Nietzsche’nin Zerdüşt’ünün Çınlayamadığı Kulaklar: Nietzsche 21. Yüzyıl İnsanına Ahlak Üzerine Ne Söyleyebilir?

Bu makalede yapılması amaçlanan şey Nietzsche’nin kendi dönemindeki farklı ahlak anlayışlarına dair temel eleştirisini incelemektir. Bu eleştiri ile bir likte, karşılaşılan ahlaka dair doğrudan ya da metaforik olarak ifade edilen gö rüşlerin bütünlükçü bir şekilde anlaşılması amaçlanmıştır. Burada immoralizm ve amoralizm kavramları arasındaki fark akılda tutularak Nietzsche’nin görüşleri yorumlanmıştır. Bu bahsedilen amaca paralel olarak Nietzsche’de bir tür ah lak anlayışı (ahlakın olmadığı bir ahlak anlayışı olarak belki de) olarak görülebilecek bir düşünmenin mevcut olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır. En son olarak da Nietzsche’nin ahlak üzerine görüşlerinin 21. yüzyıl ve gelmekte olan 22. yüzyıl insanı için bir değeri olup olmadığı, bu insan için geriye onun bu eleştirilerinden öğrenilecek bir şey kalıp kalmadığı düşünülmüştür.

Ears That Nietzsche’s Zarathustra Cannot Ring: What Can Nietzsche Say about Morality to 21st Century Human?

In this article, it has been aimed to examine Nietzsche’s main cri tique towards different understandings of morals in his era. With this criticism, it is aimed to integrally understand the opinions -which are articulated directly or metaphorically- towards morals which have been encountered. In here, while keeping in mind the difference between the concepts of immoralism and amor alism, Nietzsche’s views are interpreted. Being parallel to that aim mentioned above, it has been investigated if there is a thinking in Nietzsche which can be seen as a kind of understanding of morals (maybe as the understanding of mor als without morals) or not. And finally, it has been thought that if Nietzsche’s views on morals have any value for the 21st century and upcoming 22nd century human or not, if there’s something left to learn for this human from his cri tiques or not.

___

  • Solomon, R. C. (2003). Living with Nietzsche: What the Great “Immoralist” Has to Teach Us. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2015). Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality. (Trans. R. J. Hollingdale). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2008). Gay Science: With a Prelude in German Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs. (Trans. J. Nauckhoff & A. Del Caro). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2007d). The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings. (Trans. R. Speirs). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2007c). The Anti-Christ. Ecce Homo. Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings. (Trans. J. Norman). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2007b). On the Geneology of Morality. (Trans. C. Diethe). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2007a). Ecce Homo: How to Become What You Are. (Trans. D. Large). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2006). Thus Spoke Zarahustra: A Book for All and None. (Trans. A. Del Caro). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2005). Human, All Too Human. (Trans. R. J. Hollingdale). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. (Trans. J. Norman). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nietzsche, F. (1968). Will to Power. (Trans. W. Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale). New York: Random House Inc.
  • Nietzsche, F. (1899). The Case of Wagner, Nietzsche Contra Wagner, The Twilight of the Idols, The Antichrist. (Trans. T. Common). London: T. Fisher Unwin.
  • Nabais, N. (2006). Nietzsche and the Metaphysics of the Tragic. (Çev. M. Earl). New York: Continuum.
  • May, S. (2002). Nietzsche’s Ethics and his War on ‘Morality’. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Leiter, B. (2015). Nietzsche on Morality. New York: Routledge.
  • Köse, D. (2008). Nietzsche Felsefesi: Modernizm, Ahlak ve İmmoralizm. YL Tezi. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi SBE.
  • Hoy, D. C. (1994). Nietzsche, Hume, and the Genealogical Method. Nietzsche, Genealogy, Morality: Essays on Nietzsche’s On the Genealogy of Morals. (Ed. R. Schacht). Berkeley: University of California Press, 251-268.
  • Guay, R. (2007). How To Be An Immoralist. Nietzsche and Ethics. (Ed. G. von Tevenar). Bern: Peter Lang, AG, 55-88.
  • Foot, P. (2003). Nietzsche’s Immoralism. Nietzsche: Critical Assesments 3: On Morality and the Order of Rank. (Eds. D. W. Conway & P. S. Groff). London: Routledge, 49-60.
  • Foot, P. (2002). Moral Dilemmas: And Other Topics in Moral Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Dudley, W. (2002). Hegel, Nietzsche, and Philosophy: Thinking Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Deleuze, G. 2002. Nietzsche and Philosophy. (Trans. H. Tomlinson). New York: Continuum.
  • Cevizci, A. (2014). Etik: Ahlak Felsefesi, İstanbul: Say Yayınları.
  • Cartwright, D. E. (1984). Kant, Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche on the Morality of Pity. Journal of the History of Ideas, 45 (1), 83-98.
  • Brobjer, T. H. (2003). Nietzsche’s Affirmative Morality: An Ethics of Virtue. Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 26, 64-78.
  • Berkowitz, P. (2003). Nietzsche: Bir Ahlak Karşıtının Etiği. (Çev. E. Demirel). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  • Baofu, P. (2011). Beyond Ethics to Post-Ethics: A Preface to a New Theory of Morality and Immorality. North Carolina: Information Age Pub.
  • Acampora, C. D. & Pearson, K. A. (2011). Nietzsche’s ‘Beyond Good and Evil’: A Reader’s Guide. London: Continuum.