Sağlıklı Yetişkinler için Sedanter Davranış Anketinin Türkçe Kültürel Adaptasyonu ve Güvenirliği

Giriş ve Amaç: Sedanter Davranış Anketi’nin (SDA), 18-64 yaş arası sağlıklı bireylerde Türkçe kültürel adaptasyonunu ve güvenirlik çalışmasını yapmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya 220 (136 kadın, 84 erkek, yaş ort. 30,86±11,01 yıl) sağlıklı gönüllü dahil edildi. Hafta içi (Hİ) ve sonu (HS) olmak üzere toplamda 22 maddeden oluşan SDA’nın Türkçeye adaptasyonu 5 aşamada gerçekleştirildi: 1)İki kişi tarafından İngilizceden Türkçeye çeviri, 2)Ön çevirilerin karşılaştırılması ve düzenlenmesi, 3)Düzenlenen anketin Türkçeden İngilizceye çevrilmesi, 4)Çevirinin orijinal anketle karşılaştırılması, anketlerin harmonizasyonu, 5)Beş kişiye pilot uygulama ile anketin nihai hale getirilmesi. Benzer ölçek olan Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi kısa formu (UFAA-KF) oturma bölümüyle SDA arasında Pearson korelasyon bakılarak, anketin yapısal geçerliliği test edildi. Yedi gün arayla doldurulan SDA’nın güvenirliği, %95 güven aralığında (CI) test-retest ve iç tutarlılık katsayıları (ICC) ile değerlendirildi. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 24.0 kullanıldı. Bulgular: Yapısal geçerlik değerlendirildiğinde SDA-Hİ, HS ve toplam süreler ile UFAA-KF oturma süresi arasındaki korelasyon sırasıyla, r=0,254, p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Sedanter Yaşam, Fiziksel İnaktivite, Sağlık, Güvenirlik, Geçerlik

The Turkish Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire for Healthy Adults

Objective: To adapt the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) to Turkish and investigate its reliability in healthy individuals aged 18-64. Materials and Methods: Two hundred twenty volunteers (136 females, 84 males, mean age 30.86±11.01 years) were included. The adaptation of SBQ containing total 22 items including weekdays (WD) and weekends (WE), was carried out in 5 stages: 1)Translation from English to Turkish, 2)Comparison and editing of pre-translations, 3)Translation of questionnaire from Turkish to English, 4)Comparison of the translation with the original questionnaire, harmonization of questionnaires, 5)Finalization of the questionnaire with pilot application for five people. The construct validity was tested with Pearson correlation between SBQ and International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) sitting section. The SBQ data collected twice in 7 days interval for reliability at 95% confidence interval (CI) with test-retest and internal consistency coefficient (ICC). SPSS 24.0 was used for analysis. Results: The Pearson correlations between SBQ-WD, WE, total time and IPAQ-SF sitting time were, respectively, r=0.254, p

Keywords:

Sedentary life, physical inactivity, health, reliability, validity,

PDF

___

Owen, N, Healy, G.N, Matthews, C.E, Dunstan, D.W, Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior, Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 2010, 38(3), 105-13.
Holtermann, A, Schellewald, V, Mathiassen, S.E, Gupta, N, Pinder, A, Punakallio, A, et al., A practical guidance for assessments of sedentary behavior at work: A PEROSH initiative, Applied ergonomics, 2017, 63, 41-52.
Schmid, D, Ricci, C, Leitzmann, M.F, Associations of objectively assessed physical activity and sedentary time with all-cause mortality in US adults: the NHANES study, PLoS One, 2015, 10(3), e0119591.
Wijndaele, K, Brage, S, Besson, H, Khaw, K.T, Sharp, S.J, Luben, R, et al., Television viewing time independently predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: the EPIC Norfolk study, nternational journal of epidemiology, 2011, 40(1), 150-9.
von Rosen, P., Dohrn, I. M., Hagströmer, M., Association between physical activity and all-cause mortality: A 15-year follow-up using a compositional data analysis, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2020, 30(1): p. 100-107.
Chau, J.Y, Grunseit, A.C, Chey, T, Stamatakis, E, Brown, W.J, Matthews, C.E, et al., Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis, PLoS One, 2013, 8(11), e80000.
Nowak, P.F, Bożek, A, Blukacz, M, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Quality of Life among University Students, BioMed research international, 2019, 9791281.
Bozkuş, T, Türkmen, M, Kul, M, Özkan, A, Öz, Ü, Cengiz, C, Beden eğitimi ve spor yüksekokulu’nda öğrenim gören öğrencilerin fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri ile sağlikli yaşam biçimi davranişlarinin belirlenmesi ve ilişkilendirilmesi, International Journal of Sport Culture and Science, 2013, 1(3), 49-65.
Zengin Alpözgen, A, Özdinçler, A, Fiziksel aktivite ve koruyucu etkileri: Derleme, Sağlık Bilimleri ve Meslekleri Dergisi, 2016, 3(1), 66-72.
Singh, R, Pattisapu, A, Emery, M.S, US Physical Activity Guidelines: Current state, impact and future directions, Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2020, 30(7), 407-412.
Prince, S.A, Cardilli, L, Reed, J.L, Saunders, T.J, Kite, C, Douillette, K, et al., A comparison of self-reported and device measured sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2020, 17(1), 31.
Dowd, K.P, Szeklicki, R, Minetto, M.A, Murphy, M.H, Polito, A, Ghigo, E, et al., A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2018, 15(1), 15.
Saglam, M, Arikan, H, Savci, S, Inal-Ince, D, Bosnak-Guclu, M, Karabulut, E, Tokgozoglu, L, International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version, Perceptual and motor skills, 2010, 111(1), 278-284.
Kaya Noğay, A.E, Özen, M, Birinci Basamak İçin Fiziksel Aktivite Anketinin Türkçe Uyarlamasının Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği, Konuralp Tıp Dergisi, 2019, 11(1), 1-8.
Karaca, A, Demirci, N, Validity and Reliability of the Adolescent Sedentary Activity Questionnaire (ASAQ) in Adolescents Aged Between 11 and 14, Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, 2019, 54(4), 255-266.
Rosenberg, D.E, Norman, G.J, Wagner, N, Patrick, K, Calfas, K, J, Sallis, J.F, Reliability and validity of the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) for adults, Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2010, 7(6), 697-705.
Tavşancıl, E, Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi, Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara, 2002.
Alaca, N, Frenchay Aktiviteler İndeksinin Türkçe Versiyonunun Psikometrik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirmesi ile Kültürel Adaptasyonu. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, 2020, 10(4), 556-564.
Munguia-Izquierdo, D, Segura-Jimenez, V, Camiletti-Moirón, D, Alvarez-Gallardo, I.C, Estévez-López, F, Romero, A, Delgado-Fernandez, M, Spanish adaptation and psychometric properties of the Sedentary Behaviour Questionnaire for fibromyalgia patients: the al-Andalus study, Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 2013, 31(6 Suppl 79), S22-33.
Beaton, D.E, Bombardier, C, Guillemin, F, Ferraz, M.B, Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures, Spine, 2000 25(24), 3186-3191.
Kiliç, S, Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, 6(1), 47.
Busschaert, C, De Bourdeaudhuij, I, Van Holle, V, Chastin, S.F, Cardon, G, De Cocker, K, Reliability and validity of three questionnaires measuring context-specific sedentary behaviour and associated correlates in adolescents, adults and older adults, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2015, 12, 117.
Bakker, E.A, Hartman, Y.A, Hopman, M.T, Hopkins, N.D, Graves, L.E, Dunstan, D.W, et al., Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2020, 17(1), 1-31.
Karakoç, F.Y, Dönmez, L, Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında temel ilkeler, Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 2014, 13(40), 39-49.
Bakar, Y, Tugral, A, Ozel, A, Altuntas, Y.D, Yakut, Y, Reliability and Validity of Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire in Turkish Population: Evaluation of Psychometric Properties, Middle East Journal of Rehabilitation and Health, 2018, 5(2), e63576.
Prince, S.A, LeBlanc, A.G, Colley, R., Saunders, T.J, Measurement of sedentary behaviour in population health surveys: a review and recommendations, PeerJ Life & Environment, 2017, 5, e4130.