___

• Alexander, Larry ve Frederick Schauer. “Rules of Recognition, Constitutional Controversies, and The Dizzying Dependence of Law on Acceptance”, The Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution, Matthew D. Adler ve Kenneth Einer Himma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), s. 175-192.
• Alexy, Robert, The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism, çev. Bonnie Litschewski Paulson ve Stanley L. Paulson (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).
• Bindreiter, Uta, Why Grundnorm? A Treatise on the Implications of Kelsen’s Doctrine (The Hauge: Kluwer Law International, 2002).
• Gözler, Kemal, Anayasa Hukukunun Genel Esaslar›, Üçüncü Ek Bask› (Bursa: Ekin Yay›nlar›, 2010).
• Gözler, Kemal, Türk Anayasa Hukuku Dersleri, Dokuzuncu Bask› (Bursa: Ekin Yay›nlar›, 2010).
• Himma, Kenneth Einer, “Understanding the Relationship between the U.S. Constitution and the Conventional Rule of Recognition”, Rule of Recognition and the U.S. Constitution”, derleyenler: Matthew D. Adler ve Kenneth Einer Himma (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), s.
• Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law ikinci Bask› (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).
• Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State, (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2006).
• Kelsen, Hans, “On the Basic Norm”, California Law Review, 47 (1959), s. 107-110.
• Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967).
• Kelsen, Hans, What is Justice? (New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, 2000).
• Raz, Joseph, “Kelsen’s Theory of the Basic Norm”, (s. 122-145), The Authority of Law, ‹kinci Bask› (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).
• Schauer, Frederick, “Amending the Presupposition”, Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment, derleyen Sanford Levinson (Princeton: Princeton University Pres, 1995), s. 145-161.
• Shapiro, Scott J., Legality (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2011).