Roller ve Gerçekler: Türkiye’nin ve Brezilya’nın Afrika ile Bağı

Çin’in kendi kazancını ABD’nin kaybı olarak değerlendiren sıfır toplamlı oyun anlayışı, yükselen güçlerin ikinci ‘Afrika kapışması’ sürecindeki tartışmaları gölgede bırakmıştır. Brezilya ve Türkiye gibi orta güçler de küresel hedefleri olmasına rağmen çok az dikkat çekmişlerdir. Bu makale Türkiye ve Brezilya’nın Afrika ülkelerine yönelik dış politikalarında belirledikleri rolü tanımlamakta ve bu rollerin sahadaki gerçeklikle ne kadar uyuştuğunu analiz etmektedir. Afrika'daki işbirliği ve destek söylemlerinin geçmişte sömürgeci güçler tarafından da benimsenen doğal kaynak odaklı iktisadi çıkarlarla çeliştiğini vurgulayan makale, bölgedeki yanıltıcı ve tarafsız olmayan tarihsel ilişkileri de ortaya koymaktadır.

Roles and Reality: Turkish and Brazilian Engagement with Africa

In the enthusiasm to declare a second ‘scramble for Africa’ by emerging powers, China has dwarfed the debate, fuelled by the zero-sum perception that its gain is the United States’ loss. Although middle powers such as Turkey and Brazil have equally global ambitions, their growing engagement with the continent has received little critical attention. This article identifies the roles that Turkey and Brazil have adopted in their foreign policy towards African countries, and analyses these roles against the realities on the ground. It finds that their discourses of sustained partnership and support are belied by the kinds of resource-hungry economic interests favoured by prior colonial projects, and misleadingly selective histories of affinity that amplify partial connections to a continental scale.

___

  • Abdenur, Adriana. “The Strategic Triad: Form and Content in Brazil’s Trian- gular Cooperation Practices.” In South-South Cooperation in Education and Development, edited by Linda Chisholm and Gita Steiner-Khamsi, 39–59. In- ternational Perspectives on Education Reform. New York : Cape Town, South Africa: Teachers College Press ; HSRC Press, 2009.
  • Abramovici, Pierre. “United States: The New Scramble for Africa.” Review of African Political Economy 31, no. 102 (December 1, 2004): 685–734. doi:10. 1080/0305624042000327822.
  • Alden, Chris, and Marco Antonio Vieira. “The New Diplomacy of the South: South Africa, Brazil, India and Trilateralism.” Third World Quarterly 26, no. 7 (January 1, 2005): 1077–95.
  • Ali, Ahmed. “Turkish Aid in Somalia: The Irresistible Appeal of Boots on the Ground.” The Guardian. Accessed February 18, 2015. http://www.theguard- ian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2013/sep/30/turkey-aid- somalia-aid-effectiveness.
  • Aydın, Ali Kemal. “Speech at the Second Turkey-Africa Partnership Summit.” Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, November 19, 2014. http://afrika.mfa.gov.tr/19- november-2014-speech-by-ambassador-Ali-Kemal-Aydin-deputy-undersec- retary-MFA-Turkey.en.mfa.
  • Bacik, Gokhan, and Isa Afacan. “Turkey Discovers Sub-Saharan Africa: The Critical Role of Agents in the Construction of Turkish Foreign-Policy Dis- course.” Turkish Studies 14, no. 3 (September 1, 2013): 483–502. doi:10.108 0/14683849.2013.832040.
  • Beneš, Vit. “Role Theory: A Conceptual Framework for the Constructivist Foreign Policy Analysis?” Paper prepared for the Third Global International Studies Conference “World Crisis. Revolution or Evolution in the Internation- al Community?”, 17-20 August 2011, University of Porto, Portugal., n.d.
  • Bilgic, Ali, and Daniela Nascimento. Turkey’s New Focus on Africa: Causes and Challenges. NOREF Policy Briefs. Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre (NOREF), September 2014. http://www.isn.ethz.ch/Digital-Library/
  • Publications/Detail/?lng=en&id=183490.
  • Braveboy-Wagner, Jacqueline Anne. The Foreign Policies of the Global South: Rethinking Conceptual Frameworks. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003.
  • Broadman, Harry G. “China and India Go to Africa: New Deals in the Devel- oping World.” Foreign Affairs 87, no. 2 (March 1, 2008): 95–109.
  • Burges, Sean W. “Auto-Estima in Brazil - The Logic of Lula’s South-South Foreign Policy.” International Journal 60 (2005-2004): 1133.
  • Campbell, Horace. “China in Africa: Challenging US Global Hege- mony.” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (February 1, 2008): 89–105. doi:1080/01436590701726517.
  • Carlsson, Jerker. “Brazilian Trade with West Africa and Angola within the Portuguese Colonial Empire, 1500-1950: The Dialectics of South-South
  • Exchange.” In Newly Industrializing Countries and the Political Economy of South-South Relations, edited by Jerker Carlsson and Timothy M. Shaw, 151–83. Macmillan International Political Economy Series. Houndmills, Bas- ingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1988.
  • Carlsson, Jerker. “The Brazilian Penetration of Nigeria through Trade: A Case-Study of South-South Trade Relations, 1965-79.” In Newly Industrial- izing Countries and the Political Economy of South-South Relations, edited by Jerker Carlsson and Timothy M. Shaw, 184–283. Macmillan International
  • Çavuşoğlu, Mevlüt. “Speech at the Second Turkey-Africa Partnership Summit.” Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, November 20, 2014. http://afrika. mfa.gov.tr/20-november-2014-speech-by-HE-mevlut-cavusoglu-minister-of- foreign-affairs-of-turkey.en.mfa.
  • Davutoglu, Ahmet. Stratejik Derinlik / Türkiye’nin Uluslararasi Konumu. 32 edition. Aksaray, İstanbul: Kure Yayinlari, 2009.
  • De Sa e Silva, Michelle Morais. “South-South Cooperation: Past and Present Conceptualization and Practice.” In South-South Cooperation in Education and Development, edited by Linda Chisholm and Gita Steiner-Khamsi, 39– International Perspectives on Education Reform. New York : Cape Town, South Africa: Teachers College Press ; HSRC Press, 2009.
  • Erdoğan, Recep Tayyip. “Speech at the Second Turkey-Africa Partnership Summit.” Malabo, Equatorial Guinea, November 21, 2014. http://afrika.mfa. gov.tr/21-november-2014-speech-by-HE-recep-tayyip-erdogan-the-president- of-the-republic-of-turkey.en.mfa.
  • Fig, David. “The Political Economy of South African Penetration of Bra- zil: The Case of the Anglo American Corporation.” In Newly Industrializing Countries and the Political Economy of South-South Relations, edited by Jerk- er Carlsson and Timothy M. Shaw, 204–31. Macmillan International Political Economy Series. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan, 1988.
  • Guney, Aylin, and Nazif Mandaci. “The Meta-Geography of the Middle East and North Africa in Turkey’s New Geopolitical Imagination.” Security Dia- logue 44, no. 5–6 (October 2013): 431–48. doi:10.1177/0967010613499783.
  • Habiyaremye, Alexis, and Tarik Oguzlu. “Engagement with Africa: Making Sense of Turkey’s Approach in the Context of Growing East-West Rivalry.” Uluslararasi Iliskiler-International Relations 11, no. 41 (SPR 2014): 65–85.
  • Hanrieder, Wolfram F. “Compatibility and Consensus: A Proposal for the Conceptual Linkage of External and Internal Dimensions of Foreign Policy.” American Political Science Review 61, no. 04 (December 1967): 971–82. doi:2307/1953399.
  • Harte, Julia. “Turkey Shocks Africa.” World Policy Journal 29, no. 4 (Decem- ber 2012): 27–38. doi:10.1177/0740277512470926.
  • Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E. Shannon. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15, no. 9 (November 2005).
  • Instituto Lula. “With a New Embassy in Malawi, Brazil Now Has Diplomatic Representation in 38 African Countries,” May 27, 2013. http://eng.institutolu- la.org/?p=393.
  • Kahn, M. J. “The BRICs and South Africa as the Gateway to Africa.” Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 111, no. 7 (July 2011): 493–96.
  • Kimenyi, Mwangi S., and Zenia Lewis. “The BRICS and the New Scramble for Africa.” In Foresight Africa: The Continent’s Greatest Challenges and Opportunities for 2011, 19–21. Brookings Institute: Africa Growth Initiative, 20
  • Kose, Talha. “Turkey’s Power in the Middle East and North Africa: An Assess- ment of the Potential and the Limits of Non-Coercive Power.” Uluslararasi Iliskiler-International Relations 11, no. 41 (SPR 2014): 29–61.
  • Kragelund, Peter. “Back to BASICs? The Rejuvenation of Non-Traditional Donors’ Development Cooperation with Africa.” Development and Change 42, no. 2 (March 1, 2011): 585–607. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01695.x.
  • Kragelund, Peter. “The Return of Non-DAC Donors to Africa: New Prospects for African Development?” Development Policy Review 26, no. 5 (September 1, 2008): 555–84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00423.x.
  • Landman, Todd. Issues and Methods in Comparative Politics: An Introduc- tion. Psychology Press, 2003.
  • Lafer, Celso. “Brazilian International Identity and Foreign Policy: Past, Pres- ent, and Future.” Daedalus 129, no. 2 (April 1, 2000): 207–38.
  • “Lula on His Legacy: An Interview with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva.” The Economist, September 30, 2010. http://www.economist.com/ node/17173762.
  • Malamud, Andrés. “A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy.” Latin American Politics and Society 53, no. 3 (September 1, 2011): 1–24. doi:1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.x.
  • McCormick, Dorothy. “China & India as Africa’s New Donors: The Impact of Aid on Development.” Review of African Political Economy 35, no. 115 (March 1, 2008): 73–92. doi:10.1080/03056240802011501.
  • Mohan, Giles, and Marcus Power. “Africa, China and the ‘new’ Economic Ge- ography of Development.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 30, no. 1 (March 1, 2009): 24–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9493.2008.00352.x.
  • Nuria, Blasco. “Stirring Speech by Former President Lula Da Silva.” Equa- torial Guinea’s Official Government Webpage, January 7, 2011. http://www. guineaecuatorialpress.com/noticia.php?id=1713&lang=en.
  • Özerdem, Alpaslan. “How Turkey Is Emerging as a Development Partner in Africa.” The Guardian. Accessed February 18, 2015. http://www.theguardian. com/global-development-professionals-network/2013/apr/10/turkey-develop- ment-partner-africa.
  • Özkan, Mehmet. “A New Actor or Passer-By? The Political Economy of Tur- key’s Engagement with Africa.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 14, no. 1 (2012): 113–33. doi:10.1080/19448953.2012.656968.
  • Özkan, Mehmet. “Does ‘rising Power’ Mean ‘rising Donor’? Turkey’s Devel- opment Aid in Africa.” Africa Review 5, no. 2 (July 1, 2013): 139–47. doi:10. 1080/09744053.2013.855358.
  • Özkan, Mehmet. “Turkey’s Rising Role in Africa.” Turkish Policy Quarterly Vol. 9 No. 4, no. Winter 2010/2011. Accessed February 18, 2015. http://turk- ishpolicy.com/article/559/turkeys-rising-role-in-africa.
  • Özkan, Mehmet. “What Drives Turkey’s Involvement in Africa?” Review of African Political Economy 37, no. 126 (2010): 533–40. doi:10.1080/0305624 20530952.
  • Özkan, Mehmet. “Turkey’s Opening to Africa.” The Journal of Modern Afri- can Studies 48,4 (December 2010): 525–46.
  • Pham, J. Peter. “India’s Expanding Relations with Africa and Their Implica- tions for U.S. Interests.” American Foreign Policy Interests 29, no. 5 (Novem- ber 2, 2007): 341–52. doi:10.1080/10803920701681378.
  • Raich, Manjola. “New Scramble for Africa?” Phd, uniwien, 2010. http://othes. univie.ac.at/14523/.
  • Raphael Kaplinsky, Dorothy McCormick, Mike Morris. “Impacts and Chal- lenges of a Growing Relationship between China and Sub-Saharan Africa.” In The Political Economy of Africa, edited by Vishnu Padayachee, 389–409. London ; New York: Routledge, 2010.
  • Republic of Turkey Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “Turkey-Africa Relations.” Accessed August 24, 2015. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkey-africa-relations. en.mfa.
  • Saraiva, José Flávio Sombra. “The New Africa and Brazil in the Lula Era: The Rebirth of Brazilian Atlantic Policy.” Revista Brasileira de Política In- ternacional 53, no. SPE (December 2010): 169–82. doi:10.1590/S0034- 73292010000300010.
  • Schoeman, Maxi. “Of BRICs and Mortar: The Growing Relations between Africa and the Global South.” The International Spectator 46, no. 1 (March 1, 2011): 33–51. doi:10.1080/03932729.2011.549753.
  • Sekhri, Sofiane. “The Role Approach as a Theoretical Framework for the Anal- ysis of Foreign Policy in Third World Countries.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations Vol. 3 (10) (October 2009): 423–32.
  • “Sobre O Instituto.” Accessed March 28, 2015. http://www.institutolula.org/ sobre.
  • Stolte, Christina. Brazil in Africa: Just Another BRICS Country Seeking Re- sources?. Briefing Paper. Chatham House, November 2012.
  • Street, 1615 L., NW, Suite 700 Washington, and DC 20036 202 419 4300 |
  • Main 202 419 4349 | Fax 202 419 4372 | Media Inquiries. “Chapter 4. Global
  • Balance of Power.” Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project. Accessed March 1, 2015. http://www.pewglobal.org/2013/07/18/chapter-4-global-bal- ance-of-power/.
  • Stuenkel, Oliver. “Brazil in Africa: Bridging the Atlantic?” KAS International Reports, January 2, 2013, 28–39.
  • Stuenkel, Oliver. “The BRICS’ African Safari.” The Diplomat, January 17, 20 http://thediplomat.com/2014/01/the-brics-african-safari/.
  • Taylor, Ian. “China’s Oil Diplomacy in Africa.” International Affairs 82, no. 5 (September 1, 2006): 937–59. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00579.x.
  • Uchoa, Pablo, and Maputo. “Brazil’s President Lula Makes Final Visit to Af- rica.” BBC News, September 11, 2010. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin- america-11717757.
  • Vigevani, Tullo, and Gabriel Cepaluni. “Lula’s Foreign Policy and the Quest for Autonomy through Diversification.” Third World Quarterly 28, no. 7 (Oc- tober 1, 2007): 1309–26. doi:10.1080/01436590701547095.
  • Wheeler, Tom. “Ankara to Africa: Turkey’s Outreach since 2005.” South Afri- can Journal of International Affairs 18, no. 1 (April 2011): 43–62. doi:10.108 0/10220461.2011.564426.
  • Woods, Ngaire. “Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance.” International Affairs 84, no. 6 (November 1, 2008): 1205–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00765.x.