FİLATELİK MATERYALİN NİTELENMESİ

Kitapdışı materyallerin bir parçası olan filatelik materyaller, bir bilgi kaynağı olarak üstüne akademik çalışmalar yapılan kütüphane/bilgi merkezi dermelerinin bir malzemesidir. Bu özellikleri nedeniyle, geleneksel bilgi kaynakları gibi tercih edilen bir kütüphane otomasyon programı ile hizmete sunulmalı; standart kurallara göre nitelenerek, erişime açılmalıdır. Birçok ülkede derleme kanunu kapsamında o ülkenin milli kütüphanesi başta olmak üzere farklı türdeki kütüphanelere gönderilen filatelik materyalin organizasyonu ve erişime açılması için kullanılması gereken öncelikli kural ve standartlar Anglo-Amerikan Kataloglama Kuralları II (AACR-II/AAKK-II) ve MARC olmalıdır. Bu çalışmada filatelik materyal olarak adlandırılan pullar, ilkgün zarfları (First Day Cover - FDC), özel tarih damgalı zarflar ve özel gün zarflarının (Special Day Cover - SDC) hangi MARC alanları dikkate alınarak nitelenmesi gerektiği örneklerle anlatılmaya çalışılmış ve öneriler geliştirilmiştir. Kütüphanelerde daha yoğunlukla görülen pul ve zarflara göre nitelenmesinde belirli bir aşamaya gelinmiş olan kartpostallar çalışma dışında bırakılmıştır.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PHILATELIC MATERIALS

Although philatelic materials, a part of non-book materials, have been widely used as pieces of collections, and academic studies usually concentrates on this characteristic, they are also information sources. For this reason, like traditional information sources, books, serials they should be catalogued according to standard rules with a library automation program and should be opened to access. In many countries, the standard cataloguing rules needed to be used for organizing and opening to access of philatelic materials, which are sent to the national library and the other kinds of libraries in the scope of legal deposit, should be Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules-II and MARC. In this study, which MARC fields among FDCs (First Day Cover) and SDC (Special Day Cover) should be taken into consideration in cataloguing of stamps will be explained through examples and proposals will be made. Postcards, which are catalogued according to stamps and FDC/SDCs on a level, are excepted from this study.

PDF

___

Anameriç, Hakan. “Stamps as an Information Source in the National Library of Turkey.” Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services 30. 1-2 (2006): 117-127.
Anameriç, Hakan ve Fatih Rukancı. Posta Pullarında Başkent Ankara: Seçmeler (1922-2008). Ankara: VEKAM, 2011.
Arslan, Metin. Araştırma Yöntem ve Teknikleri Ders Notları. Şanlıurfa: Harran Üniversitesi Birecik Meslek Yüksekokulu, 2012.
Baadke, Michael. “Se-tenant Stamps: Different Designs Together.” Web 15 Kasım 2017.
Basar, Ivan. “Library and Archives Canada Preservation Centre”. The Serials Librarian 49. 1-2 (2005): 183-203.
Bertolini, Maria Violeta. “The New ISBD Area 0 and the Teaching of Cataloguing Non-Book Materials.” Italian Journal of Library and Informatipn Science 3.1 (2012): 1-49.
Cassidy, Jillian. “Eileen Mayo: Her Prints, Posters and Postage Stamps.” Woman’s Art Journal 24.1 (2003): 17-22.
Child, Jack. “The Politics and Semiotics of the Smallest Icons of Popular Culture: Latin American Postage Stamps.” Latin American Research Review 40.1 (2005): 108-137.
Çoğaltılmış Fikir ve Sanat Eserlerini Derleme Kanunu. T.C. Resmi Gazete (28219, 22.02.2012).
International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD). Recommended by IFLA ISBD Review Goup, Approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA cataloguing Section. Consolidated Edition. [s.n.]: [s.l.], 2010.
ISBD (NBM): International Standart Bibliographic Description for Non-Book Materials. Revised Edition. London: FLA Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC Programme British Library Bibliographic Services, 1987.
Jones, Robert A. “Heroes of the Nation? The Celebration of the Scientists on the Postage Stamp of Great Britain, France and West Germany.”Journal of Contemporary History 36. 3 (2001): 403-22.
Karakaş, Sekine, Fatih Rukancı ve Hakan Anameriç. Pullarda İstanbul. Ankara: T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, 2011.
Kumar, Krishan V. Jeyaraj ve Ramesh C. Gaur. “India: Libraries, Archives and Museums.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. 3rd Edition. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2009. 2291-2329.
Neussel, Frank. “Five Ideas for the Spanish Classroom.” Hispania 90. 1 (2007): 131133.
Neussel, Frank ve Caterina Ciconga. “Postage Stamps as Pedagogical Instruments in the Italian Curriculum.” Italica 69. 2 Summer (1992): 210-227.
Osmond, Gary ve Murray G. Phillips. “Enveloping the Past: Sport Stamps, Visuality and Museums.” The International Journal of the History of Sport 28. 8-9 (2011): 1138-1155.
Philatelic Collections and Archives by Name and Subject. Web. 22 Haziran 2016.
Raento, Pauliina ve Stanley D. Brunn. “Visualizing Finland: Postage Stamps as Political Massengers.” Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography 87. 2 (2005): 145-163.
Reid, Donald M. “The Symbolism of Postage Stamps: A Source for the Historian.” Journal of Contemporary History 19 (1984): 223-249.
Reitz, Joan M. “Graphic.” ODLIS Online Dictionary for Library and Information Science Web. 7 Şubat 2018.
Smith-Yoshimura, Karen ve diğerleri. Implications of MARC Tag Usage on Library Metadata Practices. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. 2010.
Steel, Adrian ve Peter Sutton. “The Biggest, and … One of the Most Advanced, Enterprises in the Country: The Royal Mail Archive and the Contemporary Historian.” Contemporary British History 21.1 (2007): 111-131.
Stephen, Andy. “British Library.” In Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences 3rd Edition. New York: Taylor and Francis, 2009. 677-686.
Yıldırım, Ali ve Hasan Şimşek. Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Şeçkin Yayıncılık, 2016.