John Locke did not apply the epistemological criteria which were determined in his Essay to the Reasonableness in which he argued reasonableness of Christian belief. Instead, he supported his arguments about authenticity of Christian revelation and being the true words of God, by miracles. His strategy of justifying the reliability of the miracles by basing it to the reliability of witness considered philosophically inconsistent and target of criticism from different aspects. As a consequence; it can be seen that, Locke opinions about the possibility of demonstration of the existence of God and knowledge about ethical propositions as certain as mathematical propositions, deviated to a kind of fideistic approach in arguing the reasonableness of Christian belief and revelation
___
Anstey, P. (2011). Locke's Christology as a Key to Unederstanding His Philo- sophy. Christianity, Antiquity, and Enlightenment (ed. V. Nuovo). Dordretch, Netherlands: Springer, 75-100.
Ashcraft, R. (1969). Faith and Knowledge in Locke's Philosophy. John Locke: Prob- lems and Perspectives (ed. J. W. Yolton). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 194-224.
Dumsday, T. (2008). Locke on Competing Miracles. Faith and Philosophy, 25 (4), 416-424.
Froster, G. (2005). John Locke's Politics of Moral Consensus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Locke, J. (1823). A Discourse of Miracles. The Works of John Locke. London, IX, 256-266.
Locke, J. (1952). Essays on the Law of Nature (ed. W. von Leyden). Oxford: Claren- don Press.
Locke, J. (1958). A Discourse of Miracles. The Reasonableness of Christianity with A Discourse of Miracles and Part of A Third Letter Concerning Toleration (ed. I. T. Ramsey). London: Adam & Charles Black, 79-87.
Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (ed. P. H. Nidditch). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locke, J. (1990). An Early Draft of Locke's Essay (eds. P. H. Nidditch & G. A. J. Rogers). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locke, J. (1999). The Reasonableness of Christianity: As Delivered in the Scriptures (ed. J. C. Higgins-Biddle). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mooney, T. B. & Imbrosciano, A. (2005). The Curious Case of Mr. Locke's Mi- racles. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 57, 147-168.
Rabieh, M. S. (1991). The Reasonableness of Locke, or the Questinableness of Christianity. The Journal of Politics, 53 (4), 933-957.
Öz: Dinî inancın aklî olabilmesi için Essay'de belirttiği çeşitli epis
temolojik kriterleri, Hıristiyan inancının aklîliğini savunduğu Rea
sonablenss adlı eserinde uygulamayan John Locke, Hıristiyan vahyi
nin otantik olduğu ve hakikaten Tanrı sözü olduğu iddiasını des
teklemek için mucize kanıtını destek olarak öne sürmüştür. Muci
zenin güvenirliğini ona şahit olanların güvenilirliğine dayandıran
Locke'un bu argümanı felsefî açıdan tutarlı olmamakla birlikte pek
çok noktadan da eleştiriye açıktır. Sonuç olarak; Tanrı'nın varlığı
ve ahlakî önermelere dair bilginin matematiksel kesinlik derece
sinde ispatlanabileceğini öne süren Locke'un, Hıristiyan vahyi ve
inancının aklî olduğunu ispatlama konusunda fideizm benzeri bir
anlayışa meylettiği görülmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: John Locke, Hristiyanlık, aklîlik, mucize, inanç, tasdik.