___

• 1. Akkurt, I., Akyıldırım, H. Mavi, B. Kilincarslan, S. Basyigit, C. 2010. Photon attenuation coefficients of concrete includes barite in different rate. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 37: 910–914.
• 2. Erdem, M., Baykara, O., Doğru, M., Kuluöztürk, F. 2010. A novel shielding material prepared from solid waste containing lead for gamma ray. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 79, 917–922.
• 3. Demir, N., Akar Tarim, U., Gurler, O. 2017. Application of FLUKA code to gamma-ray attenuation, energy deposition and dose calculations. International Journal of Radiation Research, 15(1): 123-128.
• 4. Medhat, M.E., Demir, N., Tarim Akar, U., Gurler, O. 2014. Calculation of gamma-ray mass attenuation coefficients of some Egyptian soil samples using Monte Carlo methods. Radiation Effects & Defects in Solids, Vol. 169, No. 8: 706–714.
• 5. Ozyurt, O., Altinsoy, N., Karaaslan, Ş.İ., Bora, A., Buyuk, B., Erk, İ. 2018. Calculation of gamma ray attenuation coefficients of some granite samples using a Monte Carlo simulation code. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 144: 271–275.
• 6. Tekin, H.O. 2016. MCNP-X Monte Carlo Code Application for Mass Attenuation Coefficients of Concrete at Different Energies by Modeling 3 × 3 Inch NaI(Tl) Detector and Comparison with XCOM and Monte Carlo Data. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 7 pages.
• 7. Tekin, H.O., Singh, V. P., Manici, T., Altunsoy, E. E. 2017. Validation of MCNPX with Experimental Results of Mass Attenuation Coefficients for Cement, Gypsum and Mixture. Journal of Radiation Protection and Research, 42(3): 154-157.
• 8. Sidhu G. S, Singh K., Singh P. S., Mudahar G. S. 1999. Effect of collimator size and absorber thickness on gamma ray attenuation measurements for bakelite and perspex. Pramana – J. Phys., Vol. 53, No. 5.
• 9. Ladhaf B. M., Pawar P. P.. 2016. Effect of Absorber Concentration and Collimator Size on Gamma Ray Attenuation Measurements. International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research ISSN 2394 – 3386 Vol. 3, Issue 3 March 2016.
• 10. Çelik N., Özen S.A., Demirtas Ö.F., Çevik U. 2018. The effect of energy resolution of detection instrument on mass attenuation coefficient Journal of Instrumentation, Vol. 13 P10012.
• 11. Çelik N., Çevik U., Çelik A. 2012. Effect of detector collimation on the measured mass attenuation coefficients of some elements for 59.5–661.6 keV gamma-rays. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 281: 8–14.
• 12. Tam, H.D., Yen, N.T.H., Tran, L.B., Chuong, H.D., Thanh, T.T. 2017. Optimization of the Monte Carlo simulation model of NaI(Tl) detector by Geant4 code. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 130, 75–79.
• 13. Ferrari, A., Sala, P.R., Fasso`, A., Ranft, J. 2005. FLUKA: a multi-particle transport code. CERN-2005-10, INFN/TC_05/11, SLAC-R-773.
• 14. Shi, H.-X., Chen, B.-X., Li, T.-Z., Yun, D. 2002. Precise Monte Carlo simulation of gamma-ray response functions for an NaI(Tl) detector. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 57: 517–524.
• 15. Vlachoudis, V. 2009. FLAIR: A Powerful but User Friendly Graphical Interface for FLUKA.Proc. Int. Conf. on Mathematics, Computational Methods & Reactor Physics, Saratoga Springs, New York.
• 16. Akkurt, I., Gunoglu, K., Arda, S.S. 2014. Detection Efficiency of NaI(Tl) Detector in 511–1332 keV Energy Range. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, Vol. 2014, 5 pages.
• 17. M. J. Berger, J. H. Hubbell, NBSIR 87-3597, 1987. Photon cross sections on a personal computer. National Institute of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.