___

• Baker, C. D. (2004). Membership categorization and interview accounts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. (pp. 162–176). London: SAGE.
• Cameron, D. (1998). Gender, Language, Discourse: A review essay, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 23(4), 945-973.
• Edley, N. & Wetherell, M. (1997). Jockeying for position: The construction of masculine identities, Discourse & Society, 8(2), 203-217.
• Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (2012). Descriptions and Assessments. Plenary talk given Conference University. Loughborough
• Fishman, P. M. (1983). Interaction: The Work Women Do. In B. Thorne, C. Kramarae and N. Henley (Ed.), Language, Gender and Society. (pp. 89–101). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
• Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, J. Heritage (Ed.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry, Language in Society, 27, 291-334.
• Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. Fitch and R. Sanders (Ed.), Handbook of Language and Social Interaction. (pp. 103–147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Polity Press.
• Hester, S. & Eglin, P. (1997). Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Ethnomethodology and University Press of America. Boston, MA: International Institute for
• Jefferson, G. (2004). “At first I thought”: A normalizing device for extraordinary events. In G. H. Lerner, (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation. (pp. 131-67). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Kessler, S. J. & McKenna, W. (1978). Gender: an ethnomethodological approach. New York: Wiley.
• Kitzinger, C. (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis, Feminism and Psychology, 10, 163-93.
• Kitzinger, C. (2007). Feminist Conversation Analysis: Research by students at the University of York, UK, Feminism & Psychology, 17, 133-148.
• Lakoff, R. (1975). Extract from Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper.
• Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, J.Heritage (Ed.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. 2 vols. Edited by Gail Jefferson with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Reflections on talk and social structure. In D. Boden, D.H. Zimmerman (Ed.) Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. (pp. 44-70). Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A tutorial on membership categorization, Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 462-82.
• Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: SAGE.
• Silverman D. (2012). Beyond armed camps: A response to Stokoe, Discourse Studies, 14(3), 329-336.
• Speer, S. A. (2005). The interactional organization of the gender attribution process, Sociology, 39, 67-87.
• Speer, S. A. & Stokoe, E. (2011). Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Spender, D. (1980). Man Made Language. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
• Stokoe, E. (2000). Towards a conversation analytic approach to gender and discourse, Feminism and Psychology, 10, 552-63.
• Stokoe, E. (2003). Mothers, single women and sluts: gender, morality and membership categorisation in neighbour disputes, Feminism and Psychology, 13(3), 317-44.
• Stokoe, E. (2006). On ethnomethodology, feminism, and the analysis of categorial reference to gender in talk-in-interaction, Sociological Review, 54(3), 467-94.
• Stokoe, E, (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis, Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277-303.
• Stokoe, E. (2012). Categorial systematics, Discourse Studies, 14(3), 345-354.
• Stokoe, E. H. & Smithson, S. (2001). Making gender relevant: conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction, Discourse & Society, 12, 243-69.
• Streeck, J., Goodwin, C. & LeBaron, C. (Ed.) (2011). Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Series: Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives]
• Tannen, D. (1991). You Just Don‟t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago.
• Uchida, A, (1992). When “difference” is “dominance”: A critique of the “anti-power-based” cultural approach to sex differences, Language in Society, 21(4), 547-568.
• Weatheral, A. (2002). Towards understanding gender and talk-in-interaction, Discourse & Society, 13(6), 767-781.
• Wiggins, S. & Potter, J. (2003). Attitudes and evaluative practices: Category vs. item and subjective vs. objective constructions in everyday food assessments, British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 513–31.
• Whitehead, K. A. (2009). ‘Categorizing the categorizer’: The management of racial common sense in interaction, Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(4): 325–342.