The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions

Öz The European Union has put forward a vision under the EU Green Deal’s name to take the lead in its priorities, fulfill the Agreement’s criteria, and subsequently accept the first EU climate law on March 5, 2020. The law framework aims to impose tax obligations on consumption goods imported by the EU from abroad, especially on energy-intensive sectors, by applying the carbon border adjustment mechanism. Our main goal is to determine what kind of measures can be taken to ensure that the iron and steel industry is least affected by the EU border carbon regulation. We are an absolute exporter, are least affected by the EU carbon border adjustment. For this reason, the change in energy-related greenhouse gas emissions from the iron and steel industry from 1998 to 2018 was analyzed using the LMDI model to investigate the potential effects of carbon border adjustment in the iron and steel industry. The analyzes were made with five significant factors that determine the change of emissions. These factors are; changes in economic activity, activity mix, energy intensity, energy mix, and emission factors. Analysis has suggested that the economic activity effect has raised CO2 emissions. This method indicates that the energy intensity’s impact could be the first key determinant of GHG emissions. Turkey should attempt to implement low-carbon development policies and reduce energy-related emissions in the iron & steel sector are the least impacted by the EU’s carbon border adjustment.

Kaynakça

1 IPCC. “Proposed outline of the special report in 2018 on the impacts of global warming of 1 . 5 ° C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways , in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate cha”. IPCC - Sr15 2, 17–20, 2018.

2 European Commission, Speech by President von der Leyen in the Plenary of the European Parliament at the debate on the European Green Deal https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/ detail/ en/speech_19_6751/(accessed at 21.02.2021).

3 European Commission, EU Green Deal (carbon border adjustment mechanism) https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12228-Carbon-Border-Adjustment-Mechanism/(accessed at 21.02.2021).

4. Claeys, G., Tagliapietra, S. and Zachmann, G. (2019) How to make the European Green Deal work”, Bruegel Policy Contribution.

5. TURKSTAT (2020) Turkish Greenhouse gas inventory report 1990–2018. Ankara: TURKSTAT. Available at: https://unfccc.int/documents/223580.

6. SteelData is the largest online steel statistics bank of Turkey http://www.steel-data.com/ (accessed at 31.10.2020)

7. Zhang, M. et al. (2013) “Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from electricity generation in China,” Energy Policy, 52, pp. 159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.013

8. Song, Y., Huang, J. B. and Feng, C. (2018) “Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emissions in China’s iron and steel industry: A comprehensive decomposition framework,” Resources Policy. Elsevier Ltd, 59(March), pp. 103–116. doi:

9. Tian, Y., Zhu, Q. and Geng, Y. (2013) “An analysis of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions in the Chinese iron and steel industry,” Energy Policy, 56, pp. 352–361. doi:

10. Hatzigeorgiou, E., Polatidis, H. and Haralambopoulos, D. (2008) “CO 2 emissions in Greece for 1990-2002: A decomposition analysis and comparison of results using the Arithmetic Mean Divisia Index and Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index techniques,” energy, 33(3), pp. 492–499. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.09.014.

11. Paul, S. and Bhattacharya, R. N. (2004) “CO2 emission from energy use in India: A decomposition analysis,” Energy Policy, 32(5), pp. 585–593. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00311-7.

12. Khan, A., Jamil, F. and Khan, N. H. (2019) “Decomposition analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan,” SN Applied Sciences. Springer International Publishing, 1(9), pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1007/s42452-019-1017-z.

13. Emodi, N. V. and Boo, K. J. (2015) “Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from electricity generation in Nigeria,” International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(2), pp. 565–573.

14. Cansino, J. M., Sánchez-Braza, A. and Rodríguez-Arévalo, M. L. (2015) “Driving forces of Spain’s CO2 emissions: A LMDI decomposition approach,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier, 48, pp. 749–759. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.011.

15. González, D. and Martínez, M. (2012) “Decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions in the Mexican industrial sector,” Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(2), pp. 204–215. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2012.01.005.

16. Sumabat, A. K. et al. (2016) “Decomposition analysis of Philippine CO2 emissions from fuel combustion and electricity generation,” Applied Energy, 164, pp. 795–804. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.023.

17. Akbostanci, E., Tunç, G. I. and Türüt-Aşik, S. (2011) “CO2 emissions of Turkish manufacturing industry: A decomposition analysis,” Applied Energy, 88(6), pp. 2273–2278. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.076.

18. Lise, W. (2006) “Decomposition of CO 2 emissions over 1980-2003 in Turkey,” Energy Policy, 34(14), pp. 1841–1852. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.021.

19. Akbostancı, E., Tunç, G. İ. and Türüt-Aşık, S. (2018) “Drivers of fuel based carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Turkey,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81(July 2017), pp. 2599–2608. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.066.

20. Ipek Tunç, G., Türüt-Aşik, S. and Akbostanci, E. (2009) “A decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from energy use: Turkish case,” Energy Policy, 37(11), pp. 4689–4699. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.019

21. Rüstemoğlu, H. (2016) “Environmental costs of economic growth : Determinants of CO2 emissions in Turkey and Iran,” pp. 2151–2168Shao, S. et al. (2016) “Using an extended LMDI model to explore techno-economic drivers of energy-related industrial CO2 emission changes: A case study for Shanghai (China),” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier, 55, pp. 516–536. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.081.

22. Shao, S. et al. (2016) “Using an extended LMDI model to explore techno-economic drivers of energy-related industrial CO2 emission changes: A case study for Shanghai (China),” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier, 55, pp. 516–536. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.081.Ediger, V. Ş. and Huvaz, O. (2006) “Examining the sectoral energy use in Turkish economy (1980-2000) with the help of decomposition analysis,” Energy Conversion and Management, 47(6), pp. 732–745. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.05.022.

23. Ediger, V. Ş. and Huvaz, O. (2006) “Examining the sectoral energy use in Turkish economy (1980-2000) with the help of decomposition analysis,” Energy Conversion and Management, 47(6), pp. 732–745. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.05.022.

24. Sun, W. qiang et al. (2011) “Change in Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions From Energy Use in China’s Iron and Steel Industry,” Journal of Iron and Steel Research International. Elsevier, 18(6), pp. 31–36. doi: 10.1016/S1006-706X(11)60074-5.

25. Hasanbeigi, A., Jiang, Z. and Price, L. (2014) “Retrospective and prospective analysis of the trends of energy use in Chinese iron and steel industry,” Journal of Cleaner Production. Elsevier Ltd, 74(2014), pp. 105–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.065.

26. Wang, X. et al. (2020) “Factor decomposition and decoupling analysis of air pollutant emissions in China’s iron and steel industry,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(13), pp. 15267–15277. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07997-w.

27. Ang, B. W. (2004) “Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method?,” Energy Policy. Elsevier BV, 32(9), pp. 1131–1139. doi: 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00076-4.

28. Du, G. et al. (2018) “A decomposition analysis of energy-related CO2 emissions in Chinese six high-energy intensive industries,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, pp. 1102–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.304.

29. Wang, C., Chen, J. and Zou, J. (2005b) “Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission in China: 1957-2000,” energy. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.04.002.

30. Lin, B. and Tan, R. (2017) “Sustainable development of China’s energy intensive industries: From the aspect of carbon dioxide emissions reduction,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier Ltd, 77(February), pp. 386–394. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.042.

Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { cbayarfbe823265, journal = {Celal Bayar University Journal of Science}, issn = {1305-130X}, eissn = {1305-1385}, address = {}, publisher = {Celal Bayar Üniversitesi}, year = {2020}, volume = {17}, pages = {17 - 29}, doi = {10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265}, title = {The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions}, key = {cite}, author = {Bektaş, Abdulkadir} }
APA Bektaş, A . (2020). The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions . Celal Bayar University Journal of Science , 17 (1) , 17-29 . DOI: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265
MLA Bektaş, A . "The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions" . Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 17 (2020 ): 17-29 <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/cbayarfbe/issue/60937/823265>
Chicago Bektaş, A . "The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions". Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 17 (2020 ): 17-29
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions AU - Abdulkadir Bektaş Y1 - 2020 PY - 2020 N1 - doi: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265 DO - 10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265 T2 - Celal Bayar University Journal of Science JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 17 EP - 29 VL - 17 IS - 1 SN - 1305-130X-1305-1385 M3 - doi: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265 UR - https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265 Y2 - 2021 ER -
EndNote %0 Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions %A Abdulkadir Bektaş %T The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions %D 2020 %J Celal Bayar University Journal of Science %P 1305-130X-1305-1385 %V 17 %N 1 %R doi: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265 %U 10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265
ISNAD Bektaş, Abdulkadir . "The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions". Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 17 / 1 (Aralık 2020): 17-29 . https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265
AMA Bektaş A . The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions. Celal Bayar Univ J Sci. 2020; 17(1): 17-29.
Vancouver Bektaş A . The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science. 2020; 17(1): 17-29.
IEEE A. Bektaş , "The Impact of European Green Deal on Turkey's Iron and Steel Industry: Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Sectoral Emissions", Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, c. 17, sayı. 1, ss. 17-29, Ara. 2021, doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.823265