___

• Skervin, A, Levy, B, Management of common surgical complications, Surgery (United Kingdom), 2020, 38, 128–132.
• Ali, A, Plettenburg, D.H, Breedveld, P, Steerable Catheters in Cardiology: Classifying Steerability and Assessing Future Challenges, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2016, 63, 679–693.
• Speir, E.J, Newsome, J.M, Bercu, Z.L, Miller, M.J, Martin, J.G, Correlation of CT Angiography and 99mTechnetium-Labeled Red Blood Cell Scintigraphy to Catheter Angiography for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Single-Institution Experience, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2019, 30, 1725-1732.e7.
• Yarmohammadi, H, Shenoy, C, Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging before catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Much more than left atrial and pulmonary venous anatomy, International Journal of Cardiology, 2015, 179, 461–464.
• Hautmann, H, Schneider, A, Pinkau, T, Peltz, F, Feussner, H, Electromagnetic catheter navigation during bronchoscopy: Validation of a novel method by conventional fluoroscopy, CHEST Journal, 2005,128, 382–387.
• Michalski, D, Tabor, Z, Zieliński, B, Determining the shift of a bronchoscope catheter from the analysis of a video sequence of a bronchoscope video camera, Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 2017, 37, 630–636.
• Abbott, J.E, Heinemann, A, Badalament, R, Davalos, J.G, A clever technique for placement of a urinary catheter over a wire, Urology. Annua, 2015, 7, 367–370.
• Deng, R. Di et al., A novel double-balloon catheter for percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty under echocardiographic guidance only, Journal of Cardiology, 2020.
• Mt. Laurel, NJ. Care and Management of Patients with Urinary Catheters: A Clinical Resource Guide, The Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nurses Society, 2016.
• Igawa, Y, Wyndaele, J.J, Nishizawa, O, Catheterization: Possible complications and their prevention and treatment, International Journal of Urology, 2008, 15, 481–485.
• Kornbau, C, Lee, K, Hughes, G, Firstenberg, M, Central line complications, International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science, 2015, 5, 170.
• Biffi, R. et al., Best choice of central venous insertion site for the prevention of catheter-related complications in adult patients who need cancer therapy: A randomized trial, Annals of Oncology, 2009, 20, 935–940.
• Levy, I., Gralnek, I.M, Complications of diagnostic colonoscopy, upper endoscopy, and enteroscopy, Best Practice & Research: Clinical Gastroenterology Special Issues, 2016, 30, 705–718.
• Sheng, K. X. et al., Comparative efficacy and safety of lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related complications including infectious and bleeding events in adult haemodialysis patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2020, 26, 545–552.
• Zhang, Z, Wang, X, Liu, J, Dai, C, Sun, Y, Robotic Micromanipulation: Fundamentals and Applications, Annual Reviews in Control Autonomic Systems, 2019, 2, 181–203 (2019).
• Shauer, A. et al., Clinical research: Remote magnetic navigation vs. Manually controlled catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: A retrospective study, Europace, 2018, 20, ii28–ii32.
• Kataria, V, Berte, B, Vandekerckhove, Y, Tavernier, R, Duytschaever, M, Remote Magnetic versus Manual Navigation for Radiofrequency Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Long-Term, Controlled Data in a Large Cohort, BioMed Research International, 2017.
• Cao, Q. et al., Recent advances in manipulation of micro- and nano-objects with magnetic fields at small scales, Material Horizons, 2020, 7, 638–666.
• de Arcos, J. et al,. Prospective Clinical Implementation of a Novel Magnetic Resonance Tracking Device for Real-Time Brachytherapy Catheter Positioning, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 2017, 99, 618–626.
• Alemzadeh, H, Raman, J, Leveson, N, Kalbarczyk, Z, Iyer, R.K, Adverse events in robotic surgery: A retrospective study of 14 years of the data, PLoS One, 2016, 11, 1–20.
• Muller, L, Saeed, M, Wilson, M.W, Hetts, S.W, Remote control catheter navigation: Options for guidance under MRI, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2012, 14, 1–9.
• Rafii-Tari, H, Payne, C.J, Yang, G.Z, Current and emerging robot-assisted endovascular catheterization technologies: A review, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2014, 42, 697–715.
• Kim, N, Lee, S, Lee, W, Jang, G, Development of a magnetic catheter with rotating multi-magnets to achieve unclogging motions with enhanced steering capability, AIP Advances, 2018, 8.
• Spilezewski, K.L, Anderson, J. M, Schaap, R.N, Solomon, D.D, In vivo biocompatibility of catheter materials, Biomaterials, 1988, 9, 253–256.
• Ali, A, Plettenburg, D.H, Breedveld, P, Steerable Catheters in Cardiology: Classifying Steerability and Assessing Future Challenges, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2016, 63, 679–693.
• Ahmadi, M, Zhang, Y, Rajamani, R, Timm, G, Sezen, A.S, A Super-Capacitive Pressure Sensor for a Urethral Catheter, Annual International Conferences of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2018, 3453–3455.
• Hu, X, Chen, A, Luo, Y, Zhang, C, Zhang, E, Steerable catheters for minimally invasive surgery: a review and future directions, Computer Assisted Surgery, 2018, 23, 21–41.
• Aagaard, P, Natale, A, Di Biase, L, Robotic navigation for catheter ablation: Benefits and challenges, Expert Review of Medical Device, 2015, 12, 457–469.
• Ullah, W. et al., Comparison of Robotic and Manual Persistent AF Ablation Using Catheter Contact Force Sensing: An International Multicenter Registry Study, PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiolog, 2014, 37, 1427–1435.
• Beaulieu, L. et al., Real-time electromagnetic tracking–based treatment platform for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: Clinical workflows and end-to-end validation, Brachytherapy, 2018, 17, 103–110.
• Nguyen, P. B. et al,. Real-time microrobot posture recognition via biplane X-ray imaging system for external electromagnetic actuation, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2018,13, 1843–1852.
• Jaselskė, E, Adlienė, D, Rudžianskas, V, Urbonavičius, B.G, Inčiūra, A, In vivo dose verification method in catheter based high dose rate brachytherapy, Physica Medica, 2017, 44, 1–10.
• Paul, S, Munavvar, M, Flexible bronchoscopy, Medical (United Kingdom), 2020, 48, 257–262.
• Murgu, S.D, Robotic assisted-bronchoscopy: Technical tips and lessons learned from the initial experience with sampling peripheral lung lesions, BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 2019, 19, 1–8.
• Miyagaki, H. et al., Performance comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized controlled trial, Clinical Nutrition, 2012, 31, 48–52.
• Lee, S.E, Lin, F.Y, Lu, Y, Chang, H.J, Min, J.K, Rationale and design of the Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization: Relation to Cardiovascular Outcomes, Cost Effectiveness and Quality of Life (CONSERVE) trial, American Heart Journal, 2017, 186, 48–55.
• Bharat, S, et al., Electromagnetic tracking for catheter reconstruction in ultrasound-guided high-dose-rate brachytherapy of the prostate, Brachytherapy, 2014, 13, 640–650.
• Cochennec, F, Riga, C, Hamady, M, Cheshire, N, Bicknell, C, Improved catheter navigation with 3D electromagnetic guidance, Journal of Endovascular Therapy, 2013, 20, 39–47.
• Hermann, E.J, Capelle, H.H, Tschan, C.A, Krauss, J.K, Electromagnetic-guided neuronavigation for safe placement of intraventricular catheters in pediatric neurosurgery: Clinical article, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics, 2012, 10, 327–333.
• O’Donoghue, K. et al., Catheter position tracking system using planar magnetics and closed loop current control, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2014, 50.
• Jaeger, H.A. et al., Automated Catheter Navigation With Electromagnetic Image Guidance, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2017, 64, 1972–1979.
• Mukherjee, S, Chacey, M, Diagnostic Yield of Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy Using a Curved-tip Catheter to Aid in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Lesions, Journal of Medical Devices, Transactions of the ASME, 2017, 24, 35–39.
• Bauernfeind, T. et al, The magnetic navigation system allows safety and high efficacy for ablation of arrhythmias, Europace, 2011, 13, 1015–1021.
• Le, V.N.T, Nguyen, N.H, Alameh, K, Weerasooriya, R, Pratten, P, Accurate modeling and positioning of a magnetically controlled catheter tip, Medical Physics, 2016, 43, 650–663.
• Liu, T, Poirot, N.L, Greigarn, T, Çavuşoğlu, M.C, Design of a magnetic resonance imaging guided magnetically actuated steerable catheter, Journal of Medical Devices ASME, 2017, 11.
• De Lambert, A, et al. Electromagnetic tracking for registration and navigation in endovascular aneurysm repair: A phantom study, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2012, 43, 684–689.
• Fitan, E, Messine, F, Nogarède, B, The electromagnetic actuator design problem: A general and rational approach, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2004, 40, 1579–1590.
• Antico, M. et al., Ultrasound guidance in minimally invasive robotic procedures, Medical Image Analysis, 2019, 54, 149–167.
• Di Biase, L. et al., Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation: Single-center experience, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2009, 20, 1328–1335.
• Hlivák, P. et al., Robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Midterm efficacy and predictors of postablation arrhythmia recurrences, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2011, 22, 534–540.
• Rafii-Tari, H, et al., Reducing contact forces in the arch and supra-aortic vessels using the Magellan robot, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2016, 64, 1422–1432.
• De Ruiter, Q.M.B, Moll, F.L, Van Herwaarden, J.A, Current state in tracking and robotic navigation systems for application in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2015, 61, 256–264.
• Schmidt, B. et al., Remote navigation systems in electrophysiology, Europace, 2008, 10 Suppl 3.
• Carpi, F, Pappone, C, Stereotaxis Niobe® magnetic navigation system for endocardial catheter ablation and gastrointestinal capsule endoscopy, Expert Review of Medical Devices, 2009, 6, 487–498.
• Newswire, E.A, New Option for Catheter Guidance Control and Imaging : Interview with Jose L . Merino , MD , PhD, 2011, 11, 1–2.
• Gianni, C, Natale, A, Horton, R.P, Remote Catheter Navigation Systems, Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias Elsevier Inc., 2019, doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-52992-1.00008-9
• Moya, À. et al., Innovations in Heart Rhythm Disturbances: Cardiac Electrophysiology, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing, Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 2013, (English Ed. 66, 116–123.
• Gang, E.S. et al., Dynamically shaped magnetic fields: Initial animal validation of a new remote electrophysiology catheter guidance and control system, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2011, 4, 770–777.
• Phocus, A, Electromagnetic Steering of Interventional Instruments, 2015, 41, 1–22.
• Liu, J. et al., Design and Fabrication of a Catheter Magnetic Navigation System for Cardiac Arrhythmias, IEEE Transaction Applied Superconductivity, 2016, 26.