Şenay CANAY, Güliz AKTA

Platform switch konsepti nedir?

Dental implantların uzun dönem baş arısı, implant etrafındaki krestal kemik desteğ ine bağ lıdır. Krestal kemik miktarının korunmasında platform switch konseptinin etkili olduğ u düş ünülmektedir. Bu derlemede platform switch konsepti ve onunla ilgili olan anahtar kelimeler kullanılarak Pubmed ve Google Akademik veri tabanında literatür taraması yapıldı. Elde edilen literatürlerle konseptin etkisi üç ana baş lık (biyomekanik davranış , krestal kemik seviyesi, yumuş ak doku seviyesi) altında değ erlendirildi. Platform switch konseptinin krestal kemik kaybını azalttığ ı ve daha estetik sonuçların alındığ ını gösteren çalış maların yanısıra herhangi bir etkisinin olmadığ ını gösteren çalış malar da bulunmaktadır. Platform switch konseptinin etkinliğ inin değ erlendirilmesi için uzun dönemli randomize klinik çalış malara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır.

What is platform switch concept?

The long term success of implant depends on the stability of bone support for the implant. It was thought that the concept of platform switching, effects the crestal bone preservation. The literature dealing with the platform switching concept was assessed on Pubmed and Google Scholar data base. Manuscripts were evaluated according to three main topic (biomechanical behavior, crestal bone level, soft tissue level). Besides the studies showing that platform switching reduces the crestal bone loss and maintains more esthetic results, there are also some studies showing that platform switching has no effect on esthetics and bone level. Long term randomized clinical trials should be required.

PDF

___

1. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol 1992;63(12):995-996.
2. Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, Thams U, San Roman F, Favero GA, et al. Interimplant distance and crestal bone resorption: a histologic study in the canine mandible. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6(3):150-156.
3. Hurzeler M, Fickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel HC. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform- switched abutments: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(7 Suppl 1):33-39.
4. Pieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Influence of implant- abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(1):169- 178.
5. Prosper L, Redaelli S, Pasi M, Zarone F, Radaelli G, Gherlone EF. A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(2):299-308.
6. Canullo L, Iannello G, Penarocha M, Garcia B. Impact of implant diameter on bone level changes around platform switched implants: preliminary results of 18 months follow-up a prospective randomized match-paired controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(10):1142-1146.
7. Gardner D. Platform switching as a means to achieving implant esthetics. N Y State Dent J 2005;71(3):34-37.
8. Luongo R, Traini T, Guidone PC, Bianco G, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Hard and soft tissue responses to the platform-switching technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28(6):551-557.
9. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: a new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26(1):9-17.
10. Priest GF. The esthetic challenge of adjacent implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65(7 Suppl 1):2-12.
11. Chow YC, Wang HL. Factors and techniques influencing peri-implant papillae. Implant Dent 2010;19(3):208-219.
12. Hermann F, Lerner H, Palti A. Factors influencing the preservation of the periimplant marginal bone. Implant Dent 2007;16(2):165-175.
13. Canullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(6):995-1000.
14. Cappiello M, Luongo R, Di Iorio D, Bugea C, Cocchetto R, Celletti R. Evaluation of peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28(4):347-355.
15. Krishna Prasad D MS, Neha Bansal, Chethan Hegde. Platform Switching: An answer to crestal bone loss. Journal of Dental Implants 2011;1(1):13-17.
16. Trammell K, Geurs NC, O'Neal SJ, Liu PR, Haigh SJ, McNeal S, Kenealy JN, Reddy MS. A prospective, randomized, controlled comparison of platform-switched and matched-abutment implants in short- span partial denture situations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29(6):599-605.
17. Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hurzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(3):577-581.
18. Bilhan H, Mumcu E, Erol S, Kutay O. Influence of platform-switching on marginal bone levels for implants with mandibular overdentures: a retrospective clinical study. Implant Dent 2010;19(3):250-258. Published online: 05 February 2013
19. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri- implant tissue. Part 3: A histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15(3):425- 431.
20. Matarasso S, Rasperini G, Iorio Siciliano V, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Aglietta M. A 10-year retrospective analysis of radiographic bone-level changes of implants supporting single-unit crowns in periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(9):898-903.
21. Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, Kim S, Chun HJ. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21(5):789-794.
22. Canay S, Akca K. Biomechanical aspects of bone-level diameter shifting at implant-abutment interface. Implant Dent 2009;18(3):239-248.
23. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100(6):422-431.
24. Schrotenboer J, Tsao YP, Kinariwala V, Wang HL. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis. Implant Dent 2009;18(3):260-269.
25. Tabata LF, Assuncao WG, Adelino Ricardo Barao V, de Sousa EA, Gomes EA, Delben JA. Implant platform switching: biomechanical approach using two-dimensional finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21(1):182-187.
26. Chang CL, Chen CS, Hsu ML. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):295-304.
27. Pessoa RS, Vaz LG, Marcantonio E, Jr, Vander Sloten J, Duyck J, Jaecques SV. Biomechanical evaluation of platform switching in different implant protocols: computed tomography-based three- dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(5):911-919.
28. Maeda Y, Horisaka M, Yagi K. Biomechanical rationale for a single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(3):271- 275.
29. Tabata LF, Rocha EP, Barao VA, Assuncao WG. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(3):482-491.
30. Wagenberg B, Froum SJ. Prospective study of 94 platform-switched implants observed from 1992 to 2006. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(1):9-17.
31. Romanos GE, Nentwig GH. Immediate functional loading in the maxilla using implants with platform switching: five-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(6):1106-1112.
32. Prosper L, Crespi R, Valenti E, Cappare P, Gherlone E. Five-year follow-up of wide-diameter implants placed in fresh molar extraction sockets in the mandible: immediate versus delayed loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(3):607- 612.
33. Canullo L, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Double-blind randomized controlled trial study on post-extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform concept: soft tissue response. Preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(4):414-420.
34. Calvo Guirado JL, Ortiz Ruiz AJ, Gomez Moreno G, Lopez Mari L, Bravo Gonzalez LA. Immediate loading and immediate restoration in 105 expanded-platform implants via the Diem System after a 16-month follow-up period. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13(9):E576-81.
35. Cocchetto R, Traini T, Caddeo F, Celletti R. Evaluation of hard tissue response around wider platform- switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010;30(2):163- 171.
36. Vela-Nebot X, Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Rodado-Alonso C, Segala-Torres M. Benefits of an implant platform modification technique to reduce crestal bone resorption. Implant Dent 2006;15(3):313-320.
37. Vigolo P, Givani A. Platform- switched restorations on wide- diameter implants: a 5-year clinical prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(1):103- 109.
38. Enkling N, Johren P, Klimberg V, Bayer S, Mericske-Stern R, Jepsen S. Effect of platform switching on peri- implant bone levels: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22(10):1185-1192.
39. Becker J, Ferrari D, Mihatovic I, Sahm N, Schaer A, Schwarz F. Stability of crestal bone level at platform-switched non-submerged titanium implants: a histomorphometrical study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36(6):532- 539.
40. Bateli M, Att W, Strub JR. Implant neck configurations for preservation of marginal bone level: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(2):290-303.
41. Canullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal bone-level alterations: the results of a randomized-controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21(1):115-121.
42. Degidi M, Iezzi G, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Immediately loaded titanium implant with a tissue- stabilizing/maintaining design ('beyond platform switch') retrieved from man after 4 weeks: a histological and histomorphometrical evaluation. A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19(3):276-282.
43. Sorni-Broker M, Penarrocha-Diago M. Factors that influence the position of the peri-implant soft tissues: a review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009;14(9):e475-479.
44. Tarnow DP, Cho SC, Wallace SS. The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest. J Periodontol 2000;71(4):546- 549.
45. Rodriguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segala-Torres M, Calvo-Guirado JL, Cambra J, Mendez-Blanco V, et al. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform- switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29(2):141- 151.