MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS OF TAX PAYMENT TYPES FOR CORPORATE TAXPAYER

Öz This article analyzes corporate tax returns from tax evasion based on corporate taxpayers’ payment types. A tax payment function is generated for tax evasion and four payment types of the tax evader are included. An application is provided to compare tax returns under new draft tax procedural law and existing law. The results demonstrate that: (1) after implementation of new draft law, 17% more tax return can be generated compared to honest tax return from settlement; (2) tax administration needs to raise audit rates to a mean of 41% to force corporate taxpayer to point of indifference; (3) the agent of the corporation will prefer payment types of remorse exemption, settlement, after statutory period and reduction in order; (4) the government should implement new policies to prevent corporate taxpayer from paying two times the amount of fine per tax item.

___

  • Akbey, F. (2014). An inquisition on tax audits and revenues in Turkey. Dokuz Eylul University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences; 29(1): 63-103 Allingham, M.G. & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis, Journal of Public Economics; 1: 323-338 Alm, J., McClelland, G.H. & Schulze, W.D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics; 48(1): 21-38 Altundis, M. (2007). Tax crimes and penalties imposed in TPL and the effects of new Turkish criminal law on these crimes. Journal of Ankara Bar Association; 65(1):168-179 Fukofuka, P. (2013). The contextual framework of corporate income tax evasion. Journal of Accounting and Taxation; 5(2): 27-37 Hindriks, J. & Myles, G.D. (2006). Intermediate Public Economics, (2nd Ed.), The MIT Press, Massachusetts. Schneider, F., Raczkowski, K. & Mröz, B. (2015). Shadow economy and tax evasion in the EU. Journal of Money Laundering Control; 18(1): 34-51 Slemrod, J. & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, evasion and administration. Handbook of Public Economics, Volume 3, North Holland, Amsterdam Dhami, S. and al-Nowaihi, A. (2006). Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory. https://www2.le.ac.uk, Access date: 18.08.2017 Istanbul Chamber of Certified Public Accountants (2016). The Draft TPL Evaluation Commission Report. http://archive.ismmmo.org.tr/Mansetler/MEVZUAT/Duyuru/VUK_TasariTaslakKomisyonRapor.pdf_431.pdf, Access date: 21.08.2016 Lipatov, V. (2005). Corporate tax evasion: The case for specialists. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Paper No. 33998, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/33998/, Access date: 19 August 2016 Tax Audit Committee (2016). 2012-2015 Activity Reports. http://www.vdk.gov.tr/default.aspx?nsw=dciSsil8zCRLPP9XnV0K5Q==-H7deC+LxBI8=&nm=1048, Access date: 10 August 2016 Tax Net (2016). Tax fraud crimes and penalties. http://www.verginet.net/dtt/2/359Kacakciliksuclarivecezalari_3197.aspx, Access date: 28 August 2016 Tax Inspectors Foundation (2016). An example for a limited company audited. http://www.vmv.org.tr/Yay%C4%B1n/10, Access date: 28.05.2016 Turkish Revenue Administration (2016a). The number of active corporate taxpayers. http://www.gib.gov.tr/fileadmin/user_upload/VI/20151.htm, Access date: 01 August 2016 Turkish Revenue Administration (2016b). Central government budget revenues. http://www.gib.gov.tr/fileadmin/user_upload/VI/GBG/Tablo_22.xls.htm, Access date: 08.08.2016 Turkish Revenue Administration (2007). Settlement in resolving tax disputes with the tax administration. www.gib.gov.tr/fileadmin/user_upload/yayinlar/uzlasma.pdf, Access date: 28.06.2016 Turkish Revenue Administration (2016c). Strategy Development Department 2011-2015 Activity Reports. http://www.gib.gov.tr/kurumsal/stratejik-yonetim/faaliyet-raporlari, Access date: 10.05.2016 Turkish Revenue Administration (2016d). Special irregularity fine. http://www.gib.gov.tr/node/83111, Access date: 28.08.2016 Yavaslar, F.B. (2015). Surcharges and penalties in tax law. Turkey’s national report. www.eatlp.org/uploads/public/2015/National%20report%20Turkey.pdf, Access date: 04.05.2016
Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-8880
  • Yayın Aralığı: 2
  • Başlangıç: 2013
  • Yayıncı: Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

FAKTÖR ANALİZİ YÖNTEMİ İLE TÜRKİYE VE AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ ÜYESİ ÜLKELERİN SOSYO-EKONOMİK GÖSTERGELER BAKIMINDAN GELİŞMİŞLİK DÜZEYLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Çiğdem KOŞAR TAŞ, Sibel ÖRK ÖZEL

TÜKETİCİLERİN SATIN ALMA NİYETLERİ VE BOYKOTA YÖNELİK TUTUMLARININ TÜKETİCİ SİNİZMİ, FİYAT ŞEFFAFLIĞI VE FİYAT ADALETİ BAĞLAMINDA İNCELENMESİ

Kalender Özcan ATILGAN, Talip İNCE, Sinan YILMAZ

VERGİ USUL KANUNU’NDA YER ALAN TEBLİĞE İLİŞKİN HÜKÜMLERDE 7061 SAYILI KANUN’LA YAPILAN DEĞİŞİKLİKLER: BİLİNEN ADRES & KAPIYA YAPIŞTIRMA USULÜ

Neslihan COŞKUN KARADAĞ, Ahmet İNNECİ

THE INTERRELATEDNESS OF CHARACTER AND NATURE IN KATHERINE MANSFIELD’S “PRELUDE”

Özge GÜVENÇ

İÇ MEKAN TASARIMINDA RENK ARMONİSİ

Tülay Özdemir Canbolat

CEBİRSEL SÖZEL PROBLEMLERDE UYGULANAN ÇÖZÜM STRATEJİLERİNİN VE YAPILAN HATALARIN ANALİZİ: ORTAOKUL ÖRNEKLEMİ

Ayten Pınar Bal, Ahmet Karacaoğlu

E-DEVLET SİSTEMİNE ADAPTASYONUN TEKNOLOJİ KABUL MODELİYLE ARAŞTIRILMASI

Serap Çabuk, Deniz Zeren, Nilüfer Gökdağlı

İNGİLİZCE EV ÖDEVLERİNE YÖNELİK ÖĞRETMEN GÖRÜŞLERİ

İşıl SÖNMEZ EKTEM, Sanem Büşra YILDIZ

KRİZLERİN TÜRK TURİZM SEKTÖRÜNÜN FİNANSAL DURUMUNA VE PİYASA DUYARLILIĞINA ETKİSİ: 1999-2015 DÖNEMİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA

Gamze Vural, Halil İbrahim Uçar

TÜKETİM DEĞERLERİ, SATIN ALMA NİYETİ VE SATIN ALMA DAVRANIŞI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLERİN İNCELENMESİ: FONKSİYONEL GIDALAR ÜZERİNE BİR ÇALIŞMA

Fatma Demirci Orel, Merve Bozdemir, Naz Demirkılıç