___

Aksu-Koç, A. ve Slobin, D. (1985). The acquisition of Turkish. D. Slobin (haz.) içinde, The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (s. 839-378). Hillsdate: Laurance Earlbaum Associates.

Amaro, J.C. ve Rothman, J. (2010). What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 Initial State. Second Language Research, 26, 189-218.

Bailyn, J. F. (2001). On scrambling: A reply to Boskovic and Takahashi. Linguistic Inquiry,32, 635-658.

Bardel, C. ve Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third languageacquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research,23, 459-484.

Batman-Ratyosyan, N. ve Stromswold, K. (1999). What Turkish acquisition tells us about underlying word order and scrambling. University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics, 6(1), 37-52.

Batman-Ratyosyan, N. ve Stromswold, K. (2002). Morphosyntax is easy, discourse/pragmatics is hard. BUCLD, 26 (2), 793-804.

Bever, T. ve Slobin, D. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: acrosslinguistic study of word order and inflections.Cognition,12(3), 229-265.

Bohnacker, U. (2006). When Swedes begin to learn German: from V2 to V2. SecondLanguage Research,22, 443-486.

Boskovic, Z. ve Takahashi, D. (1998). Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry,29, 347-366.

Bouvy, C. (2000). Towards the construction of a theory of cross-linguistic transfer. J.

Cenoz ve U. Jessner (haz.) içinde, English in Europe: the acquisition of a thirdlanguage(s. 143-157). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Bozşahin, C. ve Özge, U. (2010). Intonation in the grammar of Turkish. Lingua,120, 132-175.

Chomsky, N. (1991). Linguistics and adjacent fields: a personal view. A. Kasher (haz.) içinde, The Chomskyan turn (3-25). Cambridge, Mass: Basil Blackwell.

Clahsen, H, Meisel, J.M. ve Pienemann, M. (1983). Deutsch als zweitsprache: Der sprachenerwerb auslandischer arbeiter. Tübingen: Gunter Narr . Clahsen, H. (1988). Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of verb placement and inflection by children and adults.S. Flynn, ve W.

O'Neil (haz.) içinde, Linguistic theory in second language acquisition (s. 47-75). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Di, D. (2005). The acquisition of Chinese as a third language by Japanese L1/English L2 speakers. Yüksek Lisans tezi, Edinburgh Üniversitesi, Erişim adresi:http://hdl.handle.net/1842/2074.pdf .

Doi, T. ve Yoshioka, K. (1987). Which grammatical structure should be taught when? Implications of the Pienemann-Johnston model to teaching Japanese as a foreign/second language. Proceedings of the ninth Hawaii association of teachers of Japanese(HATJ) conference on Japanese language and language teaching, (s. 10- 22).

Ekmekçi, Ö.(1986). The developmental errors in the pre-school Turkish children"s speech.A. Aksu- Koç ve E. Erguvanlı-Taylan (haz.) içinde, Türk dilbilimi konferansı bildirileri,9-10 Ağustos 1984(s. 249-268). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.

Flynn, S., Vinnitskaya, I. ve Foley, C. (2004). The cumulative enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults and children"s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism,1, 3-16.

Fukui, N. (1993). Parameters and optionality. Linguistic Inquiry,24, 399-420. Grewendorf, G. ve Sabel J. (1999). Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction versus multiple specifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, 1-65.

Hale, K. (1983). Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language andLinguistic Theory,1, 5-47.

Hara, M. (2009). Evidence for L2 syntactic gap-processing in Japanese scrambling sentences. C. Jean ve diğ. (haz.) içinde, Proceedings of the 3rd conference on generative approaches to language acquisition North America (GALANA 2008) (s. 54-63). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings, Project.

Hopp, H. (2004). Syntactic and interface knowledge in advanced and near-native interlanguage grammars. A. Sorace, S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood-Smith ve M.

Ota (haz.) içinde, EUROSLA Yearbook (s. 67-94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hopp, H. (2005). Constraining second language word order optionality: Scrambling in advanced English-German and Japanese-German interlanguage. Second Language Research,21, 34-72.

Iwasaki, N. (2003). L2 acquisition of Japanese knowledge and use of case particles in SOV and OSV sentences. S. Karimi (haz.) içinde, Word order and scrambling (s. 273-300). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

İşsever, S. (2006). Türkçede takısız nesne adöbekleri ve çalkalama. Dil Dergisi, 131, 42- 56.

İşsever, S. (2008). EPP-driven scrambling and Turkish. T. Kurebito (haz.) içinde, Ambiguity of morphological and syntactic analyses (s. 27-41). Tokyo: Tokyo University of Foreign Studies (Research Institute for Languages of Asia and Africa [ILCAA]) Press.

Karimi, S. (1999). Is scrambling as strange as we think it is? B. Bruening,,C. Krause, K.

Arregi ve V. Lin (haz.) içinde, MIT working papers in linguistics (s. 159-190). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

Karimi, S. (2003). Word order and scrambling. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Kiss, K. (1994). Scrambling as the base-generation of random complement order. H.

Riemsdijk ve N. Corver (haz.) içinde, Studies on scrambling: Movement and nonmovement approaches to free word-order phenomena (s. 221-256). Berlin: Mouton. Koda, K. (1993). Transferred L1 strategies and L2 syntactic structure in L2 sentence comprehension. The Modern Language Journal,77, 490-500.

Kornfilt, J. (2005). Asymmetries between pre-verbal and post-verbal scrambling in Turkish. J. Sabel ve M. Saito (haz.) içinde, The free word order phenomenon: Its syntactic sources and diversity (s. 163-180). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kural, M. (1997). Postverbal constituents in Turkish and the linear correspondence axiom. Linguistic Inquiry,28(3), 498-519.

Leung, Y. I. (2006). Full transfer vs. partial transfer in L2 and L3 acquisition. P. Prévost, R. Slabakova ve S. Montrul (haz.) içinde, Inquiries in linguistic development (s. 157-188). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

MacWhinney, B. ve Mitsugi, S. (2010). The use of case-marking information during second language processing: Evidence from ditransitive scrambling in Japanese.

B.V. Patten ve J. Jegerski (haz.) içinde, Second language processing and parsing: theory and research (s. 159-175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

MacWhinney, B., Mitsugi, S. ve Shirai, Y. (2010). Cue-based processing of relative clauses in second language Japanese. M. Prior ve Y. Watanabe (haz.) içinde, Selected proceedings of the second language research forum 2008 (s. 121-138). Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Proceeding Project.

Marsden, H. (2008), Pair-list readings in Korean-Japanese,Chinese-Japanese andEnglish-Japanese interlanguage. Second Language Research,24(2), 189-226.

Miyagawa, S. (1997).Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry,28, 1-26.

Miyagawa, S. (2003). A-movement scrambling and options without optionality. S.

Karimi (haz.) içinde, Word order and scrambling (s. 177-200). Oxford: Blackwell. Miyagawa, S. (2006). On the "undoing" property of scrambling: A response to Boskovic. Linguistic Inquiry,37, 607-624.

Miyara, S. (1982). Reordering in Japanese. Linguistic Analysis,9, 307-340.

Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Yayımlanmış Doktora tezi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Erişim adresi: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15166.

Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Doktora tezi. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Saito, M. (1989). Scrambling as semantically vacuous A"-movement. A. Kroch ve M. Baltin (haz.) içinde, Alternative conceptions of phrase structure (s. 182-200).

Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Schaeffer, J. (2000). The acquisition of direct object scrambling and clitic placement: syntax and pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Schields, R. (2011). Adjuncts can scramble, and scrambling obeys relativized minimality. Taslak, UW-Madison. Erişim adresi: http://mywebspace.wisc.edu/rashields/web/papers.htm.

Schwartz, B. D. (2003). Child L2 acquisition: paving the way. A. Brown, B. Beachley ve F. Conlin (haz.) içinde, BUCLD 27: Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University conference on language development (s. 26-50). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.

Unsworth, S. (2005). Child L2, adult L2, child L1: Differences and similarities. A study on the acquisition of direct object scrambling in Dutch. Doktora tezi, Utrecht Üniversitesi.

Yoshioka, K. (1991). The acquisition of Japanese particles: an effort to test the Pienemann-Ohnston model with three measurements. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans tezi, Havai Üniversitesi, Manoa.