Ö. ALTINDAĞ, N. ÇANKAYA M., A. YALÇINKAYA, H. AYDOĞDU

3316

Statistical inference for the burr type III distribution under type II censored data

In this study, estimation and prediction problems for the Burr typeIII distribution under type II censored data are considered. Maximum likelihood and maximum product spacing estimation methods are used to estimatemodel parameters. EM algorithm is employed to obtain maximum likelihoodestimates. Unobserved future order statistics are predicted with best unbiasedprediction method. A simulation study is carried out to exhibit performanceof the estimation methods. Further, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the usefulness of the Burr III distribution
Keywords:

Burr III distribution, type II censoring maximum likelihood, EMalgorithm, maximum product spacing, inference,

PDF

___

  • Burr, I. W. (1942). Cumulative frequency functions. The Annals of mathematical statistics 13(2): 215-232.
  • Lindsay, S. R., et al. (1996). Modelling the diameter distribution of forest stands using the Burr distribution. Journal of Applied Statistics 23(6): 609-619.
  • Shao, Q. (2000). Estimation for hazardous concentrations based on NOEC toxicity data: an alternative approach. Environmetrics 11(5): 583-595.
  • Zimmer, W. J., et al. (1998). The Burr XII distribution in reliability analysis. Journal of Quality Technology 30(4): 386.
  • AbdelGhaly, A. A., et al. (1997). The use of Burr type XII distribution on software reliability growth modelling. Microelectronics and Reliability 37(2): 305-313.
  • Shankar, G. and Sahani, V. (1994). The Study of a Maintenance Float Model with Burr Failure Distribution. Microelectronics and Reliability 34(9): 1513-1517.
  • Liu, P. H. and Chen, F. L. (2006). Process capability analysis of non-normal process data using the Burr XII distribution. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 27(9-10): 975-984.
  • Gove, J. H., et al. (2008). Rotated sigmoid structures in managed uneven-aged northern hardwood stands: a look at the Burr Type III distribution. Forestry 81(2): 161-176.
  • Kar, R., et al. (2010). A closed form Delay Evaluation Approach using Burr’s Distribution Function for High Speed On-Chip RC Interconnects. 2010 Ieee 2nd International Advance Computing Conference : 129-133.
  • Ganora, D. and Laio, F. (2015). Hydrological Applications of the Burr Distribution: Practical Method for Parameter Estimation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 20(11).
  • Rodriguez, R. N. (1977). A guide to the Burr type XII distributions. Biometrika 64(1): 129- 134.
  • Tadikamalla, P. R. (1980). A look at the Burr and related distributions. International Sta- tistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique : 337-344.
  • Zoraghi, N., et al. (2012). Estimating the four parameters of the Burr III distribution using a hybrid method of variable neighborhood search and iterated local search algorithms. Applied Mathematics and Computation 218(19): 9664-9675.
  • Wingo, D. R. (1993). Maximum likelihood estimation of Burr XII distribution parameters under type II censoring. Microelectronics Reliability 33(9): 1251-1257.
  • Wang, F.K. and Cheng, Y. (2010). EM algorithm for estimating the Burr XII parameters with multiple censored data. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 26(6): 615-630.
  • Panahi, H. and Sayyareh, A. (2014). Parameter estimation and prediction of order statistics for the Burr Type XII distribution with Type II censoring. Journal of Applied Statistics 41(1): 215-232.
  • Moradi, N., et al. (2014). Estimation of the parameters of a exponentiated Burr type III distribution under type II censoring. Journal of Statistical Sciences 8(1): 93-109.
  • Azizi, A. Z., et al. (2013). Inference about the Burr type III distribution under type-II hybrid censored data. Journal of Statistical Research of Iran 10(2): 209-233.
  • Singh, D. P., et al. (2016). Estimation and prediction for a Burr III distribution with progres- sive censoring. Communication in Statistics - Theory and Methods. Accepted manuscript. DOI:10.1080/03610926.2016.1213290.
  • Louis, T. A. (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological): 226-233.
  • Dempster, A. P., et al. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algo- rithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological): 1-38.
  • Ng, H., et al. (2002). Estimation of parameters from progressively censored data using EM algorithm. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 39(4): 371-386.
  • Kundu, D. and Pradhan, B. (2009). Estimating the parameters of the generalized exponential distribution in presence of hybrid censoring. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 38(12): 2030-2041.
  • Cheng, R. and Amin, N. (1983). Estimating parameters in continuous univariate distributions with a shifted origin. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological): 394- 403.
  • Ranneby, B. (1984). The maximum spacing method. An estimation method related to the maximum likelihood method. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics : 93-112.
  • Ekström, M. (2008). Alternatives to maximum likelihood estimation based on spacings and the Kullback–Leibler divergence. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138(6): 1778- 1791.
  • Ng, H., et al. (2012). Parameter estimation of three-parameter Weibull distribution based on progressively Type-II censored samples. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 82(11): 1661-1678.
  • Mann, N. R. and Fertig, K. W. (1973). Tables for obtaining Weibull con…dence bounds and tolerance bounds based on best linear invariant estimates of parameters of the extreme-value distribution. Technometrics 15(1): 87-101.
  • Prakash, G. and Singh, D. (2009). A Bayesian shrinkage approach in Weibull type-II censored data using prior point information. REVSTAT–Statistical Journal 7(2): 171-187.
  • Crowder, M.J., et al. (1991). Statistical Analysis of Reliability Data. Great Britain: Chap- mann&Hall.
  • D’agostino, R.B. and Stephens, M.A. (1986). Goodness of Fit Techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
  • Current address : Ömer Altında¼g: Bilecik ¸Seyh Edebali University, Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Statistics, Bilecik, Turkey.
  • E-mail address : omer.altindag@bilecik.edu.tr, omeraltindag87@gmail.com
  • Current address : Mehmet Niyazi Çankaya: U¸sak University, Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Statistics, U¸sak, Turkey.
  • E-mail address : mehmet.cankaya@usak.edu.tr, mehmetncankaya@gmail.com
  • Current address : Abdullah Yalçınkaya: Ankara University, Faculty of Science, Department of Statistics, Ankara, Turkey.
  • E-mail address : ayalcinkaya@ankara.edu.tr
  • Current address : Halil Aydo¼gdu: Ankara University, Faculty of Science, Department of Sta- tistics, Ankara, Turkey.
  • E-mail address : aydogdu@ankara.edu.tr
Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A1 Mathematics and Statistics-Cover
  • ISSN: 1303-5991
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1948
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

E.rukiye DAĞALP, İhsan KARABULUT, Fikri ÖZTÜRK

Some Cesàro-type summability spaces defined by a modulus function of order (α;β)

Hacer ŞENGÜL

P. IPEK, B. YILMAZ, İ. ISMAILOV Z.

Erdoğan ŞEN, Azad BAYRAMOV

On pullback and induced crossed modules of R-algebroids

Osman AVCIOĞLU, İbrahim İlker AKÇA

Hakan SIMSEK, Mustafa ÖZDEMIR

İsmail AYDIN

Arzu AKGÜL

PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCES OF IMPLICITLY AND EXPLICITLY ROBUST CLASSIFIERS ON

Necla GÜNDÜZ, Ernest FOKOU´E

Ö. ALTINDAĞ, N. ÇANKAYA M., A. YALÇINKAYA, H. AYDOĞDU