Russia Out NATO In: Georgia’s Perspective on Regional Peace and Security in the South Caucasus

Georgia is a small country in an insecure region where military es- calation has become a common feature of regional politics. At the same time, it is strategically important for both the West and Russia, which is one of the key causes of instability. The aim of this study is to analyse Georgia’s security perspective on regional security in the South Caucasus, which is suggested to be intertwined with its national security perspective. Insecurity and conflict, according to Georgia’s security perception, lead to increased Russian interference in the region, which itself is one of the causes of the region’s per- sistent instability. Thus, stability in the South Caucasus is one of Georgia’s top priorities in terms of security, which is reflected in Georgia’s National Security Concept (NSC) adopted in 2011, and the 2012 Resolution of Basic Directions of Georgia’s Foreign Policy. Following Georgia’s NSC, this study examines the relationship be- tween Georgia’s security expectations and regional geopolitical re- alities and finds that, although Georgia’s current security perception, based on the 2011 NSC, has met national and regional security needs so far, adaptation of the security policy to new circumstances, where Georgia could serve as a connection between the West and the East rather than choosing between them, is required.

Russia Out NATO In: Georgia’s Perspective on Regional Peace and Security in the South Caucasus

Georgia is a small country in an insecure region where military es- calation has become a common feature of regional politics. At the same time, it is strategically important for both the West and Russia, which is one of the key causes of instability. The aim of this study is to analyse Georgia’s security perspective on regional security in the South Caucasus, which is suggested to be intertwined with its national security perspective. Insecurity and conflict, according to Georgia’s security perception, lead to increased Russian interference in the region, which itself is one of the causes of the region’s per- sistent instability. Thus, stability in the South Caucasus is one of Georgia’s top priorities in terms of security, which is reflected in Georgia’s National Security Concept (NSC) adopted in 2011, and the 2012 Resolution of Basic Directions of Georgia’s Foreign Policy. Following Georgia’s NSC, this study examines the relationship be- tween Georgia’s security expectations and regional geopolitical re- alities and finds that, although Georgia’s current security perception, based on the 2011 NSC, has met national and regional security needs so far, adaptation of the security policy to new circumstances, where Georgia could serve as a connection between the West and the East rather than choosing between them, is required.

___

  • Çelikpala, Mitat and Veliyevi, Cavid (2015), Azerbaijan-Georgia- Turkey: An Example of a Successful Regional Cooperation (No. 4: CIS Policy Brief).
  • Davtyan, Erik (2021), ‘Agency and perceptions of smallness: un- derstanding Georgia’s foreign policy behaviour’, Caucasus Survey.
  • Dyomkin, Denis (21 November 2011), ‘Russia says Georgia war stopped NATO expansion’, Reuters.
  • Kakachia, Kornely , Minesashvili, Salome , and Kakhishvili, Levan (2018), ‘Change and Continuity in the Foreign Policies of Small States: Elite Perceptions and Georgia’s Foreign Policy Towards Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 70 (5), 814-31.
  • Kucera, Joshua (2021), ‘Leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan hold first post-war meeting’, , accessed 05.04.2021
  • Oskanian, Kevork (2013), Fear, Weakness and Power in the Post- Soviet South Caucasus: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Remler, Philip (2020), Russia’s Stony Path in the South Caucasus (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace).
  • Shiriyev, Zaur and Kakachia, Kornely (2013), ‘Azerbaijani- Georigan Relations: The Foundations And Challengesof The Strate- gic Alliance’, SAM Review, 7-8.
  • Tarkhan-Mouravi, Gia (2014), ‘Georgia’s European Aspirations and the Eastern Partnership’, in Stephen F. Jones (ed.), The Making of Modern Georgia, 1918-2012: The First Georgian Republic and Its Successors (London-New York: Routledge).