Mathematical Modelling of CO2 corrosion with NORSOK M 506

Mathematical Modelling of CO2 corrosion with NORSOK M 506

The consequences of corrosion is catastrophic also costs reached the global economy “$2.5 trillion, or world GDP’s 3.4%”. Despite the magnitude of the corrosion cost, it can be concluded that scientific studies on corrosion prevention are quite limited, with the exception of high-risk sectors such as aviation and the fuel oil industry. It is important to fight against corrosion in order to ensure the safe operation of oil-carrying pipelines under the sea; and to prevent accidents and environmental damage. As a result of developing industry conditions and increasing needs, modelling corrosion is a very effective method in the prevention of corrosion. Industry, research companies and universities have developed many corrosion rates, prediction models. One of them is the NORSOK M 506 model. In this study, the NORSOK M 506 CO2 corrosion prediction model and the experimental results conducted by Nešić, Solvi and Enerhaug in 1995 were compared in terms of CO2 corrosion rate. The results showed that the mathematical corrosion model calculated nearly six times higher than the experimental study within conformity.

___

  • [1] Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of Pipeline Safety, “Pipeline Integrity Management in High Consequence Areas (Gas Transmission Pipelines)” Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, PHMSA Integrity Management Program. Under Delivery Order, DTRS56-02-D-70036. [Online]. Available: https://www.phmsa.dot.gov. [Accessed: Apr. 20, 2018].
  • [2] Analysis, Research and Information on Accidents, Accident report number 5611, 163, 30934, 32675. Analysis, Research and Information on Accidents ARIA database. [Online]. Available: https://www.aria.developpement-durable.gouv.fr. [Accessed: Apr. 20, 2018].
  • [3] C.R.F. Azevedo, “Failure Analysis of the crude oil pipeline.” Engineering Failure Analysis., vol.14, 2007, pp. 978–994.
  • [4] National Association of Corrosion Engineers, “International Measures of Prevention, Application, and Economics of Corrosion Technologies (IMPACT)”, The National Association of Corrosion Engineers NACE. [Online]. Available: http://impact.nace.org/documents. [Accessed: Apr. 22, 2018].
  • [5] International Monetary Fund, “World Economic Outlook Database”, International Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook IMF WEO. [Online]. Available: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications. [Accessed: Apr. 12, 2022].
  • [6] JRC - MAHB, “Corrosion-Related Accidents in Petroleum Refineries: Lessons Learned from Accidents in EU and OECD Countries” The JRC's Major Accident Hazards Bureau. Luxembourg European Commission Public Office, 2013, pp. 2-3. [7] Environmental Science for European Refining, “European downstream oil industry safety performance Statistical summary of reported incidents – 2018” Environmental Science for European Refining, CONCAWE Prepared for the Concawe Safety Management Group by: C. Banner (Science Executive, Safety Management Group, Concawe) C. Davidson (Anything Hosted Ltd.). [Online]. Available: https://www.concawe.eu. [Accessed: May. 10, 2022].
  • [8] H. H. Uglig, Uhlig's Corrosion Handbook. 3rd ed., review R.W. Revie, New York, Wiley, 2001.
  • [9] M.B. Kermani, D. Harrop, “The impact of corrosion on Oil and Gas Industry.” SPE Production Facilities, vol.11, pp 186–190, 1996.
  • [10] S. Nesić, J. Postlethwaite, and M. Vrhovac, “CO2 Corrosion of Carbon Steel - from Mechanistic to Empirical Modelling”, Journal of Corrosion Reviews, vol. 15, pp. 211-240, 1997.
  • [11] S. Nešić, G.T. Solvi and J. Enerhaug, “Comparison of the rotating cylinder and pipe flow tests for flow sensitive carbon dioxide corrosion” Journal of Corrosion, vol.51 (10), pp.773–786, 1995.
  • [12] S. Nešić, A. Kahyarian and Y. S. Choi, “Implementation of a Comprehensive Mechanistic Prediction Model of Mild Steel Corrosion in Multiphase Oil and Gas Pipelines.” Journal of Corrosion, vol. 75 (3), pp. 274-291, December 2018.
  • [13] NORSOK (2005). CO2 Corrosion Rate Calculation Model. 2nd revision.