It is very important to show the ocular fundus, which is useful in identifying some systemic and hereditary diseases in farm animals. However, herd-based ophthalmoscopic scanning in farm animals is quite difficult under field conditions. In this study, using a prototype D-EYE® system in the iPhone 5 model, it was aimed to record the ocular fundus images of the herd of Honamlı goat breed and to emphasize its practicality in the protection of herd health. No signs of disease were encountered in herd screening using smartphone ophthalmoscopy. In this study, the normal variations of the fundus, tapetum color, the reflectance of the tapetum, the shape of the tapetal area, the homogeneity of the tapetum, the location of the optic disc or retinal endothelium, the color, shape, border, and the relationship between the hair color and the pigmentation of the tapetal region were examined. It was revealed that herd-based ophthalmoscopic examination is difficult in field conditions to protect herd health, while herd-based scanning using smartphone ophthalmoscopy is quite practical and the video images taken are sufficient for clinical examination. With this study, normal ophthalmoscopic fundus views of Honamlı goats were presented and contributed to the literature.
Çiftlik hayvanlarında bazı sistemik ve kalıtsal hastalıkların tanımlanmasında yararlı olan oküler fundusu görüntülemek çok önemlidir. Bununla birlikte, çiftlik hayvanlarında sürü tabanlı oftalmoskopik tarama, saha koşulları altında oldukça zordur. Bu çalışmada, iPhone 5 modelinde bir prototip D-EYE® sistemi kullanılarak, Honamlı keçi sürüsünün oküler fundus görüntülerinin kaydedilmesi ve sürü sağlığının korunmasındaki pratikliğinin vurgulanması amaçlanmıştır. Akıllı telefon oftalmoskopi kullanılarak sürü taramasında herhangi bir hastalık belirtisine rastlanmamıştır. Çalışmada fundusun normal varyasyonları, tapetum rengi, tapetumun yansıması, tapetumun homojenliği, optik diskin veya retinal endotelin yeri, renk, şekil, sınır incelenmiştir ve kıl örtüsü rengi ile tapetal bölgenin pigmentasyonu arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Bu çalışma ile Honamlı keçilerinin normal oftalmoskopik fundus görüşleri sunulmuş ve literatüre katkıda bulunulmuştur.
___
1. Kalaka R, Ramani C. (2017). Normal Ocular Fundus Imaging of Domestic Goat (Capra hircus). Intas Polivet. 18(II):509-510.
2. Khanamiri HN, Nakatsuka A, El-Annan J. (2017). Smartphone Fundus Photography. J Vis Exp. 125: 55958. 1-5.
3. Gomes FE, Ledbetter E. (2019). Canine and Feline Fundus Photography and Videography Using a Nonpatented 3D Printed Lens Adapter for a Smartphone. Vet Ophthalmol. 22: 82- 92.
4. Haddock LJ, Qian MD. (2015). Smartphone Technology for Fundus Photography Greater Portability Could Mean Greater Versatility. Retin Phys. 12(6) : 51–58.
5. Ryan ME, Rajalakshmi R, Prathiba V, et al. (2015). Comparison Among Methods of Retinopathy Assessment (CAMRA) Study. Opthalmology. 122(10): 2038-2043.
6. Russo A, Morescalchi F, Costagliola C, Delcassi L, Semeraro F. (2015). Comparison of Smartphone Ophthalmoscopy with SlitLamp Biomicroscopy for Grading Diabetic Retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 159(2): 360-364.
7. Kanemaki N, Inaniwa M, Terakado K, et al. (2016). Fundus Photography with A Smartphone in Indirect Ophthalmoscopy in Dogs and Cats. Vet Ophthalmol. 20(3): 1–5.
8. Galan A, Martin-Suarez EM, Molleda JM. (2006). Ophthalmoscopic Characteristics in Sheep and Goats: Comparative Study. J Vet Med A. 53:205–208.
9. Pearce JW, Moore CP. (2013). Food Animal Ophthalmology, In: Veterinary Ophthalmology, Gelatt KN, Gilger BC, Kern TJ (Eds). 5th ed. pp. 1610-1674. Wiley Blackwell, New Jersey, USA.
10. Cullen CL, Webb AA. (2013). Ocular Manifestations of Systemic Disease In: Veterinary Ophthalmology. Gelatt KN, Gilger BC, Kern TJ (Eds). 5th ed. pp. 2071-2101. Wiley Blackwell, New Jersey, USA.
11. Alina D, Muste A, Beteg F, Briciu R. (2008). Morphological Aspect of Tapetum Lucidum at some Domestic Animals. Bulletin USAAMV, Vet Med. 65:166-170.
12. Naderi S, Rezaei HR, Pompanon F, et al. (2008). The Goat Domestication Process Inferred from Large-Scale Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of Wild and Domestic Individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:17659–17664.
13. Karadağ O, Soysal Mİ. (2018). Honamlı Keçilerinin Bazı Döl Verimi, Büyüme ve Morfolojik Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. JOTAF. 15(01):135-142.
14. Daşkıran İ, Koluman N, Konyalı A. (2012). Keçi Yetiştirme, Ankara.
15. Balland O, Russo A, Isard PF, et al. (2017). Assessment of a Smartphone-Based Camera for Fundus Imaging in Animals. Vet Ophthalmol. 20(1): 89-94.
16. Crispin S. (2005). Notes on Veterinary Ophthalmology. pp. 261- 263. Blackwell, UK.
17. Brooks DE. (1999). Equine Ophthalmology. In: Veterinary Ophthalmology. Gelatt KN (ed). 3rd ed. pp. 1053-1115. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, USA.
18. Chase J. (1982). The Evolution of Retinal Vascularization in Mammals. Am Acad Ophthal. 89:1518–1525