Lise ve Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Kimyaya Yönelik Motivasyonlarının İncelenmesi: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışma
Bu çalışmada, lise ve üniversite öğrencilerinin kimyaya yönelik motivasyonları incelenmiştir ve buamaçla kullanılan Kimya Motivasyon Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları yapılmıştır. Aynızamanda, cinsiyetin motivasyon üzerindeki etkisi de araştırılmıştır. Öğrencilerin kimyaya yönelikmotivasyonlarını belirlemek amacıyla Kimya Motivasyon Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubunu liseve üniversite öğrencileri oluşturmuştur. Kimya Motivasyon Ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlikçalışmaları yapıldıktan sonra lise ve üniversite öğrencilerine uygulanıp öğrencilerin motivasyonlarıarasındaki farklılıklar incelenmiştir. Verilerin analizi sonucunda, öğrencilerin kimyaya yönelikmotivasyonlarına sınıf düzeyinin bir etkisinin olduğu, fakat cinsiyetin bir etkisinin olmadığıbelirlenmiştir.
Investigating High School and University Students’ Motivation Towards Chemistry: A Cross Age Study
This study aims at investigating high school and university students’ motivation towards chemistryand at conducting the validity and reliability study of the Chemistry Motivation Scale to be used for that purpose. In addition to that, the effects of gender on motivation was also focused on in thisresearch. The Chemistry Motivation Scale was employed so as to determine the students’ motivationstowards chemistry. The study group was composed of high school and university students. Havingdone the validity and reliability analyses of the Chemistry Motivation Scale, it was applied to highschool and university students; and the differences between students’ motivations were examined.Following the analyses of the data, it was found that grade level was influential in students’motivations in chemistry, but that gender was not.
___
- Akbaş, A. ve Kan, A. (2007). Affective factors that influence chemistry achievement (motivation
and anxiety) and the power of these factors to predict chemistry achievement. Journal of
Turkish Science Education, 4(1), 10-‐‑20.
Aktan, S. ve Tezci, E. (2013). Matematik motivasyon ölçeği (mmö) geçerlik ve güvenirlik
çalışması. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(4), 57-‐‑77.
Anderman, E. M. ve Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived
academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-‐‑level schools.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 269-‐‑298.
Aşkar, P. ve Mazman, S.G. (2013). Çevrimiçi bilgi arama stratejileri envanterinin Türkçeye
uyarlama çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(168), 167-‐‑182.
Azizoğlu, N., ve Çetin, G. (2009). 6 ve 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin öğrenme stilleri, fen dersine
yönelik tutumları ve motivasyonları arasındaki ilişki. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 171-‐‑
182.
Britner, S. L. ve Pajares, F. (2001). Self-‐‑efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle
school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 271-‐‑285.
Bryan, R. R., Glynn, S. M. ve Kittleson, J. M. (2011). Motivation, achievement, and advanced
placement intent of high school students learning science. Science Education, 95(6), 1049-‐‑
1065.
Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Büyüköztürk, Ş. ve Demirel F. (2008). İlköğretim
ikinci kademe ve lise öğrencilerinin ders ve sınıf düzeylerine göre öğrenme stratejileri ve
güdülenme düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 1-‐‑27.
Çavaş, P. (2011). Factor affecting the motivation of Turkish primary students for science
learning. Science Education International, 22(1), 31-‐‑42.
Çelik, H. E. ve Yılmaz, V. (2013). Lisrel 9.1 ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (Yenilenmiş 2. Baskı).
Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
Çetin Dindar, A. ve Geban, Ö. (2009). The Turkish adaptation of the science motivation questionnaire.
European Science Education Research Association Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dai, D. Y. (2001). A comparison of gender differences in academic self-‐‑concept and motivation
between high-‐‑ability and average Chinese adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted
Education, 13(1), 22-‐‑32.
Debacker, T. K. ve Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to
gender, class type, and ability. The Journal of Educational Research, 93 (4), 245-‐‑54.
Duit, R. ve Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science — From behaviourism towards social
constructivism and beyond. In B. Fraser and K. Tobin (Eds) International Handbook of
Science Education (pp. 3–26). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Eccles, J. S., Simpkins, S. D. ve Davis-‐‑Kean, P. E. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitu-‐‑
dinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42,
70–83.
Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D. ve Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in
children’s self-‐‑ and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64,830-‐‑
847.
Garver, M. S. ve Mentzer, J.T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation
modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33-‐‑57.
Gay, L. R. ve Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th
Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-‐‑Hall.
Gins I. S. ve Watters J.J. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of
collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. Journal of Science
Teacher Education, 11(4), 301-‐‑321.
Githua, B.N. ve Mwangi J.G. (2003). Students self-‐‑concept and motivation to learn mathematics:
Relationship and gender differences among Kenya'ʹs secondary school students in Nairobi
and Rift Valley Provinces. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 487-‐‑499.
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N. ve Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation
Questionnaire II: Validation with science majors and nonscience majors. Journal of Research
in Science Teaching, 48, 1159-‐‑1176.
Glynn, S. M. ve Koballa, T. R., Jr. (2006). Motivation to learn college science. In J. J. Mintzes ve
W. H. Leonard (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25-‐‑32). Arlington, VA:
National Science Teachers Association Press.
Güngören, S. (2009). The effect of grade level on elementary school students'ʹ motivational beliefs in
science. Master'ʹs Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Güvercin, O. (2008). Investigating elementary student’s motivation towards science learning: A cross
age study. Master'ʹs Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Güvercin, O., Tekkaya, C. ve Sungur, S. (2010). A cross age study of elementary students’
motivation towards science learning. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39, 233-‐‑243.
Hacıeminoğlu, E., Yılmaz-‐‑Tüzün, Ö. ve Ertepınar, H. (2009). İlkokul öğrencilerinin öğrenme
yaklaşımlarının, güdüsel hedeflerinin ve Fen başarılarının incelenmesi. Hacettepe
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37, 72-‐‑83.
Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique.
Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76-‐‑83.
Jacobsen, D.A., Eggen, P. ve Kauchak, D. (2002). Methods for Teaching, Promoting Student Learning
(Sixth Ed.). New Jersey: Meririll Prentice Hall.
Kahraman, N. ve Sungur, S. (2011) The contribution of motivation beliefs to students'ʹ
metacognitive strategy. Education and Science, 36(160), 3-‐‑10.
Karaarslan, G. ve Sungur, S. (2011). Elementary students’ self-‐‑efficacy beliefs in science: Role of
grade level, gender, and socio-‐‑economic status. Science Education International, 22(1), 72-‐‑79.
Karagöz Bolat, N. (2007). İlköğretim 6. ve 7. sınıf fen ve teknoloji bilgisi dersi öğrencilerinin öğrenme
stillerine göre motivasyon başarı düzeyleri. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi
Üniversitesi, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Kelecioğlu, H. (1992). Güdülenme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7, 175–181.
Keller, J.M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instructional
design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383-‐‑434). Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum.
Kempa, R. ve Diaz, M. M. (1990). Motivational traits and preferences for different instructional
modes in science. Part 1, students'ʹ motivational traits. International Journal of Science
Education, 12, 195-‐‑203.
Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş. ve Çokluk Bökeoğlu, Ö. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik.
Ankara:Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Kuyper, H., van der Werf, M.P.C. ve Lubbers, M.J. (2000). Motivation, meta-‐‑cognition and self-‐‑
regulation as predictors of long term educational attainment. Educational Research and
Evaluation, 6(3), 181–201.
Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L. ve Logvin, M. (2007). Self-‐‑efficacy, reasoning ability, and achieve-‐‑
ment in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 706–724.
Lee, O. ve Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in sixth-‐‑grade science classrooms.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 585–610.
Lepper, M.R., Corpus J.H. ve Iyengar S.S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic orientations in the
classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology,
97(2), 184-‐‑196.
Lightbody, P., Siann, G., Stocks, R. ve Walsh, D. (1996). Motivation and attribution at secondary
school: The role of gender. Educational Studies, 22, 13-‐‑25.
Meece, J. L. ve Jones, M. G. (1996). Gender differences in motivation and strategy use in science:
Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 393-‐‑406.
Napier, J.D. ve Riley, J.P. (1985). Relationship between affective determinants and achievement
in science for seventeen-‐‑year-‐‑olds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(4), 365–383.
Otis, N., Grouzet, F.E.M. ve Pelletier L.G. (2005). Latents motivational change in an academic
setting: A 3-‐‑year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 170-‐‑183.
Pintrich, P.R., Marx, R.W. ve Boyle, R.A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of
motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change.
Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia,T. ve McKeachie W.J. (1991). A manual for the use of the
motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Michigan: School of Educational
Building, The University of Michigan pp. 79-‐‑80.
Reeve, J., Hamm, D. ve Nix, G. (2003). Testing models of the experience of self-‐‑determination in
intrinsic motivation and the conundrum of choice. Journal of Educational Psychology,
95,375–392.
Sabuncuoğlu, Z. ve Tüz, M. (1998). Örgütsel psikoloji. Bursa: Alfa Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
Schermelleh-‐‑Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural
equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-‐‑of-‐‑fit measures. Methods
of Psychological Research-‐‑Online, 8(2), 23-‐‑74.
Schunk, D.H. (1990). Introduction to the special section on motivation and efficacy. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 82(1), 3–6.
Sevinç, B., Özmen, H. ve Yiğit, N. (2011). Investigation of primary students’ motivation levels
towards science learning. Science Education International, 22(3), 218-‐‑232.
Skaalvik S. ve Skaalvik E.M. (2004). Gender differences in math and verbal self-‐‑concept,
performance expectations, and motivation. Sex Roles, 50 (3/4), 241-‐‑252.
Strike, K.A. ve Posner, P.J. (1983). On rationality and learning: A reply to West and Pines.
Science Education, 67,41–43.
Strike, K.A. ve Posner, P.J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R.A. Duschl and
R.J. Hamilton (Eds), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and
Practice(pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk
Psikoloji Yazıları,3(6). 49–74.
Şenler, B. ve Sungur, S. (2009). Parental influences on students'ʹ self-‐‑concept, task value beliefs,
and achievement in science. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12, 106-‐‑117.
Tag, Y. (2008). The interplay of students'ʹ perceptions of classroom goal structures, personal goal
orientations and learning related variables. Master'ʹs Thesis, Middle East Technical
University, Ankara, Turkey.
Trumper, R. (1995). Students'ʹ motivational traits in science: A cross-‐‑age study. British
Educational Journal, 21 (4), 505-‐‑516.
URL-‐‑1, http://www.coe.uga.edu/outreach/programs/science-‐‑motivation, Erişim Tarihi:
02.12.2014.
URL-‐‑2, http://www.coe.uga.edu/assets/docs/outreach/smqii/SMQII-‐‑Translations.pdf, Erişim
Tarihi: 02.12.2014.
Uzun, N. ve Keleş, Ö. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin fen öğrenmeye yönelik motivasyon
düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi,
9(20), 313-‐‑327.
West, L.H.T. ve Pines, A.L. (1983). How ‘rational’ is rationality? Science Education, 67,37–39.
Wigfield, A. ve Eccles, J. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical
analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-‐‑310.
Wigfield, A. ve Eccles, J. S. (1994). Children’s competence beliefs, achievement values, and
general self esteem change across elementary and middle school. Journal of Early
Adolescence, 14(2), 107–138.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Mc Iver, D., Reuman, D.A. ve Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions during
early adolescence: Changes in children'ʹs domain-‐‑specific self-‐‑perceptions and general self-‐‑
esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27, 552-‐‑565.
Wolters, C. A. ve Rosenthal, H. (2000). The relation between students’ motivational beliefs and
their use of motivational regulation strategies. International Journal of Educational
Research, 33(7), 801-‐‑820.
Wolters, C.A. (1999). The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and
their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual
Differences, 11(3), 281–300.
Yavuz Göçer, F., Sungur, S. ve Tekkaya, C. (2011). Investigating Elementary School Students'ʹ
Motivational Traits in Science Classrooms. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(161), 76-‐‑84.
Yeung, A.S. ve Mclnerney, D. M. (2005). Students'ʹ school motivation and aspiration over high
school years. Educational Psychology, 25(5), 537-‐‑554.
Yılmaz, H. ve Huyugüzel Çavaş, P. (2007). Fen öğrenimine yönelik motivasyon ölçeğinin
geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. İlköğretim Online, 6(3), 430-‐‑440.
Yurdugül, H. (2006). Paralel, eşdeğer ve konjenerik ölçmelerde güvenirlik katsayılarının
karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 39(1) 15.37.
Yurdugül, H. ve Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenme hazır bulunuşluluk ölçeği:
Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 391-‐‑406.
Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I. ve Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s, β and McDonalds
ω: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability.
Psychometrika, 70(1), 1-‐‑11.
Zusho A., Pintrich P. R. ve Coppalo, B. (2003). Skill and will: The role of motivation and
cognition in the learning of college chemistry. International Journal of Science Education,
25(9), 1081-‐‑1094.