combination with Richards’ (1999) multiple-specifi er approach to multiple movement, though subject to modifi cations. In my system, the possibility of free ordering of multiple topics is ultimately the consequence of lowering discourse features from C to T and specifying T as a multiple-attractor in the relevant language. This is the case of languages such as Spanish, as opposed to English. The specifi c type of topic feature which percolates to T in languages such as Spanish may attract familiar topics (Frascarelli & Hinterhölzl, 2007) to spec-TP.

___

Alexiadou, A. & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: word-order, V-movement and EPP checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16, 491–539.

Alexopoulou, T., Doron, E., & Heycock, C. (2004). Broad subjects and clitic left dislocation. In D. Adger, C. de Cat & G. Tsoulas (Eds.) Peripheries: syntactic edges and their effects (pp. 329–358). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Barbosa, P. (2001). On inversion in wh-questions in Romance. In A. Hulk & J.-Y. Pollock (Eds.) Romance inversion (pp. 2–59). New York: Oxford University Press.

Barbosa, P. (2009a). Parametric variation and the fl exible structure of the left periphery. Ms., Universidade do Minho.

Barbosa, P. (2009b). Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica 63 (1), 2–58.

Belletti, A. (1990). Generalized verb movement. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.

Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (ed.) The structure of CP and IP: the cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 2 (pp. 16–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Belletti, A. (2005). Extending doubling and the VP periphery. Probus 17, 1–35.

Benincà, P. & Poletto C. (2004). Topic, focus, and V2. Defi ning the CP sublayers. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 2 (pp. 52–75). New York: Oxford University Press.

Bianchi, V. & Frascarelli M. (2010). Is topic a root phenomenon?. IBERIA: an International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2 (1), 43–88.

Bobaljik, J. & Jonas D. (1996). Subject positions and the roles of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27, 195–236.

Bošković, Ž. (1999). On multiple feature checking: Multiple wh-fronting and multiple headmovement. In S. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds), Working minimalism (pp. 159–187). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Cecchetto, C. (2000). Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 12, 93–126.

Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: the Framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (Eds), Step by step: Essays in minimalist syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (89–155). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.) Ken Hale: a life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.) Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntaxsemantics (pp. 1–30). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. Otero & M.L. Zubizarreta (Eds.) Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cinque, G. (1990). Types of A-bar dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cinque, G. & Rizzi, L. (2008). The cartography of syntactic structures. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of grammatical analysis (pp. 51–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Demonte, V. & Fernández-Soriano, O. (2009). Force and fi niteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus 21 (1), 23–49.

Diesing, M. (1990). Verb movement and the subject position in Yiddish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 41–79.

Emonds, J. (2004). Unspecifi ed categories as the key to root constructions. In D. Adger, C. De Cat & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Peripheries: syntactic edges and their effects (pp. 75–121). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Frascarelli, M. & Hinterhölzl, R. (2007). Types of topics in German and Italian. In K. Schwabe & S. Winkler (Eds.) On information structure, meaning and form (pp. 87–116). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Frey, W. (2005). Pragmatic properties of certain German and English left peripheral constructions. Linguistics 43 (1), 89–129.

Grohmann, K.K. (2003). Prolifi c domains: on the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Grewendorff, G. & Sabel, J. (1999) Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction versus multiple specifi ers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17, 1–65.

Gutiérrez-Bravo, R. (2007). Prominence scales and unmarked word order in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25, 235–271.

Haegeman, L. (2000). Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP. In P. Rowlett (ed.) Papers from the Salford negation conference. [Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 98 (1), pp. 121–160].

Haegeman, L. (2006). Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger & P.H. Portner (Eds.) Cross-linguistic research in syntax and semantics: negation, tense and clausal architecture (pp. 27–52). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Haegeman, L. (2007). Operator movement and topicalisation in adverbial clauses. Folia Linguistica 41, 279–325.

Haegeman, L. (2010a). The movement derivation of conditional clauses. http://ling.auf.net/ lingBuzz/000882 (11 February 2010, to appear in Linguistic Inquiry).

Haegeman, L. (2010b). The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120, 628–648.

Hernanz, M.L. (2007). From polarity to modality: Some (a)symmetries between bien and sí in Spanish. In L. Eguren & O. Fernández-Soriano (Eds.) Coreference, modality, and focus (pp. 133–170). Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins.

Heycock, C. (2006). Embedded root phenomena. In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.) The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 2 (pp. 174–209). Oxford: Blackwell.

Horrocks, G. (1994). Subjects and confi gurationality: Modern Greek clause structure. Journal of Linguistics 30, 81–109.

İşsever, S. (2003). Information structure in Turkish: the word order-prosody interface. Lingua 113, 1025–1053.

İşsever, S. (2008). EPP-driven scrambling and Turkish. In T. Kurebito (ed.) Ambiguity of morphological and syntactic analyses (pp. 27–41). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.

Jiménez Fernández, Á. (2008). A discourse/agreement-based approach to peripheries. Paper presented at the Mediterranean Syntax Meeting 2, 16-18 October 2008, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.

Jiménez Fernández, Á. (2009) “On the order of multiple topics and discourse-feature inheritance.” Paper presented at the LAGB Meeting, University of Edinburgh.

Jiménez Fernández, Á. (2010). Discourse-agreement features, phasal C and the edge: a minimalist approach, Diacrítica – Language Sciences Series 24 (1), 23–46.

Jiménez Fernández, Á. (in press). Phasal heads, discourse/agreement features, and word order. In A.S. Özsoy & A. Gürel (Eds.) Issues in Mediterranean syntax. Leiden: Brill.

Jiménez Fernández, Á. & S. İşsever (2010, October) Multiple topic fronting, multiple specifi ers and feature inheritance. Paper presented at the Mediterranean Syntax Meeting 3, 8-10 October 2010, University of Athens.

Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kiss, K.É. (1995). Discourse confi gurational languages. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Kiss, K.É. (2008). Free word order, (non)confi gurationality, and phases. Linguistic Inquiry 39 (3), 441–475.

Kornfilt, J. (2005). Asymmetries between pre-verbal and post-verbal scrambling in Turkish. In J. Sabel & M. Saito (Eds.) The free word order phenomenon: its syntactic sources and diversity (pp. 163–179). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kural, M. (1997). Postverbal constituents in Turkish and the Linear Correspondence Axiom. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 498–519.

Lahne, A. (2008). Deriving MLE effects and anti-MLC effects from a specifi ty principle on derivations. Workshop on Ways of structure-building, University of the Basque Country.

Lambova, M. (2001). On A-bar movements in Bulgarian and their interaction. The Linguistic Review 18, 327–374.

Li, C.N. & Thompson, S.A. (1976). Subject and topic: a new typology of language. In C.N. Li (ed.) Subject and topic: a new typology of language (pp. 457–589). New York: Academic Press.

Maki, H., Kaiser, L. & Ochi, M. (1999). Embedded topicalization in English and Japanese. Lingua 107, 1–14.

Miyagawa, S. (2005). On the EPP. In N. Richards & M. McGinnis (Eds.) Perspectives on phases (pp. 201–236). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Miyagawa, S. (2010). Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourseconfi gurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Motapanyane, V. (1998). Focus, checking theory and fronting strategies in Romanian. Studia Linguistica 52 (3), 227–243.

Pesetsky, D. (1982). Paths and categories. (Ph.D dissertation, MIT, 1982).

Richards, N.W. (1999). Cyclicity and the ordering of multiple specifi ers. In S. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds.) Working Minimalism (pp. 127–158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fi ne structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Rizzi, L. (2004). Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond: the cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3 (pp. 223–251). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Roussou, A. & Tsimpli, I.-M. (2006). On Greek VSO again. Journal of Linguistics 42, 317–354.

Rudin, C. (1988). On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 445–501.

Saito, M. & N. Fukui. (1998). Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29,

Sigurðsson, H.Á. (2005). Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. In P. Pica (ed.) Linguistic variation yearbook 2004 (pp. 235–259). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Sigurðsson, H.Á. (2009). Language quarks. IBERIA: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 1, 169–183.

http://www.siff.us.es/iberia/index.php/ij/article/view/6/17

Sportiche, D. (1995). Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.) Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Spyropoulos, V. & Revithiadou, A. (2009). Subject chains in Greek and PF processing. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 57, 293-309.

Temürcü, C. (2005). The interaction of syntax and discourse in word order: data from Turkish. In G. König, I. Özyıldırım, D. Aydın & A. Altan (Eds.) Dilbilim ve uygulamaları (pp. 123–159). İstanbul: Multilingual.

Torrego, E. (1992). Case and argument structure. Ms., University of Massachussetts.

Ura, H. (1996). Multiple feature-checking: a theory of grammatical function splitting. (Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, 1996).

Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement inWestern Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 79–123.

Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (1991). On the structural positions of the subject in Spanish, their nature and their consequences for quantifi cation. In J. Lakarra & J. Ortiz de Urbina (Eds.) Syntactic theory and Basque syntax (pp. 447–493). San Sebastián: ASJU.

Vallduví, E. (1992). The informational component. (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1992).

Zagona, K. (2002). The syntax of Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zubizarreta, M.L. (1998). Word order, prosody and focus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.