Markedness, context, and directionality in Turkish harmony: A corpus study on vowel co-occurrence patterns

This paper reports results from a corpus study that examined static vowel cooccurrence patterns in Turkish. We show that roots are generally constrained by vowel harmony and that markedness alone, a notion that is at the heart of several previous analyses of Turkish vowel harmony, fails to account for vowel co-occurrence asymmetries and their probability. Furthermore, we identify significant interactions of both labial and palatal harmony with vowel height, the latter translating into a static subregularity with no apparent effect on the active vowel harmony process. In addition, we detect patterns that suggest non-local harmony effects, which does not find a straightforward explanation in most constraint-based accounts of harmony. Our data reveal that the structural description of vowel harmony constrains the shape of the non-initial vowels and that directionless harmony constraints do not accurately capture the autosegmental nature of the vowel harmony process in Turkish. Instead, we claim that harmony is parasitic on phonological representations, and must be viewed as a spreading process with a direction and context. We further argue that vowel harmony is active in (harmonic) roots and suggest an account of how such static regularities should be represented in the lexicon, and encoded as part of speakers phonological knowledge.

___

Archeangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (2002). Kinande vowel harmony. Domains, grounded conditions, and one-sided alignment. Phonology, 19, 139-188.

Archangeli, D. & Pulleyblank, D. (2007). Harmony. In Paul de Lacy (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology. (pp. 353-378). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.

Baković, E. (2000). Harmony, Dominance and Control. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University. Available as ROA-360 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.

Beckman, J. (1995). Shona height harmony: markedness and positional identity. In Jill

Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.) Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst: GLSA, 53-75.

Beckman, J. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization, and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology 14(1), 1-46.

Beckman, J. (1998). Positional faithfulness. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Available as ROA-234 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.

Boersma, P. (1999). Optimality-Theoretic learning in the Praat program. IFA Proceedings, 23, 17-35 (= Rutgers Optimality Archive 380).

Clements, G. N. & Sezer, E. (1982). Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.). The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part II. ,(pp. 213-255). Dordrecht: Foris.

Goldstein, L. (1991). Lip rounding as side contact. In Actes du XIIème congrès international des sciences phonétiques (Vol I/5: Sessions plenières et semiplenières). Aix-en-Provence: Université de Provence, vol. 1, 97-101.

Hakkani-Tür, D., Oflazer, K. & Tür, G. (2002). Statistical morphological disambiguation for agglutinative languages. Computers and the Humanities, 36, 381-410.

Hayes, B. & Londe Z. C. (2006). Stochastic phonological knowledge: The case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology, 23(1), 59-104.

Hayes, B. & Londe, Z. C. (2006). Stochastic Phonological Knowledge: The Case of Hungarian Vowel Harmony. Phonology. 23. 59-104.

Inkelas, S., Orgun C. O. & Zoll C. (1996). Exceptions and static phonological patterns: cophonologies vs. prespecification. Ms UCB & University of Iowa. Available as ROA-124-0496 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.

Kabak, B. (2004). Acquiring phonology is not acquiring vowel inventories but contrasts: the loss of Turkic and Korean primary long vowels. Linguistic Typology, 8 (3), 351 368.

Kabak, B. (2007). Hiatus resolution in Turkish: An underspecification account. Lingua, 117, 1378-1411.

Kabak, B., Maniwa, K. & Kazanina, N. (2010). Listeners use vowel harmony and wordfinal stress to spot nonsense words: A study of Turkish and French. Laboratory Phonology 1, 207-224.

Kabak, B. (2011). Turkish vowel harmony. In: Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume & Keren Rice (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to Phonology. (pp. 2831- 2854). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kaun, A. (1995). The typology of rounding harmony. An optimality theoretic approach. PhD dissertation, UCLA. Published as UCLA Dissertations in Linguistics, No. 8.

Kaun, A. (2004). The typology of rounding harmony. In Bruce Hayes (ed.) Phonetically Based Phonology. (pp. 87-115). West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Kiparsky, P. & Pajusalu K. (2003). Towards a typology of disharmony. The Linguistic Review, 20, 217-241.

Kirchner, R. (1993). Turkish Vowel Harmony and Disharmony: An Optimality Theoretic Account. Paper presented at the Rutgers Optimality Workshop (ROW-I), New Brunswick, NJ.

Krämer, M. (2003). Vowel harmony and correspondence theory. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

LaCross, A. (2008). Faithfulness and Positional Licensing: The Match Constraint in Khalkha Mongolian [ATR] Vowel Harmony. Paper presented at the 16th Manchester Phonology Meeting.

Lombardi, L. (1995). Restrictions on direction of voicing assimilation: An OT account. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 3, 89115.

Lombardi, L. (1999). Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, 267-302.

Mahanta, S. (2007). Directionality and locality in vowel harmony: With special reference to vowel harmony in Assamese. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University. LOT dissertation series 173.

McCarthy, J. J. & Prince A. (1993a). Prosodic Morphology I: constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Rutgers University.

McCarthy, J. J. & Prince A. (1993b). Generalized alignment. Yearbook of Morphology 1993, 79-153.

McCarthy, J. J. & Prince A. (1999). Faithfulness and identity in prosodic morphology. In René Kager, Harry van der Hulst & Wim Zonneveld (eds.) The Prosody- Morphology Interface. (pp. 218-309). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oflazer, K. (1994). Two-level description of Turkish morphology. Literary and Linguistic Computing 9(2), 137-148.

Polgárdi, K. (1999). Vowel harmony and disharmony in Turkish. The Linguistic Review ,16, 187-204.

Prince, A. & Smolensky P. (1993/2004). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford, UK: Blackwell (revision of 1993 technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science).

Stevens, K. N. (2000). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. TELL: http://socrates.berkeley.edu:7037/

Terbeek, D. (1977). A cross-language multidimensional scaling study of vowel perception. PhD dissertation, UCLA. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 37.

Van der Hulst, H. & van de Weijer, J. (1991). Topics in Turkish Phonology. In Hendrik E. Boeschoten & Ludo T. Verhoeven (eds.) Turkish Linguistics Today. (pp. 11-59). Leiden: E.J. Brill,

Walker, R. (1998). Nasalization, neutral segments, and opacity effects. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz. Available as ROA-405 from the Rutgers Optimality Archive.

Walker, R. (2012). Vowel harmony in Optimality Theory. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6/9, 575-592.

Yavaş, M. (1980). Some pilot experiments on Turkish vowel harmony. Papers in Linguistics, 13, 543-562.

Zuraw, K. (2000). Patterned exceptions in phonology. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.