Turco-French Struggle for Mastery in Cilicia and the Ankara Agreement of 1921

French occupation of Cilicia following the First World War was mainly strategic and economic in character. The French committed all the errors of wicked military occupation. The Turkish Nationalists, on their part, fiercely resisted the foreign occupation of the region. By May 1920 the military weakness of the French had compelled them to surrender Maraş, Urfa and Pozantı. Defeat on battleground forced the French to conclude an armistice with the Turks. This act was considered as a serious blow to the prestige of the Allies and as the first big step towards the recognition of the Turkish Nationalists as a government controlling Anatolia. Resumption of the armed operations by the Turks produced considerable alarm at Paris. The French eventually concluded that the consts of controlling Cilicia outweighed dthe benefits of this venture and decided to approach Ankara for settlement. France was impressed by Turkish victory over the Greeks in the Sakarya battle in August-September 1921. Negotiations were therefore entered into with the Turks and an agreement was signed on 20 October 1921. This agreement was the greatest Turkish diplomatic victory so far. It had very significant bearings. Ankara Agreement's terms were criticised by Britain, French colonial party and Syrian nationalists.

Turco-French Struggle for Mastery in Cilicia and the Ankara Agreement of 1921

French occupation of Cilicia following the First World War was mainly strategic and economic in character. The French committed all the errors of wicked military occupation. The Turkish Nationalists, on their part, fiercely resisted the foreign occupation of the region. By May 1920 the military weakness of the French had compelled them to surrender Maraş, Urfa and Pozantı. Defeat on battleground forced the French to conclude an armistice with the Turks. This act was considered as a serious blow to the prestige of the Allies and as the first big step towards the recognition of the Turkish Nationalists as a government controlling Anatolia. Resumption of the armed operations by the Turks produced considerable alarm at Paris. The French eventually concluded that the consts of controlling Cilicia outweighed dthe benefits of this venture and decided to approach Ankara for settlement. France was impressed by Turkish victory over the Greeks in the Sakarya battle in August-September 1921. Negotiations were therefore entered into with the Turks and an agreement was signed on 20 October 1921. This agreement was the greatest Turkish diplomatic victory so far. It had very significant bearings. Ankara Agreement's terms were criticised by Britain, French colonial party and Syrian nationalists.
BELLETEN-Cover
  • ISSN: 0041-4255
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1937
  • Yayıncı: Türk Tarih Kurumu
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

1997-1999 Yılları Yüzey Araştırmalarında İncelenen Samsun-Amasya İlleri İ.Ö. 2. Binyılı Yerleşmeleri

Şevket DÖNMEZ

Yirminci Yüzyılda Vakıf Çalışmaları: Durum Tespiti

Miriam HOEXTER

Turco-French Struggle for Mastery in Cilicia and the Ankara Agreement of 1921

Yücel GÜÇLÜ

Tarih-i Hind-i Garbî veya Hadîs-i Nev, Tarihi Araştırmalar Vakfı, İstanbul Araştırma Merkezi, İstanbul 1999, 483 s. [Kitap Tanıtımı]

Zafer GÖLEN

Ottomans, Hungarians, and Habsburgs in Central Europe, The Military Confines in the Era of Ottoman Conquest, ed.Geza David-Pal Fodor, Brill Pub., Leiden-Boston-Köln 2000, XI+297, bibliyografya, indeks [Kitap Tanıtımı]

Feridun M. EMECEN

EVANGELİA BALTA, Peuple et Production. Pour une interpretation des sources ottomanes, İstanbul 1999, 281 sayfa. Analecta Isisiana XLI. [A.VI/656]. Problemes et Approches de l'Histoire Ottomane. Un itineraire scientifique de Kayseri a Eğriboz, İstanbul 1997, 325 sayfa. Analecta Isisiana XXVIII. [A.VI

Mahmut H. ŞAKİROĞLU

Haçlı Seferleri Kaynaklarının Büyük Külliyatı Recueil des Historiens des Croisades II Bizanslı Tarihçiler

Işın DEMİRKENT

İslam Müelliflerine Göre Ortaçağ'da Oş Şehri

Gülnisa AYNAKULOVA

EVANGELİA BALTA, Peuple et Production. Pour une interpretation des sources ottomanes, İstanbul 1999, 281 sayfa. Analecta Isisiana XLI. [A.VI/656]. Problemes et Approches de l'Histoire Ottomane. Un itineraire scientifique de Kayseri a Eğriboz, İstanbul 1997, 325 sayfa. Analecta Isisiana XXVIII.

Mahmut H. ŞAKİROĞLU

Osmanlı Hukukunda Mahkeme Kararlarının Kontrolü (Klasik Devir)

Ekrem Buğra EKİNCİ