Farelerde lornoksikam ile parasetamol’ün preemptif analjezik etkinliğinin karşılaştırılması

Preemptif analjezi, ağrılı uyarıdan önce bir analjezik rejiminin uygulanarak periferik ve santral nosisepsiyonun bloke edilmesi anlamına gelmektedir. Biz bu deneysel çalışmamızda fareler üzerinde parasetamol ile lornoksikamın preemptif analjezik özelliklerini karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve yöntem: Fareler üç gruba ayrıldı. Farelerin sağ ön ayağına formalin enjeksiyonundan önce birinci gruba intraperitoneal serum fizyolojik, ikinci gruba lornoksikam ve üçüncü gruba parasetamol enjekte edildi. İşlem sonrası 60 dk boyunca farelerin ağrı cevabı kaydedildi. Bulgular: İlk 10 dk’da lornoksikamın kontrol grubuna göre daha etkin olduğu görünürken, 11-60.dk ve 0-60. dk dikkate alındığında parasetamolün lornoksikamdan ve kontrol grubundan daha etkin bir analjezi sağladığı görülmüştür. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda akut fazda lornoksikamın parasetamole göre anlamlı fayda sağlamasına karşın tonik fazda ve toplam sürede parasetamol daha etkin bulunmuştur.

The comparison of efficacy of lornoxicam and paracetamol for preemptive analgesia in mice

Preemptive analgesia means that block the peripheral and central nociception as an analgesic regime apply before the painful stimulus. We aimed compared preemptive analgesic properties of lornoxicam with paracetamol on mice in this experimental study. Materials and methods: Experimental mice were divided into three groups. Before the formalin injection in the right front foot of mice, saline administered in first group, lornoxicam administered in second group and paracetamol in third group intraperitoneally. Responses to pain of mice were recorded after the procedure during the 60 min. Results: While appears to be lornoxicam more effective than the control group in the first 10 minutes, paracetamol provided more effective analgesia lornoxicam and control group within 11-60th min. and 0-60th min. Conclusion: Although lornoxicam provided significant benefit in acute phase, paracetamol was found more effective in tonic phase and total time in this study.

___

  • 1. Dahl JB, Kehlet H. The value of pre-emptive analgesia in the treatment of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 1993;70(4):434-9.
  • 2. Wall PD. The prevention of postoperative pain. Pain 1988;33(3):289-90.
  • 3. Rosenow DE, Albrechtsen M, Stolke D. A comparison of patient controlled analgesia with lornoxicarn versus morphine in patients undergoing lumber disk surgery. Anesth Analg 1998; 86(10):1045-50.
  • 4. Sener M, Yilmazer C, Yilmaz I, Caliskan E, Donmez A, Arslan G. Patient-controlled analgesia with lornoxicam vs. dipyrone for acute postoperative pain relief after septorhinoplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008; 25(2):177-82.
  • 5.Flouvat B, Leneveu A, Fitoussi S, Delhotal-Landes B, Gendron A. Bioequivalence study comparing a new paracetamol solution for injection and propacetamol after single intravenous infusion in healthy subjects. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004;42(1):50-7.
  • 6. Shibata M, Ohkubo T, Takashi H, Inoki R. Modified formalin test, characteristic biphasic pain response. Pain 1989; 38(3):347-52.
  • 7. Li GY, Yang BX, Liu H. Analgesic actions after local peripheral administration of Lornoxicam in a model of formalin test in the rat. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2005; 36(6): 703-5.
  • 8. Woolf CJ, Chong MS: Preemptive analgesia treating postopertive pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anest Analg 1993;77:362-79.
  • 9. Campbell WB. Lipid-drived autocoids: eicosanoids and plateled activating factor. In: Goodman AG, Roll TW,.Neis AS, Taylor P edds. Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, eight (international) edition. New York Mc Grow-Hill, 1991: 600-617.
  • 10. Abbott FV, Ocvirk R, Najafee R, Franklin KB. Improving the efficiency of the formalin test. Pain 1999;83(5):561-9.
  • 11. Arici S, Gurbet A, Turker G, Yavaşcaoglu B, Sahin S. Preemptive analgesic effects of intravenous paracetamol in total abdominal hysterectomy. Agri. 2009;21(1):54-61.
  • 12. Kokhno VN, Shmerko PS, Shakhtarin IIu. Impact of preemptive analgesia on postoperative pain syndrome in laparoscopic surgery. Anesteziol Reanimatol 2009;6(1):68-70.
  • 13. Liu ZF, Wang XJ, Wang XC, Zhu L, Qiao Q. Clinical study of preoperative analgesia for liposuction. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2007;23(2):128-9.
  • 14. Borisov DB, Levin AV, Vyl’iurov IV, Sokolov AV, Nedashkovski Ä EV. Efficiency of preemptive intravenous paracetamol analgesia in abdominal surgery. Anesteziol Reanimatol 2007;5(1):38-40.
  • 15. Toygar P, Akkaya T, Ozkan D, Ozel O, Uslu E Does iv paracetamol have preemptive analgesic effect on lumber disc surgeries? Agri 2008;20(1):14-9.
  • 16. Bruno E.Porcellini A, Farronato GP, et al. II dolore postestrattivo. Trattamento analgesico con piroxicam. Dental Cadmos 1987;14(1):61-8.
  • 17. Marcucci M.Panelli G.Cambini S. Clinical experience in the treatment of dental pain. Clin J Pain. 1991;75:72-76
  • 18. Yegül İ. Ağrı ve tedavisi, 1993, s1-15.
  • 19. Yücel A, Özyalçm S. Çocukluk çağında ağrı, 2002; s17-9
  • 20. Hein A, Norlander C, Blom L, Jakobsson J. Is pain prophylaxis in minor gynaecological surgery of clinical value? a double-blind placebo controlled study of paracetamol 1 g versus lornoxicam 8 mg given orally. Ambul Surg 2001;9(1):91-4.
  • 21. Akcali GE, Iskender A, Demiraran Y, Kayikci A, Yalcin GS, Cam K, Balcioglu YO. Randomized comparison of efficacy of paracetamol, lornoxicam, and tramadol representing three different groups of analgesics for pain control in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 2010;24(5):615-20.
  • 22. Raj P, Prithvi A. Ağrı taksonomisi, Editor. Erdine S, Ağrı, 2000; s12-9.
  • 23. Özyalçın S: Preemptif analjezi, Ağrı Dergisi 1998;7(1):5-10.
Dicle Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-2945
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1963
  • Yayıncı: Cahfer GÜLOĞLU