Meltem MAYİL, Gaye KESER, Filiz NAMDAR PEKİNER

4518

Maksillofasiyal bölgedeki anatomik noktaların CBCT görüntüleri

Diş hekimliği radyolojisinde konvansiyonel çekim teknikleri baş ve boyun bölgesinde üç boyutlu kompleks yapıların sadece iki boyutlu görüntülenmesine olanak verir. CBCT, diğer bir ismiyle dental volumetrik tomografi, maksillofasiyal bölgede daha hızlı veri elde edebilmek amacıyla konvansiyonel bilgisayarlı tomografiye (BT) alternatif olarak geliştirilmiştir. CBCT’nin avantajları arasında daha kısa ışınlama süresi, hasta hareketine bağlı olarak oluşan distorsiyonda azalma, multiplanar görüntüleme olanağı ve hastanın maruz kaldığı dozda azalma bulunmaktadır. CBCT klinisyenlerin maksillofasiyal bölgede yer alan anatomik noktaların lokalizasyonun belirlenmesinde ve anatomik yapıların aksiyal, koronal, sagittal düzlemlerde görüntülenmesine olanak sağlar. Bu derlemede maksillofasiyal bölgede yer alan bazı anatomik noktaların CBCT görüntülerinden bahsetmekteyiz.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Anatomik noktalar, CBCT, maksillofasiyal bölge

CBCT images of anatomic landmarks in maxillofacial region

Conventional radiographic techniques in dental radiology allows only 2D images of 3D structures of head and neck region. CBCT is a recent technology, is also named as dental volumetric tomography, which was developed as an alternative to conventional CT using cone beam-shaped X-ray to provide more rapid acquisition of a data set of entire maxillofacial region. CBCT has remarkable advantages such as shorter exposure time, reduced image distortion due to patient movements, decreased patient dose and multiplanar screening. CBCT also allows the clinicians to localize the anatomic structures of the maxillofacial region and these anatomic structures can be visualized in various planes such as axial, coronal and sagittal planes. In this review we mentioned some anatomic structures of the maxillofacial region by using CBCT imaging.
Keywords:

Anatomic landmarks, CBCT, maxillofacial region,

PDF

___

  • Robb R. Dynamic spatial reconstructor: an x-ray video fluoroscopic CT scanner for dynamic volume imaging of moving organs. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1982;1:22-23.
  • Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558-1564.
  • Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am. 2008;52:707-730.
  • Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 1: Physical Principles AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1088-1095.
  • MacDonald-Jankowski DS, Orpe EC. Some current legal issues that may affect oral and maxillofacial radiology. Part 2: digital monitors and cone-beam computed tomography. J Can Dent Assoc. 2007;73:507-511.
  • Valentin J. The 2007 recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1-332.
  • Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, Nair MK, Hildebolt CF, Tyndall D, Shrout M. American Academy of Oral Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:561-562.
  • Razavi T, Palmer RD, Davies J, Wilson R, Palmer PJ. Accuracy of measuring the cortical bone thickness adjacent to dental implants using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;23:718-725.
  • Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O’Neill PN. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Dentistry: What Dental Educators and Learners Should Know. J Dent Educ. 2009;76:1437-1442.
  • Serhal CB, Jacobs R, Flygare L, Quirynen M, Van Steenberghe D. Perioperative validation of localisation of the mental foramen. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2002;31:39-43.
  • Yang J, Cavalcanti MGP, Ruprecht A, Vannier MW. 2-D and 3-D reconstructions of spiral computed tomography in localization of the inferior alveolar canal for dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;87:369-374.
  • Nakagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Ishii H, Mishima A, Ishii H, Asada K, Ishibashi K. Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31:322-326.
  • Ito K, Gomi Y, Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K. Clinical application of a new compact CT system to assess 3-D images for the preoperative treatment planning of implants in the posterior mandible A case report. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:539-542.
  • Kamburoglu K, Kilicx C, Ozen T, Yuksel SP. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by conebeam computed tomography: A cadaveric study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:34-42.
  • Maxillofacial Radiology Cone Beam CT Interactive Learning And Navigation. Avaliable from: http://www.marcilan.com/anatomy/mpr/
  • Green RM. The position of the mental foramen: a comparison between the southern (Hong Kong) Chinese and other ethnic and racial groups. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;63:287-290.
  • Neiva RF, Gapski R, Wang HL. Morphometric analysis of implant- related anatomy in Caucasian skulls. J Periodontol. 2004;75:1061- 1067.
  • Apinhasmit W, Chompoopong S, Methathrathip D, Sansuk R, Phetphunphiphat W. Supraorbital Notch/Foramen, Infraorbital Foramen and Mental Foramen in Thais: anthropometric measurements and surgical relevance. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006;89:675-682.
  • Bavitz JB, Harn SD, Hansen CA, Lang M. An anatomical study of mental neurovascular bundle – implant relationship. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:563-567.
  • Misch CE, Crawford EA. Predictable mandibular nerve location. A clinical zone of safety. Int J Oral Implantol. 1990;7:37-40.
  • Katakami K, Mishima A, Shiozaki K, Shimoda S, Hamada Y, Kobayashi K. Characteristics of accessory mental foramina observed on limited cone-beam computed tomography images. J Endod. 2008;34:1441- 1445.
  • Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, Gotoh K, Ariji E. Accessory mental foramen assessment using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:289-294.
  • Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004;33:291-294.
  • Brooks SL, Brand JW, Gibbs SJ, Hollender L, Lurie AG, Omnell KA, Westesson PL, White SC. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997;83:609-618.
  • Hintze H, Wiese M, Wenzel A. Cone beam and conventional tomography for the detection of morphological temporomandibular joint changes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007; 36:192-197.
  • Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:196-201.
  • Olivier E. The inferior dental canal and its nerve in the adult. Br Dent J. 1928:49;356-358.
  • McDonnell, D, Reza Nouri, M, Todd M.E. The mandibular lingual foramen: a consistent arterial foramen in the middle of the mandible. J Anat. 1994;184:363-369.
  • Kohavi D, Bar-Ziv J. Atypical incisive nerve: clinical report. Implant Dent. 1996;5:281-283.
  • Mardinger O, Chaushu G, Arensburg B, Taicher S, Kaffe I. Anterior loop of the mental canal: an anatomical-radiologic study. Implant Dent. 2000;9:120-125.
  • Makris N, Stamatakis H, Syriopoulos K, Tsiklakis K, Stelt PF. Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2010;21:766-771.
  • Pondé JM, Andrade RN, Vıa JM, Metzger P,Teles AC. Anatomical Variations Of The Frontal Sinus. Int J Morphol. 2008;26:803-808.
  • Pekiner F. Anatomic Variations of Paranasal Sinus on Multidetector Computed Tomography Examinations for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. MÜSBED 2013;3:102-106.
  • Angelopoulos C. Cone Beam Tomographic Imaging Anatomy of the Maxillofacial Region. Dent Clin N Am. 2008;52: 731-752.
  • Gray H. Anatomy of the Human Body. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1918; Bartleby.com, 2000. www.bartleby.com/107/.
  • Nour YA, Al-Madani A, El-Daly A, Gaafar A. Isolated Sphenoid Sinus Patology: Spectrum of Diagnostic and Treatment Modalities. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2008;35:500-508.
  • Kazkayası M, Karadeniz Y, Arıkan OK. Anatomic Variations of the Sphenoid Sinus on Computed Tomography. Rhinology. 2005;43:109- 114.
  • Budu V, Mogoantă CA, Fănuţă B, Bulescu I. The anatomical relations of the sphenoid sinus and their implications in sphenoid endoscopic surgery. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2013; 54:13-16.
  • Saka C, Sonbay D, Akın İ, Şimşek G, Öztürk H. Newly Defined Sphenoid Variation That Can Cause Surgical Insufficiency: Sphenoseptal Cell (Sphenoseptal Cell). J Clin Anal Med. 2012;3:18-20.
  • Dwivedi AND, Singha KK. CT Of The Paranasal Sinuses: Normal Anatomy, Varıants And Pathology. Journal of Optoelectronics and Biomedical Materials. 2010;4:28-289.
  • Zinreich XJ. Imaging of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Curr Opin Radiol. 1992;4: 112-116.
  • Abrahams JJ, Hayt MW, Rock R. Sinus lift procedure of the maxilla in patients with inadequate bone for dental implants: radiographic appearance. Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174:1289-1292.
  • Lokanayaki V. Anatomic Variations Of Infra Orbital Foramen. Journal of Surgery. 2013;2:30-36.
  • Covington DS, Wainwright DJ, Teichgrarber JF. Changing patter in epidemiology and treatment of zygoma fractures, 10 year review. J Trauma. 1994;27:243-247.
  • Jansma J, Bos RR, Vissink A. Zygomatic fractures. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd. 1997;104:436-439.
  • Wahab N, Mehdi H, Khan M. Causes of Zygomatic bone fracture reported at Mayo Hospital, Lahore. J Pak Dent Assoc. 2008;17:31-34.
  • Lee KH, Antoun J. Zygomatic fractures presenting to a tertiary trauma centre, 1996-2006. N Z Dent J. 2009;105:4-7.
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: Marmara Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Obezitede bilişsel fonksiyon bozukluğu ve beslenme ilişkisi: Güncel bakış

Sedanur MACİT, Makbule GEZMEN KARADAĞ

Üniversite öğrencilerinin ruhsal durumları ile sağlık davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesi

Nesrin İLHAN, Serap BAHADIRLI, Nadire ERCAN TOPTANER

Maksillofasiyal bölgedeki anatomik noktaların CBCT görüntüleri

Meltem MAYİL, Gaye KESER, Filiz NAMDAR PEKİNER