___

• Ayol A., Filibeli A., Sir D., Kuzyaka E. (2007). Aerobic and anaerobic bioprocessing of activated sludge: Floc disintegration by enzymes. Proceedings of IWA Specialist Conference on Facing Sludge Diversities: Challenges, Risks, and Opportunities, 755-764, Antalya.
• Ayol, A. (2005.a). Enzymatic treatment effects on dewaterability of anaerobically digested biosolids-I: Performance evaluations, Process Biochemistry, 40, 7, 2427–2434.
• Ayol, A., Dentel, S.K., (2005). Enzymatic treatment effects on dewaterability of anaerobically digested biosolids-II: Filterability and Drainability Simulations, Process Biochemistry, 40, 7, 2435–2442.
• Ayol, A., (2005b). Arıtma çamurlarının su verme özelliklerinin geliştirilmesinde yeni bir uygulama: enzimlerle arıtma proje önerisi, TÜBİTAK 104Y375 Nolu proje 1. Gelişme Raporu.
• Bailey, J.E. ve Ollis, D.F., (1986). Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals, 2nd edition, McGraw Hill.
• Barjenbruch M., Kopplow O., (2003). Enzymatic, mechanical and thermal pre-treatment of surplus sludge, Advances in Environmental Research, 7, 715–720.
• Baudez J.C., Ginisty P., Peuchot C., Spinosa L. (2007). The preparation of synthetic sludge for lab testing. Proceedings of IWA Specialist Conference on Facing Sludge Diversities: Challenges, Risks, and Opportunities, 469-477, Antalya.
• Chu C.P., Chu C.P., Chang B.V., Liao G.S., Jean D.S., Lee D.J. (2001). Observation on changes in ultrasonically treated waste-activated sludge. Water Research, 35, 4, 1038–46.
• Dursun, D., Ayol, A., Dentel, S.K., (2004).Physical characteristics of a waste activated sludge: Conditioning responses and correlations with a synthetic surrogate, Water Science and Technology, 50, 9, 129-136.
• Dursun D., Dentel S.K. (2007). The importance of structural and gel fractions in determining shear sensitivity of sludge. Proceedings of IWA Specialist Conference on Facing Sludge Diversities: Challenges, Risks, and Opportunities, 721-730, Antalya.
• Dursun D., Dentel S.K. (2005). Sludge as a gel like material. I. Ulusal Arıtma Çamurları Sempozyumu-AÇS2005 Bildiriler Kitabı, 77-86, İzmir .
• Report of the Commission on Enzymes of the International Union of Biochemistry. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1961.
• Enzyme Nomenclature. Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. New York: Academic Press; 1992.
• Goodwin JAS, Forster CF. (1985). A further examination into the composition of activated sludge surfaces in relation to their settlement characteristics, Water Research, 19, 4, 527–33.
• Houghton, J.I. and Stephenson, T. (2002). Effect of influent organic content on digested sludge extracellular polymer content and dewaterability. Water Research, 36, 3620-3628.
• Jain, S., Lala, A.K., Bhatia, S.K., and Kudchadker, A.P., (1992) Modeling of hydrolysis controlled anaerobic digestion, J Chem Tech Biotechnol, 53, 337-344.
• La Cour Jansen, J., Davidsson, A., Dey, E. S., Norrlöw, O. (2004). Enzyme-assisted sludge minimization, In Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment VIII, Gothenburg Symposium, 345-353, Orlando, FL, United States.
• Li D-H, Ganczarczyk J. (1990). Structure of activated sludge flocs, Biotechnol Bioeng 35, 1, 57–65.
• Liu Y., Tay J.H. (2001). Strategy for minimization of excess sludge production from the activated sludge process, Biotechnol. Adv., 19, 2, 97–107.
• Mikkelsen, L.H. (1999). A physical chemical approach to the floc strength concept-with dewatering implications, Ph.D. Dissertation, Aalborg University, Denmark.
• Mikkelsen LH, Keiding K. (2002). Physicochemical characteristics of full scale sewage sludges with implications to dewatering, Water Research, 36, 2451–2462.
• Müller, J. A. (2000). Disintegration as a key-step in sewage sludge treatment, Water Science Technology, 41, 8, 123–130.
• Muller J.A, Winter A., Strünkmann G. (2004). Investigation and assessment of sludge pretreatment processe, Water Science and Technology, 49, 10, 97-104.
• Novak JT, Sadler ME, Murthy SN. (2003) Mechanisms of floc destruction during anaerobic and aerobic digestion and the effect on conditioning and dewatering of biosolids, Water Research, 37, 3136–44.
• Ormeci, B., Vesilind P.A. (2000). Development of an improved synthetic sludge: A possible surrogate for studying activated sludge dewatering characteristics, Water Research, 34, 1069-1078.
• Poxon, T.L. (1996). Structure and dewaterability in anaerobically digested sludge. In Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation WEFTEC, Residuals and Biosolid Management Collection Systems, Dallas, Texas, 2, 167-178.
• Sanin F.D., Vesilind P.A. (1996). Synthetic sludge: A physical/chemical model in understanding bioflocculation, Water Environment Research, 68, 927-933.
• Sarkar, J., Shah, J., Ramesh, M., (2003). Method of dewatering sludge using enzymes, US- Patent Application.
• Speece RE., (1996). Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewater. Nashville Tennessee, USA: Archae Press.
• Thomas, L., Jungschaffer, G., ve Sprossler, B. (1993). Improved sludge dewatering by enzymatic treatment, Water Science and Technology, 28, 1, 189-192.
• Wawrzynczyk, J., Dey, E. S., Norrlöw, O., Jansen, J. l. C. (2003). Alternative method for sludge reduction using commercial enzymes, In 8th CIWEM/Aqua Enviro European Biosolids and Organic Residuals Conference (P. Lowe and J. A. Hudson, eds.), 1-5. Aqua Enviro Technology Transfer, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, UK.
• Wei Y., Van Houten R.T., Borger A.R., Eikelboom D.H., Fan Y. (2003). Minimization of excess sludge production for biological wastewater treatment, Water Research, 37, 4453–4467.
• Whiteley C.G., Lee D.J. (2006). Enzyme technology and biological remediation, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 38, 291–316.
• Whiteley, C.G., Burgess, J.E., Melamane, X., Pletschke B., Rose P.D., (2003). The enzymology of sludge solubilisation utilizing sulphate-reducing systems: the properties of lipases, Water Research, 37, 289–296.