Ahmet Kürşat ÇULHAOĞLU, Serhat Emre ÖZKIR, Fatoş TÜRKKAL

POLİETER ETER KETON (PEEK) ve DENTAL KULLANIMI

Poliaril eter keton ailesinin yüksek ısı polimeri olan polieter eter keton (PEEK) semikristalin bir termoplastiktir. Yüksek mekanik fiziksel özelliklere, aynı zamanda termal ve boyutsal stabiliteye sahip PEEK, birçok endüstri alanında metallere alternatif görülen ender polimerlerdendir. Yüksek aşınma direncine sahip olan ve kimyasal ajanlara karşı dayanıklı bir materyal olan PEEK, uygun biyomekanik özellikleri, uzun ömürlü oluşu ve biyouyumluluğu ile 1990'ların sonunda özellikle medikal alanda, ortopedide metal bileşenli implantlara alternatif olarak kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Kemiğe yakın elastisite modülü ile implant materyali olarak da kullanılan bu materyal, dental alanda özellikle de protetik diş tedavilerinde kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu derlemede PEEK materyalinin yapısı, özellikleri ve dental kullanım alanları anlatılmıştır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Polieter Eter Keton (PEEK), termoplastik, protez POLYETER ETHER KETONE (PEEK)” AND ITS DENTAL USE PolyetherEther Ketone (PEEK), is a semi-crystalline high-temperature thermoplastic polymer in polyaryl ether ketone family. PEEK of high mechanic and physical features, thermal and dimensional stability, is one of rare polymers seen as an alternative to metal materials in many industrial fields. With its features like, high-corrosion and chemical resistance and compatible bio-mechanic features, long-life and bio-compatibility, PEEK began to be used especially in medicine as high-performance thermoplastic material alternative to metal-composite implants in orthopedics in the late 1990’s. PEEK is used as an implant material, because of its elasticity module. That’s why it is used as a prosthetic material in dentistry. In this study, the structure, general features and the use of PEEK material are explained.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Polieter Eter Keton (PEEK), termoplastik

PDF

___

1. Adler S, Kistler S, Kistler F. Compression-moulding rather than milling: a wealth of possible applications for high performance polymers. Quintessenz Zahntechnik 2013;39: 376-384.
2. Agarwal R, Gonzalez-Garcı C, Torstrick B, Guldberga RE, Salmeron-Sanchez M, Garcı AJ. Simple coating with fibronectin fragment enhances stainless steel screw osseoin- tegrationin healthy and osteoporoticrats. Biomaterials 2015; 63: 137-145.
3. Arda T, Arikan A. An in vitro comparison of retentive force and deformation of acetal resin and cobalt-chromium clasps. J. Prosthet Dent 2005; 267-274.
4. Asvanund P, Morgano SM. Photoelalastic stress analysis of external versus internal implant-abutment connections. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106(4): 266-71.
5. Barao VA, Mathew MT, Assuncao WG, Yuan JC, Wimmer MA, Sukotjo C. Stability of cp-ti and ti–6al–4 valloy for dental implants as a function of saliva ph–an electro chemical study. Clin. Oral. Implant. Res. 2012; 23(9): 1055-1062.
6. Barao VA, Yoon CJ, Mathew MT, Yuan JC, Wu CD, Sukotjo C. Attachment of porphyromon as gingivalis to corroded com- mercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy. J. Periodontol. 2014; 85(9): 1275-1282.
7. Beuer F, Steff B, Naumann M, Sorensen JA. Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures with different computer-aided design (cad)/ computer-aided manufacturing (cam) fabricated materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009; 116: 381-386.
8. Camarini E, Tomeh J, Dias R, Da Silva E. Reconstruction of frontal bone using specific implant polyether-ether-ketone. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22: 2205-7.
9. Chen F, Gatea S, Ou H, Lu B, Long H. Fracture characteristics of PEEK at various stress triaxialities. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 64: 173-186.
10. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cages. Surg Neurol. 2004; 62: 378-85.
11. Diefenbeck M, Muckley T, Schrader C, Schmidt J, Zankovych S, Bossert J, Jandt KD, Faucon M, Finger U. The effect of plasma chemical oxidation of titanium alloy on bone- implant contact in rats. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 8041-8047.
12. Donovan TE, Cho GC. Esthetic considerations with removable partial dentures. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003; 31: 551-557.
13. Fan JP, Tsui CP, Tang CY, Chow CL. Influence of interphase layer on the overall elasto-plastic behaviors of ha/PEEK biocomposite. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 5363-73.
14. Fueki K, Ohkubo C, Yatabe M. Clinical application of removable partial dentures using thermoplastic resin-part ı: definition and indication of non-metal clasp dentures. J Prosthodont Res. 2014; 58: 3-10.
15. Gok H, Onen MR, Yıldırım H, Gulec I, Naderi S. Empty Bladed PEEK Cage For Interbody Fusion After Anterior Cervical Discectomy. Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26(1):105-10 doi: 10. 5137 /1019. JTN. 9376-13.1
16. Gornet MF, Chan FW, Coleman JC, Murrell B, Nockels RP, Taylor BA, Ochoa JA. Biomechanical assessment of a PEEK rod system for semi-rigid fixation of lumbar fusion constructs. J Biomech Eng. 2011; 133(8): 081009.
17. Gracis S, Nicholls JI, Chalupnik JD, Yuodelis RA. Shock absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1991; 4: 282-91.
18. Ha WS, Hauert R, Ernst HK, Wintermantel E. Surface analysis of chemicallyetched and plasma-treated polyether ether ketone (PEEK) for biomedical applications, surface coatings technology 1997; 96: 293-299.
19. Hahnel S, Wieser A, Lang R, Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. [epub ahead of print], 2014.
20. Hee HT, Kundnani V. Rationale for use of polyether ether ketone polymer interbody cage device in cervical spine surgery. Spine J. 2010; 10: 66–9.
21. Invibio Biomaterial Polymer Solutions. New material options for innovation in restorative and prosthetic dentistry, 2011.
22. Ito M, Wee AG, Miyamoto T. The combination of a nylon and traditional partial removable dental prosthesis for improved esthetics: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2013; 109: 5-8.
23. Ivoclar Vivadent. Lithium disilicate (LS2) scientific report, 2011.
24. Khonsari RH, Berthier P, Rouillon T, Perrina JP, Crre P. Severe infectious complications after PEEK-derived implant placement: report ofthree cases. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medicine, and Pathology 2014; 26: 477-482.
25. Kistler F, Adler S, Kistler S. PEEK-hochleistungskuns tstoffeimimplantat-prothetis chen workflow. Implantologie J. 2013; 7: 17-42.
26. Kolbeck C, Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008; 19: 1049-1053.
27. Koutouzis T, Richardson J, Lundgren T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. J Oral Implantol. 2011; 37: 174-82.
28. Kuo MC, Tsai CM, Huang JC, Chen M. PEEK composites reinforced by nano-sized sio2 and al2o3 particulates. Mater Chem Phys. 2011; 90: 185-95.
29. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007; 28(32): 4845-4869.
30. Lethaus B, Safi Y, Ter Laak-Poort M, Kloss-Brandstatter A, Banki F, Robbenmenke C, Kessler P. Cranioplasty with customized titanium and PEEK implants in a mechanical stress model. J Neurotrauma 2012; 29(6): 1077-1083.
31. Maharaj G, Bleser S, Albert K, Lambert R, Jani S, Jamison R. Characterization of wear in composite material orthopaedic implants. part ı: the composite trunnion/ceramic head interface. Biomed Mater Eng. 1994; 4: 193-8.
32. Mate Sanchez De-Val JE, Gomez-Moreno G, Martınez CP, Fernandez MP, Marın JM, Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL. Peri-implant tissue behavior around non-titanium material: experimental study in dogs. ann. anat. http://dxdoi. org/10.1016/j.aanat.2016.03.005, 2016 [epubaheadofprint].
33. Mathew MT, Abbey S, Hallab NJ, Hall DJ, Sukotjo C, Wimmer MA. Influence of ph on the tribocorrosion behavior of cpti in the oral environment: synergistic inter- actions of wear and corrosion. j. biomed. mater. res. b appl. Biomater. 2012; 100(6): 1662-1671.
34. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res . 2016; 60(1): 12-19.
35. Neugebauer J, Adler S, Kisttler F. The use of plastics in fixed prosthetic implant restoration. Zwr- German Dent J. 2013; 122: 242-245.
36. Neumann EA, Villar CC, Franca FM. Fracture resistance of abutment screws made of titanium, polyetheretherketone, and carbon fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 28(1): 1-5.
37. Palau CS, Nicolas TJ, Barbera BM, Termes CJ. Use of poly ether ether ketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 112: 680-2.
38. Patel P, Hull T, Cabe RW, Flath D, Grasmeder J, Percy M. Mechanism of thermal decomposition of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK) from a review of decomposition studies. Polymer Degradation and Stability 2010; 95: 709-718.
39. Pokorny D, Fulin P, Slouf M, Jahoda D, Landor I, Sosna A. Polyether ether ketone (PEEK). part ıı: application in clinical practice. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol cech. 2010; 77: 470-8.
40. Poon RWY, Yeung KWK, Liu XY, Chu PK, Chung CY, Lu WW, Cheung KMC, Chan D. Carbon plasma immer- sion ion implantation of nickel-titanium shape memory alloys. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 2265-2272.
41. Rodriguez, E. Poly ether ether ketone custom-made implants for cranio facial defects: report of 14 cases and review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015; 43(7): 1232-1238.
42. Rubert SC, Calas MD, Barberá A. Analysis of the feeding system in the injection process of PEEK in fixed partial dentures. Procedia Engineering 2015; 132: 1021-1028.
43. Sampaio M, Buciumeanu M, Henriques B, Silva FS, Souza JC, Gomes JR. Tribocorrosion behavior of veneering biome- dical PEEK to ti6al4v structures. j. mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016; 54: 123-130.
44. Sarot JR, Contar CM, Cruz AC, Desouza magini R. Evaluation of the stress distribution in cfr-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2010; 21: 2079-2085.
45. Sasuga TH, Hagiwara M. Radiation deterioration of several aromatic polymers under oxidative conditions. Polymer 1987; 28: 1915-21.
46. Schwitalla A, Muller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol. 2013; 39(6): 743-749.
47. Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, Lackmann J, Muller WD. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of PEEK dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech. 2015; 48(1): 1-7.
48. Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Beuer F, Lackmann J, Muller WD. The applicability of PEEK-based abutment screws. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 63: 244-251.
49. Siewert B, Parra M. A new group of material in dentistry. PEEK as a framework material used in 12-piece implant-supported bridges. Z Zahnarzt Implantol. 2013; 29: 148-159.
50. Souza JCM, Barbosa SL, Ariza E, Celis JP, Rocha LA. Simultaneous degradation by corrosion and wear of titanium in artificial saliva containing fluorides. Wear 2012; 292-293: 82-88.
51. Sproesser O, Schmidlin PR, Uhrenbacher J, Eichberger M, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Work of adhesion between resin composite cements and PEEK as a function of etching duration with sulfuric acid and its correlation with bond strength values. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives 2014; (54): 184-190.
52. Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR. Three-unit reinforced poly ether ether ketone composite fdps: influence off abrication method on load bearing capacity and failure types. J Dent Mater. 2015; 34: 7-12.
53. Stawarczyk B, Bahr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Schmidlin PR. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig. 2014; 18(1): 163-170.
54. Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Ozcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of cad/cam milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16: 1669-1677.
55. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, Ozcan M, Hämmerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resinsand industrially fabricated cad/cam blocks versusglass–ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012; 31: 377-83.
56. Steinberg EL, Rath E, Shlaifer A, Chechik O, Maman E, Salai M. Carbon fiber reinforced PEEK optima- a composite material biomechanical properties and wear/debris characteristics of cf-PEEK composites for orthopedic trauma implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013; 17: 221-228.
57. Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dental Mater. 2012; 28: 273-8.
58. Taskonak B, Mecholsky JR, Anusavice KJ. Residual stresses in bilayer dental ceramics. Biomaterials 2006; 26: 3235-3241.
59. Taufall S, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Fracture load and failure types of different veneered polyetheretherketone fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20(9): 2493-2500.
60. Turner J, Paller D, Murrell C. The mechanical effect of commercially pure titanium and poly ether ether ether ketone rods on spinal implants at the operative and adjacent levels. Spine 2010; 35: e1076-82.
61. Wang L, Weng L, Song S, Zhang Z, Tian S, Ma R. Characterization of polyether ether ketone–hydroxyapatite nanocomposite materials. Materials Science and Engineering 2011; 528: 3689-3696.
62. Williams D. New horizons for thermoplastic polymers. Med Device Technol. 2001; 12(4): 8-9.
63. Zhou L, Qian Y, Zhu Y, Liu H, Gan K, Guo J. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of PEEK composite materials. Dent Mater. 2014; 30(8): e209-215.
64. Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Polyzois G. Using modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative material for endocrown restorations: a short-term clinical report. J Prosthet, 2016.