Türkiye Finansal Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisinin İnşaası

Bu çalışma var olan en güncel veriler kullanılarak Türkiye için Finansal Sosyal Hesaplar Matrisi (FSHM) oluşturmayı hedeflemektedir. FSHM inşasında Türkiye ekonomisinin yapı- sal özellikleri kaynak akım tabloları eşliğinde gösterilirken, farklı hesapların birleştirilmesi işlemleri detaylı olarak sunulmaktadır. Ülkemizde ne yazık ki veri yetersizliği sebebiyle Fi- nansal Genel Denge Modelleri yaygın olarak kullanılamamıştır. Oluşturulan bu FSHM’nin araştırmacılar tarafından bu alandaki yapılacak çalışmalara önemli bir zemin hazırlayaca- ğı düşünülmektedir. Ayrıca FSHM inşasında izlenilen yol ve kullanılan verilerin birbiriyle tutarlı olarak işlenebilmesi açısından bu çalışmanın katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Construction of Financial Accounting Matrix for Turkey

This study aims to construct a Financial Social Accounting Matrix (FSAM) for Turkey using the most recent available data. It thereby provides a useful overview of the main financial flows in Turkish economy and meanwhile consolidation and processing of raw data is presented in detail. Unfortunately, Financial Computable General Equilibrium Models have not been widely used in our country due to data insufficiency. This FSAM for Turkey will prepare an important ground for studies in this field to be carried out by the researchers. In addition, we think that this study is important in terms of consistently processing the raw data used in the construction process of FSAM.

PDF

___

1. Adelman, I., Yeldan, A. E., Sarris, A.ve Roland-Holst, D. W. (1989). Optimal adjustment to trade shocks under alternative development strategies. Jour- nal of Policy Modeling, 11:451-505.
2. Aslan, M. (2007). The Construction of a Financial Social Accounting Matrix for the Turkish Economy with 1996 Data. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilim- ler Dergisi, 7(1): 287-306.
3. Celasun, M. (1986). A general equilibrium model of the Turkish economy, SIMLOG-1. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 13: 29-94.
4. Dervis, K., de Melo, J. ve Robinson, S. (1982). General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Emini,A.C. (2002). Building a Social Accounting Matrix with Financial Assets : A Cameroon Application Designed for the IMMPA. ABD: Dünya Bankası Yayınları.
6. European Commission ve Eurostat, (2020). Manual on Sources and Methods for the compilation of ESA95 Financial Accounts 2020, http://epp.eurostat. ec.europa.eu
7. Harrison, G. W., Rutherford, T. F. ve Tarr, D. G. (1993). Trade reform in the partially liberalized economy of Turkey. The World Bank Economic Review, 7: 192-217.
8. Helbig, J. (2013). From an Elaborated Financial Social Accounting Matrix (FSAM) to a Full Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model for Germany. Mexico, Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey
9. Hernández, G. (2008). Building a Financial Social Accounting Matrix for Co- lombia. Applied Economic Studies, 26: 7–26.
10. Hubic, A. (2012). A Financial Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) for Luxembo- urg. Central Bank of Luxembourg Working Paper, no:72.
11. Jellema, T., Keuning, S., McAdam, P., ve Mink, R. (2006). Developing an Ac- counting Matrix for the Euro Area: Issues and Applications. In: Alain Janvry and Ravi Kanbur (eds.) Poverty, Inequality and Development, Boston, MA, Springer, 261–286
12. Leung, D. ve Secrieru, O. (2012). Real-financial Linkages in the Canadian Economy: An Input–Output Approach. Economic Systems Research, 24: 195–223.
13. Lequiller, F. ve Blades, D. (2006). Understanding National Accounts. OECD Publishing.
14. Li, J. (2008). The Financial Social Accounting Matrix for China, 2002, and Its Application to a Multiplier Analysis. Forum of International Development Studies, 36: 215–239.
15. Miller, R. E., ve Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: Foundations and extensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16. Özhan, H. G. (1988). A planning model for Turkey within a social accounting framework, Yapı Kredi Economic Review, 11: 25-52.
17. Özhan, H. G. (1989). A planning model for Turkey within a social accounting framework,. Ankara: Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı 18. Pişkin, M. ve Hannum, C.M. (2017). Constructing a multi-regional social accounting Matrix for Turkey. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(4):176–196.
19. Pyatt G. ve Round, J. I. (1985). Social Accounting Matrices: A Basis for Plan- ning. The World Bank, Washington D C.
20. Roberto A. De Santis ve H. Gazi Özhan (1997). Social Accounting Matrix for Turkey 1990. Economic Systems Research, 9(3): 281-285.
21. Şenesen, G. G. (1991). A social accounting matrix for Turkey. Tuplum ve Ekonomi, 13:17-42.
22. Seventer, D., Hartley, F., Gabriel, S., Davies, R. (2016). A 2012 Social Acco- unting Matrix (SAM) for South Africa. WIDER Working Paper, No. 2016:26, The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNU-WIDER), Helsinki.
23. Stone, J. R. N. (1961). Social accounts at the regional level: A survey. In: W. Isard and J. Cumberland eds., 1960. Regional economic planning: Techniqu- es of analysis for less developed areas. Paris: OECD
24. Tsujimura, K. ve M. Mizoshita (2003). Asset-Liability-Matrix Analysis Derived from the Flow-ofFunds Accounts: The Bank of Japan’s Quantitative Monetary Policy Examined. Economic Systems Research, 15: 51–67.
25. Yeldan, A. E. (1989). Structural adjustment and trade in Turkey: investigating the alternatives “beyond export-led growth”. Journal of Policy Modeling, 11:273-296.