Radyografik çürük tanısında intraoral filmler ve dört fosfor plaka sisteminin in vitro karşılaştırılması

Amaç: Radyografide çürük tanısının konması bazen kolay olmayabilir. Bu çalışmada aynı şartlar altında değerlendirilen dört adet fosfor plaka sisteminin ve iki film esaslı sistemin çürük tanısındaki yerinin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: İki yüz adet diş beşerli gruplar halinde plastik Lego® bloklara yerleştirildi. Her bir bloktan standart şartlarda dental röntgen apareyi ile radyografik görüntü alındı. Fosfor plakalarla (Dentsply DenOptics®, Dürr Vistascan II®, Soredex Digora FMX®, Soredex Digora Optime®) 60 kV ve 7 mA ışınlamayla görüntü elde edildi. Çürük derinliği on bir gözlemci tarafından değerlendirildi. Histolojik bulguları karşılaştırmak için mikroskobik inceleme yapıldı. Mikroskobik ve radyolojik bulgular arasındaki farklar değerlendirilerek çürük derinliği belirlendi. Bulgular: Çürük tanısında farklı sensörlerin çok az etkisi olduğu görüldü. En büyük farkı DenOptix ve Digora FMX sistemleri gösterdi. Tüm yüzeyler hesaplandığında etkinin istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmadığı bulundu. Sonuç: Dört fosfor plaka sistemi de çürük tanısında kabul edilebilir sonuçlar göstermiştir. Mine çürüğündeki histolojik derinlik radyografik ölçümlerle uyumlu bulunmamıştır.

In vitro comparison of intraoral films and four image plate systems in radiographic caries diagnosis

Objectives: Detecting early caries lesion on a radiograph may be a difficult task. The aim of this study was to compare four image plate and two film-based systems by evaluating the accuracy of caries detection under standard conditions. Methods: Two hundred teeth were attached in groups of five onto plastic Lego®blocks. Radiographs were taken from each block under standard bitewing conditions with an X-ray device. Phosphor plates (Dentsply DenOptics®, Dürr Vistascan II®, Soredex Digora FMX®, Soredex Digora Optime®) were exposed at 60 kV and 7 mA. The caries depths were analyzed by eleven observers and microscopic investigation was used to compare the histological findings. The caries depth was calculated as the difference between microscopic and radiological findings. Results: Data analysis showed a small impact of different sensors on the diagnostic accuracy. The largest differences between microscopic and radiographic caries ratings were found with DenOptix and Digora FMX. When it was calculated over all surfaces no statistical significance was found. Conclusion: The results suggest that the performance of the four storage phosphor image plate systems is acceptable for the detection of caries. The increase in histological depth of enamel caries was not significantly correlated with radiographic measurements.
Keywords:

-,

___

  • Wenzel A. Digital radiography and caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998; 27(1):3-11.
  • Wenzel A. Dental Caries in Oral Radiology. Principles and Interpretation. PM White SC, Editor. 2004, Mosby: St. Louis. p. 294-31.
  • Janhom A, van Ginkel FC, van Amerongen JP, van der Stelt PF. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30(3):166-171.
  • Eberhard J, Hartman B, Lenhard M, Mayer T, Kocher T, Eickholz P. Digital subtraction radiography for monitoring dental demineralization. An in vitro study. Caries Res. 2000; 34(3):219-224.
  • Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Larheim TA. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Caries Res. 2000;34(6):448-453.
  • Eickholz P, Kolb I, Lenhard M, Hassfeld S, Staehle H. Digital radiography of interproximal caries: effect of different filters. Caries Res. 1999;33(3):234-241.
  • Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31(3):170-175.
  • Hintze H. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(2):78-82.
  • Jacobsen JH, Hansen B, Wenzel A, Hintze H. Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesion depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems. Caries Res. 2004;38(1):34-38.
  • Li G, Berkhout WE, Sanderink GC, Martins M, van der Stelt PF. Detection of in vitro proximal caries in storage phosphor plate radiographs scanned with different resolutions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008;37(6):325-329.
  • Wenzel, A. and H. Hintze. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999; 28(3): 182-185.
  • Wenzel, A., Haiter-Neto F., Gotfredsen E. Influence of spatial resolution and bit depth on detection of small caries lesions with digital receptors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(3): 418-422.
  • Akdeniz, B. G., Grondahl H. G., Magnusson B. Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements: comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography. Caries Res. 2006; 40(3): 202-207.
  • Haiter-Neto F, Casanova M. S., Frydenberg M, Wenzel A. Task-specific enhancement filters in storage phosphor images from the Vistascan system for detection of proximal caries lesions of known size. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 107(1): 116-121.
  • Li, G., Berkhout, W. E. Sanderink GC, Martins M, van der Stelt PF. Detection of in vitro proximal caries in storage phosphor plate radiographs scanned with different resolutions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008; 37(6): 325-329.
  • Pontual AA, de Melo DP, de Almeida SM, Bóscolo FN, Haiter Neto F. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39(7): 431-436.
  • Xavier CR, Araujo-Pires AC, Poleti ML, Rubira-Bullen IR, Ferreira O Jr, Capelozza AL. Evaluation of proximal caries in images resulting from different modes of radiographic digitalization. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40(6):338-343.
  • Hintze H, Wenzel A. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31(1):44-49.
  • Wenzel A, Moystad A. Experience of Norwegian general dental practitioners with solid state and storage phosphor detectors. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2001;30(4):203-208.
  • Wenzel A. A review of dentists’ use of digital radiography and caries diagnosis with digital systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35(5):307-314.
  • Yalcinkaya, S., A. Kunzel, Willers R, Thoms M, Becker J. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Durr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006; 101(5): 643-651.