An Approach For Determination Of Risky Buildings And Building Energy Performance Concerning Urban Renewal In Turkey

In May 2012 “Urban Renewal Law” for reducing the expected seismic risk for existing buildings was published. Depending on this law, existing old buildings should have stability tests for the decision; if it should be demolished or strengthened. This article is mainly concentrating on the earthquake stability and energy performance of a case building regarding the physical and environmental dimensions of urban renewal. Case building is a deficient structure that couldn’t catch the static regulations and so demolished. Regarding the urban renewal process a new building was constructed following the energy performance regulations. In this framework structural and energy performance analysis of the existing deficient building are done to present the conditions first. Then the energy performance of the new building is analysed to be compared with the demolished building. For the static analysis of the existing building ideCAD, for the energy performance analysis BEP-TR 2 programs are used. As a result of this study, the structural performance of the case building is examined to display the need of a new construction and then the development of the energy performance is presented by the comparison in between demolished and new buildings.

Keywords:

Urban Renewal Building Energy Performance, Building Structural Analysis,

PDF

___

1. Couch, C., (1990) Urban Renewal: Theory and Practice, Macmillan
2. Aslam, A.B. (2009). Introduction to Urban Renewal and Conservation: Definitions, Concepts, Policies/Approaches. Pakistan: University of Engineering and Technology, Department of City and Regional Planning, Lecture Notes.
3. Tekeli,İ. , 2003. Kentleri Dönüşüm Mekanı Olarak Düşünmek, KentselDönüşümSempozyumu (11-13 Haziran 2003), TMMOB ŞehirPlancıları Odası İstanbulŞubesiYayını, ISBN: 975-395-602-9,İstanbul, s: 2-7.
4. Onkar, P., Dhote, K.K., Sharma, A. “EXPLORING THE CONCEPT OF URBAN RENEWAL IN THE INDIAN CONTEXT”, ITPI JOURNAL 5 : 2 (2008) 42 – 46
5. KALAĞAN, G., ÇİFTÇİ, S. (2012). Public-Private Sector Cooperation in Urban Space Reflections: Urban Transformation Example and New Actors, Journal of Social and Humanities, Volume 4, No 2, 2012 ISSN:1309-8012.
6. IPKB (2014a), Afete Dirençli Şehir Planlama ve Yapılaşma,
https://istanbul.afad.gov.tr/upload/Node/9562/files/ADSPY.pdf.
7. CINA, M. M., (2016) A Critical Analysis of Urban Regeneration Projects in Turkey: Displacement of Romani Settlement Case.. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences.
8. IPKB (2014b), Kentsel Risklerin Azaltılması, ISMEP Proje Rehber Kitapları. URL: https://istanbul.afad.gov.tr/upload/Node/9562/files/KENTSEL+1.pdf.
9. Roberts P.W., & Sykes, H. (2000). Urban Regeneration. A Handbook. London. SAGE. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219980
10. İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi (2006). 1/25000 Ölçekli İzmir Kentsel Bölge Nazım İmar Plan Revizyonu (IKBNIPR) Raporu. İzmir.
11. Bal, Ö.H. (2008). İzmir’de Kentsel Dönüşüm Sürecinin İzmir Cennetçeşme Mahallesi Üzerinden İrdelenmesi. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü,Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
12. Kösten, Y. Ö., (2016) Kentsel Dönüşümün Tek Alternatifi mi var? YIK-YAP, Mimarlık Journal, Number:387.
13. (PDF) Urban Renewal Activities in Turkey: The Trabzon Experience. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269079148_Urban_Renewal_Activities_in_Turkey_The_Trabzon_Experience [accessed Jul 18 2020].
14. KILIÇ, S., KARATAŞ, N., The Role of the Urban Renewal Projects on the Reshaping of the Cities: İzmir (Turkey) Case, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Architectural and Environmental Engineering Vol:9, No:3, 2015,