___

• ALA's core competencies of librarianship (2009, 27 Ocak). http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/sites/ala.org. educationcareers/files/content/careers/corecomp/corecompetences/finalcorecompstat09.pdf google scholar
• Alaca, E. (2017). Okuma alışkanlığı kapsamında 3’ü 1 arada enfes karışım (Oyun-Oyuncak-Kitap) sunan kurumlar: Türkiye’de oyuncak kütüphaneleri. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 31(3), 403-417. google scholar
• Albert, A. (2014). Communicating library value. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 40, 634-637. google scholar
• Aldrich, S. (2009). Engaging baby boomers and their offspring as volunteers. APLIS, 22(2), 89-90. google scholar
• Anders, K.C. (2016). Using student volunteers in library orientations. Practical Academic Librarianship: The International Journal of the SLA Academic Division, 6(2), 17-30. google scholar
• Appleton, L. ve Abernethy, P. (2013). We said ... we did!: a partnership approach to developing library and student support services. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 19(2), 208-220. google scholar
• Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4). 216-224. google scholar
• Baber, M. (2018, July 10). The positive and negative impact of using volunteers in public libraries. https:// www.ucl.ac.uk/information-studies/sites/information-studies/files/gbaber2018.pdf google scholar
• Bakırcı, R. (2009). Milli Kütüphane’de görme engellilere sunulan hizmetler ve gelişmeler. Bilgi Dünyası, 10(1), 100-104. google scholar
• Bayraktar, A. (2019). Kütüphane hizmetlerinin tanıtımında sosyal medya etkisi: Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi örneği. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 55(4), 379-387. google scholar
• Bellucci M., Manetti G. & Thorne L. (2018). Stakeholder engagement andsustainability reporting. Routledge. google scholar
• Bernier, M. (2009). Young adult volunteering in public libraries: Managerial implications. Library Leadership & Management, 23(3), 133-139. google scholar
• Berroteran, J. (2016). More meaningful recognition, support and appreciation of volunteers .C. Smallwood ve L. Sanborn (Eds.), Library volunteers welcome!: strategies for attracting, retaining andmaking the most of willing helpers içinde (ss. 158-203 ve 5-55). McFarland & Company. google scholar
• Bhojaraju, G. (2003, April 9-11). Intranet for library services. http://eprints.rclis.org/4818/1/Intranet_for_ Library_Services.pdf google scholar
• Binlerce Taş Plak Dijital Kütüphanede Erişime Açıldı (2021, 10 Aralık). ArtDog Istanbul https://artdogistanbul. com/binlerce-tas-plak-dijital-kutuphanede-erisime-acildi/ google scholar
• Blackburn, F. (2014). An example of community engagement: Libraries act and the act aboriginal and torres strait ıslander communities. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 45(2), 121-138. google scholar
• Bogel, G. (2013) The art of managing volunteers in the school library. SchoolLibraryMonthly, 29(4), 26-28. google scholar
• Bourke, C. (2009). Working with older volunteers: opportunities and potential. APLIS, 22(4), 181-183. google scholar
• Bourne, L. (2009). Stakeholder relationship management: A maturity model for organisational implementation. Routledge. google scholar
• Broady-Preston, J. (2014). Measuring and assessing the impact of using volunteers in UK libraries. Performance Measurement & Metrics, 15(3), 112-121. google scholar
• Brock, A. ve Rankin, C. (2012). Connecting and engaging - reaching your audience and catching the latest wave!. C. Rankin & A. Brock (Eds.), Library services for children andyoungpeople: Challenges and opportunities ın the digital age içinde (ss. 63-156). Facet Publishing. google scholar
• Bryson, J., Patton, M.Q. ve Bowman, R.A. (2011). Working with evaluation stakeholders: A rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 1-12. google scholar
• Bunic, S. (2010). Volunteers in libraries - opportunities and possibilities. Vjesnik bibliotekara Hrvatske, 53(3/4), 115-124. google scholar
• Calman, A. (2010). Are volunteers worth the effort? Maximizing the value of volunteers in the hospital library. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 10(4), 395-401. google scholar
• Carvalho, J. (1984). To complement or compete?. The role of volunteers in public libraries. Public Library Quarterly, 5(1), 35-40. google scholar
• Casselden, B., Pickard, A.J. ve McLeod, J. (2014). The challenges facing public libraries in the Big Society: The role of volunteers, and the issues that surround their use in England. Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 47(3), 187-203. google scholar
• Casselden, B. (2016). A delicate balancing act: An investigation ofvolunteer use andstakeholderperspectives in public libraries [Doktora tezi, Northumbria University]. google scholar
• Casselden, B., Walton, G., Pickard, A. ve Mcleod, J. (2017). Issues of quality and professionalism of library volunteers. Performance Measurement & Metrics, 18(2), 118-126. google scholar
• Casselden, B., Pickard, A., Walton, G. ve McLeod, J. (2019). Keeping the doors open in an age of austerity? Qualitative analysis of stakeholder views on volunteers in public libraries. Journal of Librarianship & Information Science, 51(4), 869-883. google scholar
• Chang, H.R. ve Lee, S.J. (2012). A study on the satisfaction of parent volunteers in school libraries. Journal ofKorean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(1), 183-200. google scholar
• Chawki, A. ve Aitlemqeddem, H. (2020). Stakeholder theory: Literature review of historical development and influence in the strategic management discipline. Revue Internationale des Sciences de Gestion, 6(3/1), 104-130. google scholar
• Colibaba, A., Skinner, M.W. ve Furgal, C. (2019). The Challenges and opportunities of sustaining volunteer-based rural libraries. Public Library Quarterly, 38(4), 410-427. google scholar
• Constantinescu, M., Danciu, A. ve Haimana, D. (2020). Volunteering in libraries: Survey on Romanian public libraries. Romanian Journal of Library and Information Science, 16(2), 12-19. google scholar
• Creaser, C. ve Spezi, V. (2014). Improving perceptions of value to teaching and research staff: The next challenge for academic libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(3), 191-206. google scholar
• Cribb, G., Hanken, T. ve Gottipati, S. (2015, 14 Aralık). Evaluating library spaces while developing a ‘culture of assessment. 11th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services, Edinburgh, July 20-22, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285951085_ Evaluating_Library_Spaces_while_Developing_a_’Culture_of_Assessment_ google scholar
• Cross R.L. Singer J. ve Thomas R.J. (2010). The organizational network fieldbook: Bestpractices techniques and exerci. John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
• Cruz, J.D La. (2016). Teaching technology with volunteers in the library. C. Smallwood & L. Sanborn (Eds.), Library volunteers welcome!: Strategies for attracting, retaining and making the most of willing helpers içinde (ss. 158-203). McFarland & Company. google scholar
• Çakmak, T. ve Eroğlu, Ş. (2016). Belediye kütüphanelerinde dijital teknoloji ve sosyal medya kullanımı. Belediyelerin kütüphane ve arşiv hizmetleri uluslararası sempozyumu bildiriler kitabı içinde (ss. 745753). Nilüfer Belediyesi. google scholar
• Deodato, J. (2014). The patron as producer: Libraries, web 2.0, and participatory culture. Journal of Documentation, 70(5), 734-758. google scholar
• Donaldson, T. ve Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory ofthe corporation. The Academy ofManagement Review, 20(1), 65-91. google scholar
• Driggers, P.F. ve Dumas, E. (2002). Managing library volunteers: A practical toolkit. American Library Association. google scholar
• Emery, F. ve Trist, E. (1965). The casual texture of organizational environments.HumanRelations, 18, 21-32. google scholar
• Ergün, C. (2021a). Kütüphanelerde İtibar Yönetimi: Paydaş Temelli Bir Model Önerisi. Hiperyayın. google scholar
• Ergün, C. (2021b). Kütüphanelerde itibar Yönetimi: Paydaş Temelli Bir Model Önerisi. [Yayınlanmış Doktora tezi], Maltepe Üniversitesi. google scholar
• 4 reasonsproject stakeholder feedback is important. (2020, March 10). https://pm-alliance.com/project-stakeholder-feedback/ google scholar
• Eunson, B. (2007). Communication in the Workplace. Wiley. google scholar
• Farrell, M. (2017). Leadership reflections: advisory bodies. Journal of LibraryAdministration, 57(8), 891-900. google scholar
• Ferguson, D. (2003). Friend or foe? the role of friends of library groups in community development. APLIS, 16(3), 110-114. google scholar
• Fernandez, P. (2016). Through the looking glass: Envisioning new library technologies’ how artificial intelligence will impact libraries. Library Hi TechNews, 33(5), 5-8. google scholar
• Forrest, M. (2012). Student volunteers in academic libraries. New Review of AcademicLibrarianship, 18(1), 1-6. google scholar
• Freeman, R.E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Freeman, R.E. ve Reed, D.L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. CaliforniaManagementReview, 25(3), 88-106. google scholar
• Freeman, R.E. ve Wicks, A.C. ve Harrison, J.S. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. Yale University. google scholar
• Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmar, B.L. ve DeColle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press. google scholar
• Friedman, A.L. and Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal ofManagementStudies, 39(1), 1-21. google scholar
• Geekie, J. 2016. Digital literacy and digital inclusion teachMeets in London and Leeds. Journal of Information Literacy, 10(1), 102-103. google scholar
• Genç yetişkinler için kütüphane hizmetleri rehberi (2014). Muhittin Gürbüz (Çev.) Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 28(3), 402-417. google scholar
• Goldfarb, J., Park, J. ve Strand, M. (2021). The future of librarianship through the present. Young Adult Library Services, 19(4), 27-30. google scholar
• Goulding, A. (2009). Engaging with community engagement: public libraries and citizen involvement. New Library World, 110(1/2), 37-51. google scholar
• Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating ınter-organizational collaboration.HumanRelations, 10, 911-936. google scholar
• Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327. google scholar
• Gupta, K., Crilly, D. ve Greckhamer, T. (2020). Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance. StrategicManagementt Journal, 41, 1869-1900. google scholar
• Guzman, M.R. de (2007, August). Youth Volunteerism. Adolescence & Youth, August. https://extensionpublications. unl.edu/assets/html/g1750/build/g1750.htm#target1 google scholar
• Halk Kütüphaneleri Yönetmeliği (2012, 11 Ocak). https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2012/01/20120111-18. htm google scholar
• Halk Kütüphaneleri Hizmet Esasları (2012, 27 Temmuz). KYGM. http://www.kygm.gov.tr/ Eklenti/4832,khgenelge-17.pdf?0 google scholar
• Harland, F., Stewart, G. ve Bruce, C. (2019). Leading the academic library in strategic engagement with stakeholders. College & Research Libraries, 80(3), 319-339. google scholar
• Hendricks, A. (2019, August 12). Stakeholder engagement - best practice guide. https://simplystakeholders. com/stakeholder-engagement-best-practices/ google scholar
• Hewitt, B. ve Eve, J. (2012). The use of volunteers in local study library projects. Evidence BasedLibrary & Information Practice, 7(1), 41-52. google scholar
• Hewlett, S. (2002). Volunteering in libraries, museums and archives. Cultural Trends, 12(46), 39-66. google scholar
• Hogan, S. ve Conlin, K. (2019). Library student employee expertise: Strategies for maximizing your student employee contributions to the library, Public Services Quarterly, 15(2), 104-115. google scholar
• Hollebeek, L.D., Sprott, D.E., Sigurdsson, V. ve Clark, M.K. (2022). Social influence and stakeholder engagement behavior conformity, compliance, and reactance. Psychology & Marketing, 39(1), 90-100. google scholar
• Holt, L.E. ve Holt, G.E. (2014). Success with library volunteers. Libraries Unlimited. google scholar
• Hughes, H., Bland, D., Willis, J. ve Burns, R.E. (2015). A happy compromise: Collaborative approaches to school library designing. Australian Library Journal, 64(4), 321-334. google scholar
• Hurst, S., Marsh, D., Brown, D. ve Forbes, S. (2017). Cats, comics, and knausgârd: Promoting student reading at a U.K. academic library with a leisure reading collection. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23(4), 442-452. google scholar
• Huvila, I. (2020). Librarians on user participation in five european countries. Canadian Journal of Information & Library Sciences, 43(2), 127-157. google scholar
• Identify Key Stakeholders (2013, April 10). American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/everyday-advocacy/engage/identify-key-stakeholders google scholar
• Irwin, B. ve Silk, K. (2019). Changing stakeholder expectations of library value. Public Library Quarterly, 38(3), 320-330. google scholar
• İleri, A. (2011). Halk Kütüphanelerinde Gönüllülük: “Benim Kütüphanem Projesi'nin Değerlendirilmesi”. [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans tezi], Marmara Üniversitesi. google scholar
• Jang, B.S., Nam, Y.J. ve Lee, J.K. (2014). Research on factors for job satisfaction of library volunteers for the disabled. Journal of Korean Biblia Society, 25(1), 217-237. google scholar
• Jeffery, N. (2009, September 13). Stakeholder engagement: A road map to meaningful engagement. https:// dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/3801 google scholar
• Jiang, Y., Chi, X., Lou, Y., Zuo, L., Chu, Y. ve Zhuge, Q. (2021). Peer reading promotion in university libraries: Based on a simulation study about readers’ opinion seeking in social networks. Information Technology & Libraries, 40(1), 1-17. google scholar
• Johnston, S. (2014, January 23). The synergy of push andpullcommunications. https://www.striata.com/posts/ the-synergy-of-push-and-pull-communications/ google scholar
• Jones, T.M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and econometrics. Academy of ManagementReview, 20, 404-437. google scholar
• Jones, T.M., Harrison, J.S. ve Felps, W. (2018). How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of ManagementReview, 43(3), 371-391. google scholar Jones, T. (2020). Making makerspaces more functional and sustainable. TeacherLibrarian, 48(2), 44-46. google scholar
• Joseph, M. (2006). Active, engaged, valued: older people and public libraries in new south wales. APLIS, 19(3), 113-117. google scholar
• Kamu - STK iş Birliğinde Türkiye’de Gönüllülük Bilincinin Arttırılması Projesi (2021, 2 Temmuz). T.C. Sivil Toplumla İlişkiler Genel Müdürlüğü. https://www.gonulluluk.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/EK3-Gonulluluk-Arastirmasi.pdf google scholar
• Keremidchiev, S. (2021). Theoretical foundations of stakeholder theory. IkonomicheskiIzsledvania, 30 (1), 70-88. google scholar
• Keseroğlu, H.S. (2004). Kütüphane- bilgi belge merkezi kurma, kütüphane programı yazma kılavuzu. Nesil Yayınevi. google scholar
• Knapp, N.F. (2013). Cougar readers: piloting a library-based ıntervention for struggling readers. School Libraries Worldwide, 19(1), 72-90. google scholar
• Köprülü, D. (2006). Halk kütüphanelerinde koleksiyon seçimi. Bilgi Dünyası, 7(1), 77-88. google scholar
• Kütüphane gönüllülüğü eğitim programı (2019, 17-18 Ocak). https://kutuphanedeyim.org/kutuphane-gonullulugu-egitim-programi/ google scholar
• Kütüphanelerde halkla ilişkiler ve gönüllülük eğitimi gerçekleştirildi. (2016, 22 Kasım). BBY Haber, https:// www.bbyhaber.com/bby/2016/11/22/kutuphanelerde-halkla-iliskiler-ve-gonulluluk-egitimi-gerceklestirildi google scholar
• Lankes, R.D. (2011). TheNew Atlas of librarianship. The MIT Press. google scholar
• Lawton, A. (2015). The ınvisible librarian: a librarian’s guide to ıncreasing visibility andımpact. Chandos Publishing. google scholar
• Levine-Clark, M. ve Dean, T.C. (Eds.).(2013). ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science: Vol. Fourth edition. ALA Editions. google scholar
• Masek, L.E. (2003). A picture really is worth a thousand words or how to market the medical library using bulletin boards and posters. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 3(1), 89-92. google scholar
• McDiarmid, M. ve Auster, E.W. (2004). Fewer library staff and more volunteers or vice versa? Staffing in Ontario hospital libraries and volunteer use. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 25(2), 39-43. google scholar
• McDiarmid, M. ve Auster, E. (2005). Using volunteers in Ontario hospital libraries: Views of library managers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 253-262. google scholar
• Melilli, A., Mitola, R. ve Hunsaker, A. (2016). Contributing to the library student employee experience: Perceptions of a student development program. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(4), 430-437. google scholar
• Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., ve Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy ofManagement Review, 22(4), 853886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247. google scholar
• Mitchell, R.K, Lee, J.H. ve Agle, B.R. (2017). Stakeholder prioritization work: The role stakeholder salience in stakeholder research. D.M. Wasieleski & J. Weber.J. (Eds.), Stakeholder Management içinde (ss. 124157). Emerald. google scholar
• Morphy, T. (2014, June 28). Stakeholder analysis, project management, templates and advice. https://www. stakeholdermap.com/stakeholder-engagement.html#account google scholar
• Muller, M. (2021). New York Public Library volunteers. BibliothekForschung UndPraxis, 45(1), 49-53. google scholar
• National digital information infrastructure and preservation program (U.S.) (2002, September 12). Preserving our digital heritage: Plan for the National Digital Information infrastructure and Preservation Program: a collaborative initiative of the Library of Congress. https://www.digitalpreservation.gov/documents/ ndiipp_plan.pdf google scholar
• Neal, J.G. (2010). Advancing from kumbaya to radical collaboration. Journal of Library Administration, 51, 66-76. google scholar
• Nelke, M. (2012). Strategic business development for ınformation centres and libraries. Chandos Publishing. google scholar
• Nelson, R. ve Thoms, B.L. (2021). The practical and the aspirational: Managing the student employee experience in library publishing efforts. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 9(1), 1-20. google scholar
• Netshakhuma, N.S. (2021). Exploration role of volunteerism on the digitisation project: Case of the office of the premier in Mpumalanga province. SouthAfrica. Collection & Curation, 40(1), 15-23. google scholar Nicol, E. ve Johnson, C. (2008). Volunteers in libraries. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(2), 154-163. google scholar
• Oakleaf, M. (2011). Assesment. David R. Lankes (Ed.), The New Atlas of Librarianship içinde (ss.207-208). The MIT Press. google scholar
• Oh, D.G. (2013). Developing LCSI (Library Customer Satisfaction Index) Lite for public library. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and information Science, 47(4), 335-361 google scholar
• Özdemirci, F. (1990). Halk kütüphanelerinin mali kaynaklarını geliştirmenin yolları. Prof.Dr. OsmanErsoy’a Armağan içinde (ss. 108-121). Türk Kütüphaneciler Derneği. google scholar
• Panter, L. ve Kristine T. (2014). Venues for volunteering. Voice of Youth Advocates, 37( 4), 28. google scholar
• Peng, Y.P. ve Chuang, P.H. (2020). A competency model for volunteer storytellers in public libraries. Libri, 70(1), 49-64. google scholar
• Pfeffer, J. ve Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations. Harper & Row. google scholar
• The public library service : IFLA/UNESCO guidelines for development (2001, May 11). https://cdn.ifla.org/ wp-content/uploads/files/assets/hq/publications/archive/the-public-library-service/publ97.pdf google scholar
• Public library stakeholders (2012, February 29). American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/tools/ research/librariesmatter/public-library-stakeholders google scholar
• Raimondo, E. (2022, Jan 11). The importance of both push andpull communications. https://icthrive.com/ blog/importance-of-push-and-pull-communications/ google scholar
• Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910. google scholar
• Sağlamtunç, T. (2010). Görme engelliler ve kütüphanecilik hizmetleri. Bilgi Dünyası, 11 (1), 178-191. google scholar
• School library crisis toolkit (2008, December 3).American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/aasl/ advocacy/tools/toolkits/crisis google scholar
• Shelton, K. (2008). Starting a volunteer program in a community college library. Community & Junior College Libraries, 14(3),161-177. google scholar
• Siew, W.Y.V. (2007). Engaging active citizenry among Singaporeans, young and old, at the Singapore public libraries. Library Management, 28(1/2), 17-26. google scholar
• Son, A. (2020). Engaging teens and staff through summer volunteering. Young Adult Library Services, 18(3), 25-27. google scholar
• Special libraries (2016, July 21). American Library Association. http://www.ala.org/educationcareers/libcareers/ type/special google scholar
• Springer, R. (2020, June 30). Why stakeholder engagement matters more than ever, https://sr.ithaka.org/blog/ why-stakeholder-engagement-matters-more-than-ever/ google scholar
• Stakeholder engagement framework. (2014, August 6). https://natlib.govt.nz/files/strategy/nlnz-stakeholder-engagement-framework.pdf google scholar
• Stine, W.F. (2008). An empirical analysis of the effect of volunteer labor on public library employment. Managerial andDecision Economics, 29(6), 525-538. google scholar
• Sumadevi, S. ve Kumbar, M. (2019). Use of social media to promote library services in the digital age. Use of social media to promote library services in the digital age içinde (ss. 225-238). https://www.researchgate. net/publication/337673976_Use_of_Social_Media_to_Promote_Library_Services_in_the_Digital_Age google scholar
• Sung, Hui-Yun ve Hepworth, M. (2013). Community engagement in public libraries: practical implications. Advances in Librarianship, 37, 31-47. google scholar
• Supporting youth development to become activists for community engagement: Learn the benefits of creating partnerships for school and public libraries (2018). Young Adult Library Services, 16(2), 5-9. google scholar
• Tammaro, A.M. (2016) Participatory approaches and ınnovation in galleries, libraries, archives, and museums. InternationalInformation & Library Review, 48(1), 37-44. google scholar
• Tezcan, F.G. ve Tanrıkulu, Y. (2011). Milli Kütüphane’de görme engellilere yönelik konuşan kitaplık bölümü hizmetinin değerlendirilmesi ve kullanıcı memnuniyeti araştırması. Bilgi Dünyası, 12(2), 359-378. google scholar
• Thompson, S.H. (2009). On being a virtual world librarian: “hello, can ı help?” - managing virtual volunteers. The Reference Librarian, 50(4), 422-427. google scholar
• Türkiye'de gönüllülük (2013, 12 Aralık). Türkiye Üçüncü Sektör Vakfı. https://www.tusev.org.tr/usrfiles/files/ Gonulluluk.pdf google scholar
• Van Heukelem, M. (2021). Rally help for a small archive: Matching student and volunteer needs with collections management priorities. Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 48(2), 1-5. google scholar
• Vivek, S.D., Beatty, S.E. ve Morgan, R.M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 122-146. google scholar
• VolunteeringStatisticsfor2023:How CharitableAre We? (2023, March 14) https://teamstage.io/volunteering-statistics/ google scholar
• Waddock, S.A. ve Bannister, B.D. (1991). Correlates of effectiveness and partner satisfaction in social partnership. Journal of Organizational ChangeManagement, 4(2), 74-89. google scholar
• Waters, R.D. ve Bortree, D.S. (2012). Improving volunteer retention efforts in public library systems: How communication and inclusion impact female and male volunteers differently. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary SectorMarketing, 17(2), 92-107. google scholar
• Wheeler, D. ve Sillanpaa, M. (1997). The Stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximizing stakeholder value. Pitman. google scholar
• Whitaker, S. (2016). Pass thepmp (r) exam - tools, tips and tricks to succeed. APress. google scholar
• Wicks, A.C. ve Harrison, J.S. (2017). Toward a more productive dialogue between stakeholder theory and strategic management. D.M. Wasieleski & J. Weber (Eds.). Stakeholder Management içinde (ss. 249-273). Emerald Publishing. google scholar
• Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. AnnualReview of Sociology, 26, 215-240. google scholar
• Wyly, M. (1992). Uncommon human resources: The Newberry library volunteer program. Library Trends, 41(2), 316-29. google scholar
• Van Heukelem, M. (2021). Rally help for a small archive: Matching student and volunteer needs with collections management priorities. Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 48(2), 1-5. google scholar
• Yanardağ, U. ve Yanardağ, M.Z. (2020). Gönüllü yönetimi. Zuhal Gök Demir ve Mehmet Bayırlı (Ed.). Gençlik ve Gönüllülük Bağlamında SivilAnT içinde (ss. 21-37). Nobel Yayınları. google scholar
• Yılmaz, B. ve Bayır, D. (2004). PULMAN-XT projesi ve Türk kütüphaneciliğine etkileri. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 18(1), 79-84. google scholar
• Yılmaz, B. (2008). Türkiye’de halk kütüphaneleri bölge seminerleri: “iyi uygulama örneği” olarak bir deneyimin değerlendirilmesi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 22(1), 107-128. google scholar
• Yılmaz, B. (2014). Ankara’da halk kütüphanesi sistemi: Niceliksel bir değerlendirme. Ankara Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(2), 115-130. google scholar
• Yücel, H. (2014). Bitlis Kitap Severler Derneği ve Her Okula Bir Kütüphane Projesi. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 28(1), 75-78. google scholar