___

• Aijmer, K. (2002). English discourse particles. Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Aijmer, K. & Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. (2004). A model and a methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: The semantic field of expectation. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1781-1805.
• André, V. (2005). Oui-non: Une pratique discursive sous influence. Marges Linguistiques, 9, 195-213.
• Arndt, W. (1960). Modal particles in Russian and German. Word, 16, 323–336.
• Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
• Bazzanella, C. (1990). Phatic connective as interactional cues in contemporary spoken Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 629-647.
• Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Burridge, K. & Florey, M. (2002). ‘Yeah-no He’s a Good Kid’: A discourse analysis of Yeah-no in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 149-171. Büyükkantarcıoğlu, N. (2006). An analysis of Turkish interjections in the context of reactive idea framing. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23 (1), 19Crystal, D. (1988). Another look at well, you know … English Today 13, 47-49.
• Çubukçu, H. (2005). Karşılıklı konuşmada destekleyici geri bildirim. XVIII. Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri, (pp. 289-304). Ankara.
• Drummond, K. & Hopper, R. (1993). Some uses of yeah. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26, 203–212.
• Feng, G. (2006). A theory of conventional implicature and pragmatic markers in Chinese. Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Reading.
• Fischer, K. (2000). Discourse particles, turn-taking, and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 8, 111-137.
• Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6 (2), 167-90.
• Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 931-952.
• Fuller, J. M. (2003). The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 23-45.
• Gülich, E. (1970). Makrosyntax der Gliederungssignale im gesprochenen Französisch. München.
• Horn, L. (1985). Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language, 61, 121-17
• Jefferson, G., (1984). Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘mmhm’. Papers in Linguistics, 17, 197-216.
• Lee-Goldman, R. (2011). No as a discourse marker. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 2627-2649.
• Li, C. N. & S. A. Thompson. (1981). Mandarin Chinese. A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Müller, S. (2005). Discourse markers in native and non-Native English discourse. Amstordam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Norrick, N. R. (2012). Interjections. In G. Anderson & K. Aijmer (Eds.), Pragmatics of society. Handbooks of pragmatics, Vol. 5 (pp. 243-291). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
• Östman, J-O. (1995). Pragmatic particles twenty years after. In B. Wårvik et al. (Eds.), Proceedings from the Turku conference, Anglicana Turkuensia, 14, 95-10
• Özbek, N. (2000). Yani, işte, şey, ya: Interactional markers of Turkish. In: A. Göksel & Kerslake, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 393-401). Wiesbaden, Harrosowitz.
• Redeker, G. 199 Review article: Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29, 1139-1172.
• Risselada, R. & Spooren, W. (1998). Introduction: Discourse markers and coherence relations. Journal of Pragmatics, 30, 131-133.
• Ruhi, Ş. (2011, October). Sözlüksel ve edimbilimsel anlamı sözlü derlemden izlemek. Paper presented at Doğan Aksan Çalıştayı, 3 October 2011.
• Ruhi, Ş., Eryılmaz, K. & Acar, M. G. C. (2012, May). A platform for creating multimodal and multilingual spoken corpora for Turkic languages: Insights from the Spoken Turkish Corpus. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Language Resources and Technologies for Turkic Languages, LREC 2012, İstanbul, 57-63. Retrieved from http://www.lrec-conf.org/ proceedings/ lrec2012/workshops/02. Turkic%20Languages%20Proceedings.pdf
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation, Language, 50, 696-735.
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
• Schegloff, E. A. (2001). Getting serious: Joke! serious ‘no’. Journal of Pragmatics 33, 1945–1955.
• Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Schourop, L. 1999. Tutorial. Discourse markers. Lingua, 107, 227-265.
• Sperber, Dan & Deirdre, W. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Spoken Turkish Corpus http//stc.org.tr Travis, C. E. (2006). The natural semantic metalanguage approach to discourse particles. In K. Fischer (Ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, (pp. 219-241). Oxford: Elsevier.
• Wang, Y.F., TSai, P.h., Ling, M.y. (2007). From informational to emotive use: meiyou (‘no’) as a discourse marker in Taiwan Mandarin conversation. Discourse Studies, 9 (5), 677-701.
• Yadugiri, M.A. (1986). Some pragmatic implications of the use of yes and no in response to yes-no questions. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 199-210.
• Yılmaz, E. (2004). A pragmatic analysis of Turkish discourse Particles: Yani, işte and şey (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). METU, Ankara.
• Yu, A. J.-Y. (2004). Discourse functions of negative meiyou in Taiwan Mandarin. Unpublished MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei.