Container Traffic Prediction in a Seaport Stockyard Implementing Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm Compared with the Genetic Algorithm

Container Traffic Prediction in a Seaport Stockyard Implementing Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm Compared with the Genetic Algorithm

After finishing the construction stage of a container terminal, it is very difficult to modify the current port configuration and properties. For this instance, to avoid of the sunk costs, it is crucial for the seaport designers to predict the container traffic at any stage of the design phase. One of the important facilities of a seaport is the container stockyard in which the containers are held for handling operations. The preliminary design of this facility directly influenced by the container traffic and the probable container amount at the stock area. Hence, the required size of the stock area is determined and the further construction costs are directly related with this design parameter. This study proposed a forecasting model for obtaining the daily value of the containers in the stockyard. The proposed model is a simple regressed model with the past records of container traffic in the storage area. The model results showed that, artificial bee colony algorithm successfully predicted the model coefficients even better than genetic algorithm. The results indicated that the model performance is sufficient for predicting the contain amount in a seaport considering the observed records.

___

  • [1] Noritake, M.; Kimura, S. Optimum Number and Capacity of Seaport Berths Journal of Waterway. Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering. 1983; 109, 323-339.
  • [2] Marasini, R.; Dawood, N. Simulation Modeling and Optimization of Stockyard Layouts for Precast Concrete Products. Proc. Winter Simul. 2002;12,102-105.
  • [3] Corts, P.; Muuzuri, J.; Nicoles, I.; Guadix, J. Simulation of Freight Traffic in the Seville Inland Port. Simul.Model. Pract. Theory. 2007; 15, 256-271.
  • [4] Lengz, N.; Zhihong, J. Optimization of Continuous Berth and Quay Crane Allocation Problem in Seaport Container Terminal; 2nd Int.Conference on Intelligent Computing Technology and Automation. 2009; 3, 229-233.
  • [5] Arango, C.; Cortés, P.; Muñuzuri, J.; Onieva, L. Berth Allocation Planning in Seville Inland Port by Simulation and Optimisation, Adv. Eng. Informatics. 2011; 25, 3, 452-461.
  • [6] Vianen, T.; Ottjes, J; Lodewijks, G. Simulation Based Determination of the Required Stockyard Size for Dry Bulk Terminals. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory. 2014; 42,119-128.
  • [7] Chen, S.H; Chen, J.N. Forecasting Container Throughputs at Ports Using Genetic Programming. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010; 37, 2054-2058.
  • [8] Karaboga, D.; Basturk, B. Artificial Bee Colony Optimization Algorithm for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems. LNAI. 2007; 3, 789-798.
  • [9] Akoglu, K. Optimization of Container Port Storage Area by Genetic Algorithm. Celal Bayar University.2006 (Master's Thesis).
  • [10] Anon. World Fact Book.The World Fact Book : Turkey. 2015.Available:https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/theworld-factbook/geos/tu.html.
  • [11] Anon. Turkish Exporters Assembly. Economy and Foreign Trade Report. 2014. http://www.tim.org.tr/ (195 pages, 17th July 2015)
  • [12] Anon. Book Your Port, Book Your Transfer." [Online]. Available: http://www.bookyourtransfer.com/photos/turkey (17th Juky 2015)
  • [13] Whitley, D. A. Genetic Algorithm Tutorial. Stat. Comput. 1994; 4, 65-85.
  • [14] Umit, G; Yildirim, M.S; Akoglu, K. Prediction of the Container Traffic in a Seaport Stockyard Using Genetic Algorithm. Int. J. Eng. Appl. Sci.2015;7,3-7.