Ideal Scıence Teacher From Perspective Of Gifted Students: Phenomenologıcial Study

Bu araştırmada 2000-2020 yılları arasında yayınlanmış Türkiye adresli etkili okul üzerine yapılan araştırma makalelerinin tanımlayıcı özelliklerini, yöntemsel boyutlarını ve genel eğilimlerini ortaya çıkarmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla 2000 ile 2020 yılları arasında yayımlanmış Dergi Park ve Google Akademik veri tabanlarında ‘‘etkili okul’’ ve ‘‘okul etkililiği’’ anahtar kelimesi ile taranan 23 makale incelenmiştir. İncelenen bu araştırmalar içerik analizi yöntemiyle sistematik bir biçimde değerlendirilmiştir. Makaleleri incelemek için Sözbilir, Kutu ve Yaşar (2012) tarafından geliştirilen makale sınıflama formu etkili okul araştırmaları için uyarlanarak kullanılmıştır. İçerik analizi ile incelenen çalışmalardan elde edilen veriler SPSS Statistics 23 programıyla yüzde ve frekans değerleri kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir. İncelenen araştırmalarda (I) etkili okul kavramının en çok okul yöneticisinin liderlik stilleri ile ilişkilendirildiği, (II) araştırmalarda nicel araştırma yönteminin sıklıkla kullanıldığı, (III) veri toplama aracı olarak anket tercih edildiği, (IV) tesadüfi örnekleme yönteminin yaygın olarak kullanıldığı ve (V) örneklem olarak en çok öğretmenlerin seçildiği görülmüştür.

Ideal Scıence Teacher From Perspective Of Gifted Students: Phenomenologıcial Study

In this study, it was aimed to reveal the descriptive characteristics, methodical dimensions and general trends of the research articles on Effective School in Turkey published between 2000-2020. These studies have been systematically evaluated through content analysis. For this purpose, 23 articles scanned with the keyword ‘effective school’ and ‘school effectiveness’ were examined in the Journal Park and Google academic databases published between 2000 and 2020. The article classification form developed by Sözbilir, Kutu and Yaşar (2012) was adapted and used for effective school research to examine the articles. The data obtained from the studies examined by content analysis were analyzed using percentage and frequency values. In these studies, it was observed that (I) the concept of an effective school is most often associated with the leadership styles of school administrators, (II) quantitative research method was often used, (III) survey was preferred as data collection tool, (IV)random sampling method was widely used and (V)teachers were chosen most as sample.

___

  • Abel, T., & Karnes, F. A. (1994). Teacher preferences among the lower socioeconomic rural and suburban advantaged gifted students. Roeper Review, 17(1), 52-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199409553619.
  • Chan, D. W. (2001). Characteristics and competencies of teachers of gifted learners: The Hong Kong teacher perspective. Roeper Review, 23(4), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554098.
  • Cheung, H. Y., & Phillipson, S. N. (2008). Teachers of gifted students in hong kong: competencies and characteristics. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(2).Retrieved from https://web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=0&sid=3178b3dd-57e2-43f1-a056- b68386c7fc10%40sdc-v-sessmgr03.
  • Copenhaver, R. W., & Mc Intyre, D. J. (1992). Teachers’ perception of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 151-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553411
  • Creswell, J.W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri: Beş yaklaşıma göre nitel araştırma ve araştırma deseni [Oualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches] (Translation from 3rd edition).( Translation Editors: M. Bütün ve S.B.Demir). Siyasal Publishing.
  • Cross, T. L., & Coleman, L. J. (1992). Gifted high school students' advice to science teachers. Gifted Child Today (GCT), 15(5), 25-26. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ454496.
  • Çelikdelen, Hatice (2010). Bilim sanat merkezlerinde bilim birimlerinden destek alan üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin kendi okullarında fen ve teknoloji dersinde karsılaştıkları güçlüklerin değerlendirilmesi [The evaluation of the difficulties of talented students who face during the science and technology lessons in their own schools, are enrolled in science and art centers]. Master Thesis, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.
  • Darga, H. (2010). Brigance K&1 Screen II ile ilköğretim 1. sınıfta saptanan üstün yetenekli çocuklara ve sınıf arkadaşlarına uygulanan zenginleştirme programının çoklu zekâ alanlarındaki performans düzeylerini arttırmaya etkisi [The effect of enrichment programme applied to gifted/highly superior intelligent children and their classmates determined from primary education 1st class level via Brigance K&I Screen II, on improving their performance levels in multiple intelligence field], Doctorate Dissertation, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Dağlıoğlu, H. E. (2010). Üstün yetenekli çocukların eğitiminde öğretmen yeterlikleri ve özellikleri [Proficiency and characteristics of teachers ın the education of gifted children]. Journal of Ministery of Education, 40(186), 72-84. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/442757.
  • Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented. Pearson Education Press. Delisle, J. (2006). Parenting gifted kids: tips for raising happy and successful children. Prufrock Press.
  • Duneland Schools (1986). Gifted education handbook. Chesterton. Indiana. Retrieved from https://www.npsk12.com/cms/lib011/VA02208074/Centricity/Domain/717/Handbook-of-GiftedServicesv2.pdf
  • Eğitim İzleme Raporu 2016-2017 [Education Monitoring Report]. (2017). https://dspace.ceid.org.tr/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1/418/ekutuphane3.5.2.3.11.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowe d=y
  • Friedman, Y. & Krongold, N. (1993). Interaction between teachers and students: the student’s perspective. Jerusalem: Szold Institute. (In Hebrew)
  • Gökdere, M., & Çepnı, S. (2003). Üstün yetenekli ögrencilerin fen ögretmenlerinin egitimine yönelik bir model önerisi [A model proposal for gifted students' science teacher education]. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3). Retrieved from http://tojet.net/articles/v2i3/2318.pdf
  • Gökdere, M., & Çepni, S. (2004). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin fen öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi ihtiyaçlarının değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir çalışma bilim sanat merkezi örneklemi [ A study on the assessment of the ın-service needs of the science teachers of gifted students: a case for science art center]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 24(2). Retrieved from http://www.gefad.gazi.edu.tr/en/download/article-file/77314Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1990). Off campus training of teachers of the gifted: A program model. Gifted İnternational, 6(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/07387849.1990.11674849.
  • Hansen, J. B., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1994). Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38(3), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001698629403800304.
  • Hativa, N. (2003). Teaching processes in class. Tel Aviv: Academic Publishers for the Promotion of Teaching Staff. (In Hebrew)
  • Hızlı, E. (2014). Examining of gifted and talented education: Israeli education. Journal of Gifted Education Research, 2(2), 52-62. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/download/35985024/ISRAILDE_USTUN_ZEKALILAR_EGITIMI.pdf
  • Khalil, M., & Accariya, Z. (2016). Identifying “good” teachers for gifted students. Creative Education, 7(3), 407- 418. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.73040
  • Kanevsky, L., & Keighley, T. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554235
  • Landvogt, J. (2001). Affecting eternity: Teaching for talent development. Roeper Review, 23(4), 190-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554097
  • Lassig, C. J. (2003). Gifted and talented education reforms: Effects on teachers' attitudes. In 1st Annual International Conference on Cognition, Language, and Special Education Research: Reimagining Practice: Researching Change (pp. 141-152). Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/14299/1/14299.pdf
  • Leikin, R. (2011). Teaching the mathematically gifted: featuring a teacher. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11, 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.548902
  • Levent, F. (2013). Üstün yetenekli çocukları anlamak: Üstün yetenekli çocuklar sarmalında aile, eğitim sistemi ve toplum [Understanding gifted children: family, education system and society in a spiral of gifted children]. Nobel Publishing.
  • Manning, S. (2006). Recognizing gifted students: A practical guide for teachers. Kappa delta Pi record, 42(2), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2006.10516435
  • MEB (2017). Öğretmenlik mesleği genel yeterlilikleri [Generic Competences of Teaching Profession]. https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/www/ogretmenlik-meslegi-genel-yeterlikleri/icerik/486
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma: Desen ve uygulama için bir rehber [Oualitative research a guide to design and implementation](Translation from 3rd edition, Translation Edıtor: S. Turan). Nobel Publishing.
  • Milgram, R. M. (1979). Perception of teacher behavior in gifted and nongifted children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 125. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.125
  • Milgram, R. M. (2000). Identifying and enhancing talent in ısrael: A high national priority. Roeper Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554012
  • Milgram, R., & Hong, E. (2009). Talent loss in mathematics: causes and solutions. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, and B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students (pp. 149-163). Sense Publishers https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909352_011
  • Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 272-281. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001698620304700404.
  • Parke, Beverly, N. (1992). “Challenging gifted students in the regular classroom.” (ERIC Digest #E513). ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children Reston, Va. ED352774. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED352774
  • Robinson, A., Shore, B.M & Enersen, D.L. (2014). Üstün zekalılar eğitiminde en iyi uygulamalar: kanıt temelli bir kılavuz [Best practices in gifted education/ An evidence-based guide]. (Translation Editors: Ü. Ogurlu, F.Kaya). Nobel Publishing.
  • Tischler, K., & Vialle, W. J. (2009). Gifted students' perceptions of the characteristics of effective teachers.115-124. University of Wollongong Research Online, Faculty of Education – Papers https://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers?utm_source=ro.uow.edu.au%2Fedupapers%2F732&utm_medium =PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages Westberg, K. L., & Daoust, M. E. (2003). The results of the replication of the classroom practices survey replication in two states. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, 3(8). Retrieved from https://nrcgt.uconn.edu/newsletters/fall032/#
  • Ziv, Y., & Sorongon, A. (2011). Social information processing in preschool children: relations to sociodemographic risk and problem behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 412-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.009
  • Vialle, W., & Quigley, S. (2002). Does the teacher of the gifted need to be gifted? Gifted and Talented International, 17 (2), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2002.11672992.
  • Woods, J. W. (2004). The characteristics of successful and effective teachers of the gifted. Doctorate Dissertation,The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA. Retrieved from https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4578/
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. (5th edition). Seçkin Publishing.
Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi