Protez Enfeksiyonları Konulu Bilimsel Çıktıların Analizi

Tıp alanındaki gelişmelerle beraber, eklem protezi uygulamaları artmıştır. Aynı zamanda protez eklem enfeksiyonu gibi komplikasyonların sıklığı da artmıştır. Bu hastalık konusunda yayınlanmış bilimsel literatürün incelenmesi çalışmanın amacı idi. Çalışmada bibliyometrik yöntem kullanılarak, Scopus veri tabanı araştırıldı. Arama çubuğu kısmında, başlık bölümünde İngilizce dilinde " Prosthetic" ve "joint" ve "infection " veya " Periprosthetic" ve "infection" kelimeleri kullanılarak, ilgili veri tabanındaki yayınlara ulaşıldı. Sonrasında sadece tıp konu alanında yayınlanmış yayınlar ile analiz yapılması planlandığından seçim daraltıldı. Yayınlar, yazarları, yayın yıllları, konuları, atıf sayıları, yayınlandıkları dergiler, yapıldıkları kurumlar ve çalışmaların finansal destek sağlayıcıları açısından değerlendirildi. Protez eklem enfeksiyonu konusunda 3007 yayın saptandı. İlk yayın 1969 yılında Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nden (ABD) John R Charnley tarafından yayınlanmıştı. Yayın sayısının özellikle son on yılda artış eğiliminde olduğu görüldü. 2011-2021 tarihleri arasında tüm yayınların %85,36’sı yayınlanmıştı. En üretken ülke ABD (n=1098, 36,5%) idi. ABD’den Javad Parvizi 202 yayın ile çalışmamız konusundaki en üretken yazardı. ABD’den Rothman Institute 246 yayının yayınlandığı en üretken kurumdu. Journal of Arthroplasty (n=340) ve Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (n=168), dergileri protez eklem enfeksiyonu konusunda en fazla makale yayınlamış olan dergilerdi. Sonuç olarak, protez eklem enfeksiyonu global önemi artan bir konudur. Gelişmekte olan ülkelerin de bu alandaki yayınlarını arttırmaları gerekmektedir. Bu alanın finansal olarak da gelişmekte olan ülkelerde desteklenmesi gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Protez eklem enfeksiyonu, Periprostetik enfeksiyon, Bilimsel yayın

Analysis of Scientific Outputs on Prosthetic Infections

With the developments in the field of medicine, joint prosthesis applications have increased. At the same time, the frequency of complications such as prosthetic joint infection has increased. The aim of the study was to examine the scientific literature published on this disease. In the study, the Scopus database was searched using the bibliometric method. In the search bar section, the publications in the relevant database were reached by using the words " Prosthetic" and "joint" and "infection" or "Periprosthetic" and "infection" in English in the title section. Since it was planned to analyze only the publications published in the field of medicine, the selection was narrowed. The publications were evaluated in terms of authors, publication years, subjects, citations, journals in which they were published, institutions in which they were published, and financial support providers of the studies. 3007 publications were found on prosthetic joint infection. The first publication was in 1969 by John R Charnley from the United States. It has been observed that the number of publications has tended to increase especially in the last ten years. Between 2011 and 2021, 85.36% of all publications were published. The most productive country was the USA (n=1098, 36.5%). Javad Parvizi from the USA was the most prolific author on our work with 202 publications. The Rothman Institute from the USA was the most productive institution with 246 publications published. In conclusion, prosthetic joint infection is an issue of increasing global importance. Developing countries also need to increase their publications in this area. This area needs to be supported financially in developing countries as well.

Keywords:

Prosthetic joint infection, Periprosthetic infection, Scientific publication,

PDF

___

Alkan Çeviker S, Yılmaz M, Uyar C, Dindar Demiray EK. 2021. Bibliometric analysis of scientific research on Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Turkey. D J Med Sci, 7(2): 97-102.
AlRyalat SAS, Malkawi LW, Momani SM. 2019. Comparing bibliometric analysis using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. J Visual Experim, 152: e58494.
Akyüz HÖ, Alkan S, Gökçe ON. 2022. Overview on pressure ulcers studies based on bibliometric methods. Iberoam J Med, 4(1): 18-23. DOI: 10.53986/ibjm.2022.0004.
Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ, Crook DW, Simpson H, Peto TE. 1998. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J Clin Microbiol, 36(10): 2932-2939.
Bar-Ilan J. 2010. Citations to the introduction to infometrics indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 82(3): 495-506.
Beam E, Osmon D. 2018. Prosthetic Joint Infection Update. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 32(4): 843-859.
Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Duffy MC, Steckelberg JM, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. 1998. Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: case-control study. Clin Infect Dis, 27(5): 1247-1254.
Cinpolat HY. 2022. A bibliometric analysis of global research trends on biomarker studies in Alzheimer’s disease. D J Med Sci, 8(1): 5-10.
Charnley J, Eftekhar N. 1969. Postoperative infection in total prosthetic replacement arthroplasty of the hip-joint. With special reference to the bacterial content of the air of the operating room. British J Surg, 56(9): 641-649.
Del Pozo JL, Patel R. 2009. Clinical practice. Infection associated with prosthetic joints. N Engl J Med, 361(8): 787-794.
Dindar Demiray EK, Oğuz Mızrakçı S, Alkan S. 2021. Analysis of publications on Acinetobacter: A Scopus database search study. J Clin Med Kaz, 18(5): 44-48. DOI: 10.23950/jcmk/11226.
Ekici A, Alkan S, Aydemir S, Gurbuz E, Unlu AH. 2022. Trends in Naegleria fowleri global research: A bibliometric analysis study. Acta Tropica, 234: 106603. DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106603.
Gökçe ON, Alkan S. 2022. Contribution of Turkey in liver transplant research: A Scopus Database Ssearch. Exp Clin Transplantat, DOI: 10.6002/ect.2021.0491.
Gürler M, Alkan S, Can Ö, Aydın B. 2021. Collaborative network analysis and bibliometric analysis of publications on diabetic foot ınfection. J Biotechnol Strat Health Res, 5(3): 194-199.
Kandemir Ö. 2014. Protez eklem enfeksiyonları. ANKEM Derg, 28(Ek 2): 18-26.
Kapadia BH, Berg RA, Daley JA, Fritz J, Bhave A, Mont MA. 2016. Periprosthetic joint infection. Lancet, 387(10016): 386-394. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61798-0.
Khiste GP, Paithankar RR. 2017. Analysis of Bibliometric term in Scopus. Int J Library Sci Inf Manag, 3(3): 81-88.
Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H, Schmier JK, Parvizi J. 2012. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J Arthroplasty, 27(8 Suppl): 61-5.e1.
Küçük U, Alkan S, Uyar C. 2021. Bibliometric analysis of infective endocarditis. Iberoam J Med, 3(4): 350-355. DOI: 10.53986/ibjm.2021.0055.
Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O'Brien PJ. 2011. 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 469(5): 1487-1497.
Mızrakçı S. 2022. Global overview of rotavirus publications. BSJ Health Sci, 5(2): 239-244. DOI: 10.19127/bshealthscience.1078616.
Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM. 2013. Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis, 56(1): e1-e25.
Özlü A. 2022. Bibliometric analysis of publications on pulmonary rehabilitation. BSJ Health Sci, 5(2): 219-225. DOI: 10.19127/bshealthscience.1032380.
Özlü C. 2021. Bibliometric evaluation based on Scopus database: A global analysis of publications on myelodysplastic syndrome and evaluation of publicatıons from Turkey. J Biotechinol Strat Health Res, 5(2): 125-131.
Öztürk G. 2022. Toraks cerrahisi konusundaki yayınların global analizi ve Türkiye'nin katkısı. TOGÜ Sağlık Bil Derg, 2(1): 39-50.
Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ. 2011. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469(11): 2992-2994.
Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. 2013. Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone Joint J, 95-B(11):1450-1452.
Piolanti N, Nesti A, Andreani L, Parchi PD, Cervi V, Castellini I, Marchetti S. 2015. The fifty most cited Italian articles in the orthopaedic literature. Musculoskeletal Surg, 99(2): 105-111. DOI: 10.1007/s12306-015-0352-5.
Porrino J, Wang A, Moats A, Mulcahy H, Kani K. 2020. Prosthetic joint infections: diagnosis, management, and complications of the two-stage replacement arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol, 49(6): 847-859.
Pulido L, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. 2008. Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(7): 1710-1715.
Robinson JC, Pozen A, Tseng S, Bozic KJ. 2012. Variability in costs associated with total hip and knee replacement implants. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American Vol, 94(18): 1693-1698. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00355.
Sun J, Guo Y, Scarlat MM, Lv G, Yang XG, Hu YC. 2018. Bibliometric study of the orthopaedic publications from China. Int Orthopaedics, 42(3): 461-468. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-3828-8.
Şahin S. 2022. Vasküler Cerrahiye Genel Bakış. Şahin S. 2022. Overview on vascular surgery. BSJ Health Sci, 5(3): 365-369. DOI: 10.19127/bshealthscience.1076552.
Tande AJ, Patel R. 2014. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev, 27(2): 302-345.
Uyar C, Alkan S, Tahmaz A. 2022. Research trends and hotspots of osteoarticular involvement in brucellosis. J Zoonotic Dis, 6(2). DOI: 10.22034/jzd.2022.14656.
Yıldız E. 2022. Bibliometric analysis of publications on pregnancy and anesthesia in Turkey. BSJ Health Sci, 5(1): 50-55. DOI: 10.19127/bshealthscience.996582.
Zardi EM, Franceschi F. 2020. Prosthetic joint infection. A relevant public health issue. J Infect Pub Health, 13(12): 1888-1891. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.09.006.
Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. 2004. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med, 351(16):1645-1654.