The results of transrectal prostate biopsy in patients with low levels of prostate specific antigen

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, prostat spesifik antijen (PSA) değerleri 4 ng/ml altında olan hastaların prostat biyopsi sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve yöntem: Kliniğimizde Ocak 2005-Aralık 2011 tarihleri arasında prostat kanseri şüphesi olan ve total PSA değeri 4 ng/ml\'nin altında olan 61 hastadan alınan prostat biyopsisinin sonuçları retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Yaşları 41 ile 74 arasında değişen ve PSA ortalaması 2.5 ng/ml olan 63 olguya Transrektal Ultrasonografi (TRUS) eşliğinde prostat biyopsisi yapıldı. On iki hastada (%19) prostat kanseri tespit edildi. Biyopsi sonucu prostat kanseri olan bu hastaların ortalama Gleason skoru 6.8 (5-7), tümor pozitif kor sayısı ise 3 idi. Sonuç: Prostat spesifik antijen değeri 4 ng/ml\'nin altında olan olgularda kanser oranımız %19 olup, önceki raporlarla uyumlu bulunmuştur.

The results of transrectal prostate biopsy in patients with low levels of prostate specific antigen

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of prostate biopsy of patients who had the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels below 4 ng/ml. Material and methods: The medical records of 63 patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy, between January 2005 and December 2011, due to suspicion of prostate cancer with the PSA levels under 4 ng/ml were retrospectively reviewed. Results: Transrectal Prostate biopsy was performed to 63 patients. Prostate cancer was detected in 12 (19%) patients. The mean value of PSA was 2.5 ng/ml. The Gleason score of Prostate cancer patients was 6,8 (5-7) and the number of positive cores were 3. Conclusions: The rate of prostate cancer was found as 19% in patients with levels of PSA under 4 ng/ml and this ratio is compatible with the results of previous reports.

___

  • Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol 2005; 16(3):481-88.
  • Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58(1):71-96.
  • Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treat- ment of clinically localised disease. European urology 2011; 59(1):61-71.
  • Cooner WH, Mosley BR, Rutherford CL, Jr., et al. Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultraso- nography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1990; 143(8):1146-52.
  • Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Detection of organ- confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-spe- cific antigen-based screening. JAMA 1993; 270(7):948-54.
  • Mettlin C, Lee F, Drago J, et al. The American Cancer Soci- ety National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. Cancer 1991; 67(11):2949-58.
  • Colberg JW, Smith DS, Catalona WJ. Prevalence and path- ological extent of prostate cancer in men with prostate specific antigen levels of 2.9 to 4.0 ng./ml. J Urol 1993; 149(3):507-09.
  • Lodding P, Aus G, Bergdahl S, et al. Characteristics of screening detected prostate cancer in men 50 to 66 years old with 3 to 4 ng./ml. Prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1998; 159(6):899-903.
  • Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, et al. Measurement of prostate-specific antigen in serum as a screening test for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 1991; 324(9):1156-61.
  • Schroder FH, van der Cruijsen-Koeter I, de Koning HJ, et al. Prostate cancer detection at low prostate specific anti- gen. J Urol 2000; 163(6):806-12.
  • Carter HB, Pearson JD. Prostate-specific antigen testing for early diagnosis of prostate cancer: formulation of guide- lines. Urology 1999; 54:780-6.
  • Catalona WJ, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, et al. Selection of optimal prostate specific antigen cutoffs for early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves. J Urol 1994; 152(11):2037-42.
  • Ross KS, Carter HB, Pearson JD, et al. Comparative ef- ficiency of prostate-specific antigen screening strategies for prostate cancer detection. JAMA 2000; 284(8):1399-405.
  • Morgan TO, Jacobsen SJ, McCarthy WF, et al. Age-specific reference ranges for prostate-specific antigen in black men. N Engl J Med 1996; 335(2):304-10.
  • Altunoluk B, Bahar MR, Eren M, et al. Evaluation of the role of digital rectal examination and prostate specific anti- gen in diagnosis of prostate cancer J Clin Exp Invest 2012; 3(1):66-70.
  • Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ornstein DK. Prostate cancer de- tection in men with serum PSA concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and benign prostate examination. Enhancement of specificity with free PSA measurements. JAMA 1997; 277:1452-55.
  • Gilbert SM, Cavallo CB, Kahane H, et al. Evidence suggest- ing PSA cutpoint of 2.5 ng/mL for prompting prostate biop- sy: review of 36,316 biopsies. Urology 2005; 65(3):549-53.
  • Thompson IM, Pauler DK, Goodman PJ, et al. Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific an- tigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter. N Engl J Med 2004; 350(10):2239-46.
  • Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, et al. Operating charac- teristics of prostate-specific antigen in men with an initial PSA level of 3.0 ng/ml or lower. JAMA 2005; 294(1):66- 70.
  • Leite KR, Srougi M, Dall’Oglio MF, et al. Histopathologi- cal findings in extended prostate biopsy with PSA < or = 4 ng/mL. Int Braz J Urol 2008; 34(3):283-90.
Dicle Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-2945
  • Yayın Aralığı: 4
  • Başlangıç: 1963
  • Yayıncı: Cahfer GÜLOĞLU
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Analysis of 36 patients underwent cochlear implantation surgery

Ediz YORGANCILAR, Müzeyyen YILDIRIM, Ramazan GÜN, Salih BAKIR, Vefa KINIŞ, Musa ÖZBAY, Faruk MERİÇ, İsmail TOPÇU

Bleedings caused by warfarin overdose

Aylin ACAR, Mustafa HASBAHÇECİ, Fatih BAŞAK, Tolga CANBAK, Müjgan ÇALIŞKAN, Orhan ALİMOĞLU

Fertil kadınlar ve implantasyon başarısızlığı olan infertil kadınlarda endometriumun ince yapı ve immünohistokimyasal değerlendirilmesi

LEYLA BAHAR, Semra KAHRAMAN, MURAT AKKUŞ, Tülin BAYKAL

Doğu Anadolu\'da yeni açılan bir üniversitenin öğrencilerinde kaygı düzeylerinin sağlık, sosyal ve demografik faktörler ile ilişkisi

Süleyman Erhan DEVECİ, Ayşe ÇALMAZ, Yasemin AÇIK

Anesthesia management for pregnant patient with Arnold-Chiari malformation type I: A case report

Ahmet KÜÇÜK, Hasan Hüsnü YÜCE, Harun AYDOĞAN, Mahmut Alp KARAHAN, Şaban YALÇIN, Mehmet VURAL

Ötiroid multinodüler guatrlı olguların sitoloji ve histopatoloji sonuçları: Ultrasonografi özellikleri ile karşılaştırılması

Ömer YAZGAN, Fahri Halit BEŞİR, YUSUF AYDIN, Sibel YAZGAN, Melih Engin ERHAN, Burhan YAZICI, Ramazan BÜYÜKKAYA, Ömer ONBAŞ

Konya il merkezinde sağlıkta dönüşüm öncesi ve sonrası gebe ve bebek izlemleri

YASEMİN DURDURAN, Said BODUR, Enver ÇAKIL, Emel FİLİZ

Cateheter ablation treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

İbrahim Halil TANBOĞA, Mustafa KURT, Turgay IŞIK, Ahmet KAYA, Enbiya AKSAKAL, Mehmet EKİNCİ, EFTAL MURAT BAKIRCI, Hasan KAYA, Serdar SEVİMLİ

Düşük prostat spesifik antijen değeri olan hastalara yapılan transrektal prostat biyopsi sonuçları

Mehmet Nuri BODAKÇI, Yaşar BOZKURT, Murat ATAR, Namık Kemal HATİPOĞLU, Necmettin PENBEGÜL, Haluk SÖYLEMEZ, Ahmet Ali SANCAKTUTAR, Kadir YILDIRIM, Hüseyin BÜYÜKBAYRAM

Frequency of Helicobacter pylori in patients underwent endoscopy

Ahmet UYANIKOĞLU, Muharrem COŞKUN, Doğan Nasır BİNİCİ, Şiir UÇAR, Yunus İlyas KİBAR, Ahmet TAY, Yasin ÖZTÜRK