___

• [1] B. R. Bhonsle, A relation between Laplace and Hankel transforms, Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc., 5(3) (1962), 114-115.
• [2] B. R. Bhonsle, A relation between Laplace and Hankel transforms, Math. Japon., 10 (1965), 84-89.
• [3] A. Erde ́lyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, F. G. Tricomi, Higher Transcendental Functions, vol. II, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1953.
• [4] A. Erde ́lyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, F. G. Tricomi, Tables of Integral Transforms, vol. II, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1954.
• [5] K. C. Sharma, Theorems relating Hankel and Meijer’s Bessel transforms, Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc., 6 (1963), 107–112.
• [6] K. C. Gupta, S. M. Agrawal, Unified theorems involving H-function transform and Meijer Bessel function transform, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.), 96 (2) (1987), 125-130.
• [7] S. P . Goyal, S. K. Vasishta, Certain relations between generalized Kontorovitch-Lebdev transform and H-function transform, Ranchi Univ. Math. Jour., 6 (1975), 95-102.
• [8] S. P. Goyal, R. M. Jain, Certain results for two-dimensional Laplace transform with applications, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 59(A) (III) (1989), 407-414.
• [9] L. Landau, Monotonicity and bounds for Bessel functions, Proceedings of the Symposium on Mathematical Physics and Quantum Field Theory (Berkeley, California: June 11-13, 1999) (Warchall. H, Editor), Electron J. Differential Equations, Conf. Vol. 04(2000), 147-154.
• [10] L. J. Landau, Bessel functions: Monotonicity and bounds, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 61(1)(2000), 197-215.
• [11] A. P. Prudnikov, Yu. A. Brychkov, O. I, Marichev, Integrals and Series: Volume 2. Elementary Functions, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1986.
• [12] A. P. Prudnikov, Yu. A. Brychkov, O. I, Marichev, Integrals and Series: Volume 2. Special Functions, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 1986.
• [13] I. N. Sneddon, Fourier Transforms, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951.
• [14] R. K. Saxena, A relation between generalized Laplace and Hankel transforms, Math. Zeitschr., 81 (1963), 414-415
• [15] H. M. Srivastava, A relation between Meijer and generalized Hankel transforms, Math. Japon., 11 (1966), 11-13.
• [16] H. M. Srivastava, On a relation between Laplace and Hankel transforms, Matematiche (Catania), 21 (1966), 199-202.
• [17] H. M. Srivastava, O. D. Vyas, A theorem relating generalized Hankel and Whittaker transforms, Indagationes Mathematicae (Proceedings), 72(2) (1969), 140-144.
• [18] H. M. Srivastava, Some remarks on a generalization of the Stieltjes transform, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 23 (1976), 119-122.
• [19] H. M. Srivastava, V. K. Tuan, A new convolution theorem for the Stieltjes transform & its application to a class of singular integral equations, Arch. Math. (Basel) 64(2) (1995), 144-149.
• [20] H.M.Srivastava,O.Yu ̈rekli,AtheoremonaStieltjes-typeintegraltransform&itsapplications,ComplexVariables, Theory Appl., 28(2) (1995), 159-168.
• [21] S. Yakubovich, M. Martins, On the iterated Stieltjes transform & its convolution with application to singular integral equations, Integral Transforms Spec. Funct., 25(5) (2013), doi: 10.1080/10652469.2013.868457