İsrai̇l’i̇n Nükleer Poli̇ti̇kasının Konstrükti̇vi̇st Analizi

Sosyal inşacılığa göre, somut kaynaklar bağlı oldukları ve paylaşılan bilgi yapısı aracılığıyla insan eylemlerinde bir anlam kazanırlar ve kimlikler aktörlerin maddi ve maddi olmayan çıkarlarını şekillendirir. Bu çalışma İsrail’in nükleer silahlar için inşa ettiği anlamları incelemeyi ve İsrail’in nükleer politikasını sosyal inşacı bakış açısınmdan analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın yazarı, İsrail için nükleer silahlara sahip olmanın, Siyonist politika tasarımının bir devamı olduğunu tartışmaktadır. Bundan amaç, devletin “Yahudi” karakterini ve aynı zamanda da varlığını koruma ve güvence altına almaktır. Buna ek olarak, yazar, İsrail’in Arap saldırıları karşısında caydırıcı olduğunu düşündüğü nükleer politikasının başarısız olduğunu; bölgede geleneksel olmayan (non-conventional) silah yarışını da tetiklediğini öne sürmektedir.

A Constructivist Analysis of Israel’s Nuclear Policy

According to social constructivism, material resources acquire meaning for human action through the structure of shared knowledge in which they are embedded  and identities shape the actor’s material and non-material interests. This article would seek to examine Israel’s constructed meaning of nuclear weapons and to analyze Israel’s nuclear policy from a social constructivist perspective. It is argued that having nuclear weapons for Israel, is the prominence of Zionist design. The aim is to protect the existence of the state while preserving its “Jewishness”; simply to safeguard the identity. It is also argued that Israel’s nuclear policy as deterrent factor vis-à-vis Arab attacks, has not only failed but also fueled a non-conventional arms race in the region since Israel is perceived as a threat in the Arab shared knowledge. 

___

  • Ben Dor, Gabriel, “Regional Culture and NACD in Middle East”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol.19, No.1, (1998): 189-218
  • Cochran, Edwin S., “Israel’s Nuclear History”, Israel Affairs, Vol. 6, No.3-4, (2000): 129-156
  • Elpeleg, Zvi, Filistin Ulusal Hareketinin Kurucusu Hacı Emin El Hüseyni, trans- lated by Dilek Şendil, İstanbul: İletişim Yayinlari, 1999
  • Feldman, Shai and Abdullah Toukan, Bridging the Gap: A Future Security Archi- tecture for Middle East, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publications, 1997
  • Frey, Karsten, “The Psychology of Nuclear Choice”, Journal of Genocide Rese- arch, Vol. 9, No.3, (2007): 369-387
  • Heller, Mark A., Continuity and Change in Israeli Security Policy, London: Ox- ford University Press, 2000
  • Hopf, Ted, “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory”, International Security, Vol. 23, No.1, (1998): 171-200
  • Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Relations, Prince- ton: Princeton University Press, 1976
  • Johnston, Alastair I., “Thinking about Strategic Culture”, International Security, Vol. 19, No. 4, (1995): 32-64
  • Kaldor, Mary, New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era, Cambridge:Polity Press, 2006
  • Kimmerling, Baruch, Clash of Identities: Explorations in Israeli and Palestinian Societies, New York: Columbia University Press, 2008
  • Krause, Keith, “ Cross-cultural Dimensions of Multilateral non-Proliferation and Arms Control Dialogues: An Overview”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol.19, No.1, (1998): 1-22
  • Maoz, Zeev, Defending the Holy Land: A Critical Analysis of Israel’s Security & Foreign Policy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006
  • Oren, MichaeL, Six Days of War: June 1967and the Making of theModern Middle
  • East, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002
  • Sagan, Scott, “Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?”, International Security, Vol.21, No.3, (1996): 54-86
  • Smith, Anthony, Milli Kimlik, translated by Bahadir Sina Şener, İstanbul: İletişim Yayinlari, 2007
  • Van Wyk, Jo-Ansie, and Linda Kinghorn, “The International Politics of Nuclear Weapons: A Constructivist Analysis”, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol.35, No. 1, (2007): 1-28
  • Wendt, Alexander, “Constructing International Relations”, International Security, Vol.20, No.1, (1995): 71-81
  • Wendt, Alexander, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State”, The American Political Science Review, Vol.88, No.2, (1994): 384-396
  • Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Relations, Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1999