___

• Abdullah, F., & Jalal, A. (2023). Semantic segmentation based crowd tracking and anomaly detection via neuro-fuzzy classifier in smart surveillance system. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48(2), 2173–2190. [CrossRef]
• Allmer, T. (2012). Critical internet surveillance studies and economic surveillance. Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and social media, 16, 124–143.
• Anamur, D. D., & Topsakal, T. (2019). Herkesin herkesi gözetlediği toplum: Siberuzamda alttan gözetimin farklı inşası olarak Siber zorbalık. İnönü Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi (İNİF E-Dergi), 4(2), 37–58.
• Badenhoop, E. (2021). The fallacy of perfect regulatory controls: Lessons from database surveillance of migration in West Germany from the 1950s to the 1970s. Regulation and Governance, 15(3), 952–968. [CrossRef]
• Christensen, J. R., Hansen, J. C., Larsen, F. H., & Nielsen, J. S. (2015). From Snapshot to Snapchat: Panopticon or Synopticon? (ss. 69–84). Academic Quarter|Akademisk Kvarter. Ciccognani, M. (2023). Exploring modes of surveillance in films. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 10(1), 89–123. [CrossRef]
• Couch, D., Thomas, S. L., Lewis, S., Blood, R. W., & Komesaroff, P. (2015). Obese adults’ perceptions of news reporting on obesity: The panopticon and synopticon at work. SAGE Open, 5(4), 1–14. [CrossRef]
• Dolgun, U. (2004). Gözetim toplumunun yükselişi: Enformasyon toplumundan gözetim toplumuna. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 55–74.
• Doyle, A. (2011). Revisiting the synopticon: Reconsidering Mathiesen’s ‘The Viewer Society’in the age of Web 2.0. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3), 283–299. [CrossRef]
• Elharrouss, O., Almaadeed, N., & Al-Maadeed, S. (2021) A review of video surveillance systems. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 77, 103116. [CrossRef]
• Elmer, G. (2003). A diagram of panoptic surveillance. New Media and Society, 5(2), 231–247. [CrossRef]
• Galič, M., Timan, T., & Koops, B. J. (2017). Bentham, Deleuze and Beyond: An overview of surveillance theories from the panopticon to participation. Philosophy and Technology, 30(1), 9–37. [CrossRef]
• Ganascia, J. G. (2009). The great catopticon. In 8th International Conference Computer Ethics: Philosophical Enquiry (pp. 252–266).
• Ganascia, J. G. (2010). The generalized sousveillance society. Social Science Information, 49(3), 489–507. [CrossRef]
• Jonsson, K. (2006). The embedded panopticon: Visibility issues of remote diagnostics surveillance. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 18(2), 3.
• Kavut, S. (2022). Sosyal, teknolojik ve psikolojik Boyutlarıyla dijital kimlik. Çizgi Kitabevi.
• Lerch, N. (2014). Sousveillance and its impact on privacy. Faculty of Economics and Business Bachelor of Science, International Business.
• Leth Jespersen, J. L., Albrechtslund, A., Øhrstrøm, P., Hasle., P. F. V., & Albretsen, J. (2007). Surveillance, persuasion, and panopticon. In Y. de Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. J. Fogg (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: Second International Conference on Persuasive Technology, PERSUASIVE 2007: Revised Selected Papers (pp. 109–120). IEEE Computer Society Press. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol.4744/2007.
• Lyon, D. (1992). The new surveillance: Electronic technologies and the maximum security society. Crime, Law and Social Change, 18(1–2), 159–175. [CrossRef]
• Lyon, D. (1998). The World Wide Web of surveillance: The internet and off‐world power‐flows. Information, Communication and Society, 1(1), 91–105. [CrossRef]
• Lyon, D. (2006). synopticon, and scopophilia: Watching and being watched. New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility, 9/11, 35–54.
• Marx, G. T. (1985). The threat of 1984-style techniques. Futurist, 21–26.
• Okmeydan, S. B. (2017). Postmodern kültürde gözetim toplumunundönüşümü: ‘Panoptikon’dan ‘sinoptikon’ ve ‘omniptikon’a. AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri online dergisi, 8(30), 45–69
• Özdemİr, Ş. (2020). Post-panoptikon çağı: Gözetimin dijitalleşmesi ve çevrimiçi kimliğin gizliliği üzerine bir analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(3), 81–108. [CrossRef]
• Ruggieri, S., Bonfanti, R. C., Passanisi, A., Pace, U., & Schimmenti, A. (2021). Electronic surveillance in the couple: The role of self-efficacy and commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106577. [CrossRef]
• Siapera, E. (2016). News media and ethnic minorities. The sage handbook of digital journalism, 35–50.
• Sprague, R. (2007). From Taylorism to the Omnipticon: Expanding employee surveillance beyond the workplace. J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L., 25, 1.
• Sultana, T., & Wahid, K. A. (2019). Choice of application layer protocols for next generation video surveillance using internet of video things. IEEE Access, 7, 41607–41624. [CrossRef]
• Thomsen, F. K. (2019). The concepts of surveillance and sousveillance: A critical analysis. Social Science Information, 58(4), 701–713. [CrossRef]
• Wood, S. (2016). Police body cameras: Emotional mediation and the economies of visuality. Emotions, Technology, and Design, 227–239. [CrossRef]
• Yılmaz, S., & Yengin, D. (2021). Analysis of emotional approach of digital surveillance in film studies. Communication and Technology Congress (pp. 233–244). CTC. [CrossRef]